Ping Liu1, Wanyi Zhen1, and Guihua Jiang1
1Department of Medical Imaging,, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors (Pre-Treatment), Brain, Glioma, Habitat imaging
Motivation: Accurate preoperative identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation is crucial for improving patients’ management in clinical practice. Intratumor heterogeneity in gliomas limits the accurate determination of IDH mutation to some extent.
Goal(s): T1-CE-derived BBB permeability and DWI-derived cell density habitat imaging may enable more precise prediction of IDH mutation by parcellating similar voxels using a clustering method.
Approach: We developed and validated imaging habitats based on T1-CE and DWI to predict IDH mutation by localized mapping of tumor heterogeneity.
Results: The damaged vascular and hypocellular imaging habitat performed best and robust to predict the IDH mutation, and was considered as the sensitive habitat.
Impact: Fully
recognizing and exploiting this heterogeneity can contribute to improving the
prediction accuracy of IDH mutation status, providing more precise treatment
and management strategies, and ultimately improving survival and quality of
life.
Introduction
Gliomas
are the most common malignant primary brain tumors [1].
Molecular subtypes, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), play vital roles in
the biological behaviors, treatment response, and clinical outcomes of gliomas [2].
Thus, accurate preoperative prediction of IDH mutation status is extremely
valuable for the precise treatment of gliomas. Molecular-level
IDH-mutant can reduce blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and tumor cell
density via multiple mechanisms [3–5].
The IDH status within gliomas is heterogeneous, resulting in non-homogeneous
vascular permeability, cell density, and volume ratios in subregions within the
tumor, namely, intratumor heterogeneity [6–7],
which influences the accurate determination of IDH mutation status in gliomas. As such, a
noninvasive, comprehensive, and generalizable heterogeneity assessment method
remains urgently warranted in clinical practice to improve the
accuracy of IDH mutation prediction.
Habitat
imaging have been developed to ameliorate the confirmation of IDH mutation by
characterizing and quantifying the intratumoral heterogeneity of gliomas, for
introducing the ecological habitats in tumors to reflect subregions within
tumors with similar biological characteristics, based on the theory that the
genomic and phenotypic of tumor heterogeneity can be revealed by medical images
[8].T1-weighted
contrast-enhanced imaging (T1-CE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be
applied to demonstrate BBB permeability and cell density, respectively[9].Materials and Methods
The study was approved by the Medical
Ethics Committee of local hospitals (no. 2023-KY-KZ-104-02).
A total of 165 pathologically confirmed patients with
glioma who underwent preoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (T1CE)
and diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) from three
hospitals (109 and 56 in the training and external validation cohorts,
respectively) were retrospectively included. The patient
enrollment process is illustrated in Fig.1. Four spatial habitats (subregions)
based on T1CE and DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient images were
defined employing k-means voxel-wise clustering. The sensitive habitat of IDH
mutation was identified and radiomic features were extracted from the whole
tumor and four habitats. Logistic regression classifiers were utilized to
construct predictive models for IDH mutation. The data
processing pipeline is illustrated in Fig.2.Results:
Habitat
1 (red) represents the damaged vascular and cellular habitat with high T1-CE
and low ADC values; habitat 2 (blue) represents the normal vascular and
hypocellular habitat with low T1-CE and high ADC values; habitat 3 (green)
represents the normal vascular and cellular habitat with low T1-CE and low ADC
values; habitat 4 (purple) represents the damaged vascular and hypocellular habitat
with
high T1-CE and high ADC values.
Fig. 3 shows the median volume proportion and ADC
in the four habitats according to IDH mutation status. The damaged vascular and
hypocellular habitat was determined as the sensitive habitat. Two
representative cases illustrating MRI vascular
permeability and cell density habitats in IDH-wildtype and mutant gliomas are shown
in Fig. 4. Fifteen significant radiomic features were selected for the models’
construction. The sensitive habitat model (area under curve [AUC], 0813; 95%
confidence interval [CI]: 0.676–0.958) showed significantly better performance
than that of the traditional whole tumor model (AUC, 0.619; 95% CI:
0.446–0.792), and better than that of models containing habitat information, which were the four habitats model (AUC, 0.716; 95% CI:
0.553–0.879), and whole tumor + four habitats model (AUC, 0.663; 95% CI:
0.493–0.833). The
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each model are shown in Fig.
5.Discussion:
Accurate
and noninvasive prediction of IDH status is desirable to improve patients’
treatment management in clinical practice. Intratumor
heterogeneity in gliomas limits the accurate determination of IDH mutation
status to some extent. In this study, we mined the bioinformatics from inhomogeneously
distributed vessel permeability and cell density due to IDH mutation, employing
the MRI habitat analysis on T1-CE and DWI, to improve the predictive accuracy
of IDH mutation. We demonstrated that: (i) the damaged vascular and hypocellular imaging habitat alone performed
best and robustly to predict the IDH mutation; (ii) the prediction model
constructed on the traditional whole tumor model displayed the lowest efficacy
to predict IDH mutation status, the predictive performance of the four habitats
model slightly improved by 16.1% compared
with that of the whole tumor model; (iii) when the whole
tumor and four habitats were combined, the predictive power decreased.
These results demonstrate that habitats generated from T1-CE-derived vascular
habitat and DWI-derived cellular habitat can effectively identify IDH mutation
status.Conclusions:
Vascular-cellular habitats based on T1-CE and
DWI images showed high prediction capabilities for IDH mutation status in gliomas.
The damaged vascular and hypocellular habitat was identified as the sensitive
habitat and potential biomarker for IDH mutation. These findings will be
beneficial for clinical treatment decision-making and patient-tailored therapy
regimens for gliomas.Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants,and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82271948, 82102004),
the Key Laboratory Construction Project of the Guangzhou Science and Technology
(202201020373), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China
(2022YFC2400049).References
1.Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al (2022) CBTRUS Statistical Report:
Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United
States in 2015–2019. Neuro-Oncology 24: v1–v95.
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac202
2. Senhaji N, Squalli Houssaini A, Lamrabet S, et al (2022) Molecular and
Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma. IJMS 23:7474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137474
3.Shih AH, Levine RL (2012) IDH1 Mutations Disrupt Blood, Brain, and
Barriers. Cancer Cell 22:285–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.022
4. Machida Y, Nakagawa M, Matsunaga H, et al (2020) A Potent Blood–Brain
Barrier-Permeable Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor Suppresses the Growth of Glioblastoma
with IDH1 Mutation in a Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft Model. Molecular
Cancer Therapeutics 19:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-1349
5. Salamanca-Cardona L, Shah H, Poot AJ, et al (2017) In Vivo Imaging of
Glutamine Metabolism to the Oncometabolite 2-Hydroxyglutarate in IDH1/2 Mutant
Tumors. Cell Metabolism 26:830-841.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.001
6. Yu K, Hu Y, Wu F, et al (2020) Surveying brain tumor heterogeneity by
single-cell RNA-sequencing of multi-sector biopsies. Natl Sci Rev 7:1306–1318.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa099
7. Venteicher AS, Tirosh I, Hebert C, et al (2017) Decoupling genetics,
lineages, and microenvironment in IDH-mutant gliomas by single-cell RNA-seq.
Science 355: eaai8478. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8478
8.
Chiu F-Y, Yen Y (2023) Imaging biomarkers for clinical applications in
neuro-oncology: current status and future perspectives. Biomark Res 11:35.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00476-7
9. Kim JY, Park JE, Jo Y, et al (2019)
Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model
improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
Neuro-Oncology 21:404–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy133