Zilin Zhou1, Lingxiao Cao1, Yingxue Gao1, Weijie Bao1, Mengyue Tang1, Hailong Li1, Lianqing Zhang1, Huaiqiang Sun1,2, Qiyong Gong3, and Xiaoqi Huang1,2
1Department of Radiology and Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Functional and Molecular lmaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China, 3Department of Radiology, West China Xiamen Hospital of Sichuan University, Xiamen, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Psychiatric Disorders, fMRI (resting state), major depresive disorder
Motivation: The fine-grained anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) subregional functional connectivity alterations in first-episode and recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) remained unclear.
Goal(s): To obtain optimal functional ACC subdivisions and explore alterations in intrinsic functional connectivity of ACC subregional networks in first-episode and recurrent MDD.
Approach: We utilized a data-driven connectivity-based parcellation to obtain optimal ACC subdivisions, calculated ACC subregional functional connectivity, and compared among first-episode, recurrent MDD patients and healthy controls.
Results: Ventral and dorsal ACC per hemisphere were identified as optimal parcellation. The ACC subregional connectivity was reduced in all MDD patients, while dorsal ACC connectivity was significantly reduced only in recurrent patients.
Impact: Our discovery of impaired functional
architectures of ACC subdivisions in MDD, with a more prominent disrupted connectivity of dorsal ACC in relapsed patients, emphasize
a potential role of ACC subregional connectivity in distinguishing MDD at
different episodes
and predicting relapse.
Introduction
The anterior
cingulate cortex (ACC), a
large brain region responsible for emotional processing, cognitive regulation
and homeostatic maintenance, shows substantial functional heterogeneity along
its ventral-dorsal axis1, 2. Growing
neuroimaging evidences support a crucial involvement of the dysconnectivity of ACC
and its subregions in pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD)3, 4. Most
researches exploring functional connectivity of ACC subregional networks used a
priori coordinate or atlas of ACC subregions from previous studies, which may not
fully adapt to the current data and lead to bias.
The well-developed data-driven connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) method allows
segmentation of the ACC based on functional connectivity properties to provide
a better representation of the ACC functional subregions5.
Our research utilized the ACC subdivisions
obtained from CBP method to precisely delineate the fine-grained ACC
subregional functional connectivity alterations in first-episode MDD (FED) and
recurrent MDD (RED).Methods
We recruited 65
medication-free MDD patients (39 FED and 26 RED) and 68 age- and sex- matched
healthy controls (HC). All participants were scanned at rest using the GE Signa
EXCITE 3‐T MR system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee) with an 8‐channel phased‐array head
coil. Preprocessing of neuroimaging data includes slice-timing, realignment, nuisance regression, spatial
normalization (2mm), smoothing
(6mm FWHM), detrending, and filtering (0.01-0.08Hz). The Friston
24-parameter model was used to regress out head motion confounding effects. Connectivity-based
parcellation was conducted using CBPtools6 based on
Python3.7 to segment the entire ACC per hemisphere from automated anatomical
labeling atlas (AAL2) into distinct subdivisions based on their resting-state
functional connectivity (rsFC) patterns with the rest of whole brain
(Figure 1). Briefly, the rsFC between each voxel of ACC and every voxel of the
rest brain was computed for each subject. Then, the k-means
clustering was performed on the connectivity matrices to assign the voxels of
ACC into clusters with similar connectivity characteristics to obtain the
individual ACC parcellations. Next, the group-level clustering was
calculated, containing relabeling individual clustering and computing mode of
relabeled subject-wise clustering. The optimal number of clusters was
determined by clustering quality indicators, including Silhouette index,
Calinski-Harabasz index and Davies-Bouldin index.
The
rsFC map of each ACC subregion obtained was generated for all participants. Analysis of variance
(ANCOVA) was used to evaluate group differences between MDD and HC groups, and
to further investigate group differences among FED, RED and HC groups, both
with age, sex and head motion as covariates. The
significant threshold was set to
Puncorrected <0.005 at voxel-level and PFWE
<0.0125 (0.05/4) at cluster-level. Post-hoc analysis
after ANCOVA among three groups was performed using Bonferroni test in
SPSS24.0, with a significant threshold of P< 0.05. Moreover, relationships
between the observed rsFC
alterations with number of
episodes, illness duration, and symptom severity in MDD group were explored via
partial correlation, controlling for age, sex and head motion.Results
The socio-demographic
and clinical characteristics of the participants were provided in Table 1.
Two
subdivisions of ACC per hemisphere, ventral ACC (vACC) and dorsal ACC (dACC),
were identified as the optimal parcellation according to
cluster quality indicators (Figure 2), and
the rsFC map of each ACC subregion in MDD and HC group were available in Figure
3.
Relative
to HC, MDD patients demonstrated significant hypoconnectivity between left vACC
with left/right hippocampus/temporal pole (TP) and left dorsomedial prefrontal
cortex (dmPFC), between right vACC and right hippocampus/TP, and between left
dACC and left middle temporal gyrus (MTG). After categorizing
patients into FED and RED subgroups, through ANCOVA and post-hoc analysis, we found
significant disrupted rsFC of left vACC with left/right hippocampus/TP and left
dmPFC in both FED and RED patients compared with HC. Additionally, the significant impaired connectivity between bilateral
dACC and bilateral dmPFC, and between left dACC and right MTG were only
observed in RED, relative to FED and HC groups. There was no significant
correlation between the observed rsFC alterations and clinical features after
correcting for multiple comparisons.Discussion & Conclusion
Through data-driven connectivity-based
parcellation, we identified that the ACC is best represented with a bipartite
ventral-dorsal subdivision. We further
discovered disrupted intrinsic connectivity of ACC subregions in MDD relative
to HC, of which the hypoconnectivity of vACC with
hippocampus and dmPFC were significant in MDD patients, while the hypoconnectivity
of dACC with dmPFC and MTG were only significant in relapsed patients. These findings implicated
the intrinsic connectivity of ACC subregions along ventral-dorsal axis was
impaired in MDD patients, with disorganized functional architecture of dACC being
more prominent in patients with relapses, which emphasize the importance of ACC
subregional connectivity in distinguishing MDD with various number of episodes
and provide potential translational neuroimage markers for relapse prediction.Acknowledgements
This study was
supported by the Natural Science Foundation of
Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2022NSFSC0052) and the National
Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF1202400).References
1. Dixon ML, Thiruchselvam R, Todd R, et al. Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(10):1033-81.
2. Gasquoine PG. Localization of function in anterior cingulate cortex: from psychosurgery to functional neuroimaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(3):340-8.
3. Mulders PC, van Eijndhoven PF, Schene AH, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;56:330-44.
4. Pizzagalli DA, Roberts AC. Prefrontal cortex and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):225-46.
5. Eickhoff SB, Yeo BTT, Genon S. Imaging-based parcellations of the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(11):672-86.
6. Reuter N, Genon S, Kharabian Masouleh S, et al. CBPtools: a Python package for regional connectivity-based parcellation. Brain Struct Funct. 2020;225(4):1261-75.