Mahmoud Mostapha1, Dominik Nickel2, Laszlo Lazar3, Nirmal Janardhanan1, Simon Arberet1, Daniel Tobias Boll4, and Mariappan S. Nadar1
1Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, United States, 2Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany, 3Siemens Industry Software România, Brasov, Romania, 4Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Swaziland
Synopsis
Keywords: AI/ML Image Reconstruction, Image Reconstruction
Motivation: GRASP allows for free-breathing DCE-MRI with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, the current 4D iterative reconstruction is slow and still suffers from streaking artifacts, limiting clinical use.
Goal(s): Develop a DL solution that significantly reduces the reconstruction time and improves image quality.
Approach: A model-assisted DL reconstruction combining a sparsity model with an efficient 3D spatiotemporal network for fast and robust reconstruction of accelerated scans with high resolution.
Results: A sparsity-constrained DL-based can provide robust and fast reconstructions with improved image quality, evidenced by the superior quantitative metrics and the qualitative analysis of cases under-represented in the training data.
Impact: GRASP offers high-resolution 4D free-breathing DCE-MRI; however, it still suffers from under-sampling artifacts and long reconstruction times. A model-assisted DL reconstruction can reduce the reconstruction time, improve image quality, and increase system robustness—essential in translating to clinical practice.
Introduction
GRASP is a novel technique where a
golden-angle radial VIBE sequence is combined with temporal compressed sensing
(CS) to allow for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI with high
spatial and temporal resolution [1,2]. However, 4D GRASP reconstruction is
performed with an iterative algorithm, resulting in long reconstruction times
limiting clinical use. Moreover, at higher accelerations and increased resolutions,
reconstructions still suffer from increased under-sampling (streaking)
artifacts. Deep learning (DL) techniques were proposed to tackle such problems
[3]; however, they operate entirely in the image domain and do not use data
consistency (DC), increasing the hallucination risk due to poor generalization
[4]. We propose a model-assisted DL solution for GRASP reconstruction combining
a classical sparsity model to constrain an efficient 3D spatiotemporal network
for fast reconstruction of accelerated scans with high resolution and improved
generalization capability.Methods
We propose a
model-assisted DL-based reconstruction for accelerated GRASP DCE-MRI scans. For
such an ill-posed problem with a limited amount of training data, there is a
need to avoid DL methods' sensitivity to data perturbations and poor
generalization [5]. We emphasize the role of the model in providing a priori
information/constraints to DL components. As shown in Figure 1, starting from a
nonuniform FFT (NUFFT)-reconstruction of the under-sampled time-resolved
images, a CS iterative reconstruction procedure is performed (few
iterations M) with a sparsity enforced by applying undecimated Haar wavelet
constraints. Optimization is performed with the FISTA algorithm [6], with a
high-pass filter preconditioner applied to the gradients to improve convergence
speed. The CS sparsity model is then used to initialize/constrain a
plug-and-play efficient and flexible DL reconstruction.
The proposed DL reconstruction relies upon an N iterations of computationally light CNN and a subsequent DC that can be applied only at
test time or jointly trained end-to-end. Recent 3D medical vision transformers
achieve state-of-the-art performances on several 3D volumetric data benchmarks
[7], driven by the large receptive field for non-local self-attention and the
large number of model parameters. However, adopting such methods for the
spatiotemporal CNN block would be impractical because of long
inference times. Hence, we propose a lightweight 3D CNN with large kernel
depth-wise convolution (3D LK CNN) to simulate hierarchical transformer behavior
while also using pointwise depth-wise feature scaling to control the model
parameters. The DC layers are implemented as a finite number of iterations of
the conjugate gradient (CG) method [8], solving the given system:
$$Hx=b$$ $$H= A^H A+ λI$$ $$b= A^H Dy+ λx_{prior}$$
Where $$$A^H$$$ and $$$A$$$ operators incorporate computationally expensive NUFFT operations, the density compensation function $$$D$$$ is optionally used for preconditioning the linear system to be solved. The regularization parameter $$$λ$$$ can also be trainable (with strictly positive constraints) for a better tradeoff between the CNN and DC layers.Materials and Experimental Setting
Free-breathing 3D abdominal and
brain imaging was performed on seventeen cancer patients with contrast
injection on 1.5T and 3T scanners with standard golden-angle stack-of-stars
radial scheme pulse sequence (8,692 2D+time slices for training, 720 2D+time slices
for testing). The ground truth (target) data were generated by performing
temporally slow CS iterative reconstruction till convergence (~70 iterations)
on time-resolved data (55 spokes/time-point after sorting the continuously
acquired data along with coil compression to 8 virtual coils). Retrospective
under-sampling was performed to 21 spokes/time-point (acceleration factor of
2.6). The CNN networks were trained using complex-L1 loss with M randomly set
to improve generalizability. The proposed 3D LK CNN is compared to a standard
3D UNET developed for similar applications [4]. The importance of incorporating
classical signal models is highlighted by comparing them against models
initialized using NUFFT reconstructions [3]. Results
A quantitative assessment of the
proposed model-assisted DL-based reconstruction using PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS [9]
metrics is provided in Figure 2. Model-assisted networks utilizing 3D LK CNN
outperform competing methods, including those initialized using NUFFT reconstructions
and model-assisted networks using the 3D classical 3D UNET. Similar results
were obtained through qualitative visual inspection of challenging cases, as
shown in Figure 3 (abdominal lesion) and Figure 4 (brain tumor). Figure 5 shows
the contrast dynamics of accelerated DCE-MRI scans in selected ROIs (aorta and
femoral artery) with the proposed methods (sparsity Model+3D LK CNN), providing
the lowest MAE compared to the target.Conclusion
A model-assisted DL-based
reconstruction can accelerate GRASP DCE-MRI scans, reduce reconstruction time,
and improve image quality. Integrating classical signal models with DL for
image reconstruction is necessary to ensure system robustness and generalization
capability for translation to clinical practice. Disclaimer
The
concepts and information presented in this abstract are based on research
results that are not commercially available. Future commercial availability
cannot be guaranteed.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Block,
Kai Tobias, et al. "GRASP: Tackling the challenges of abdominopelvic
DCE-MRI." Magnetom Flash 5 (2014): 16-22.
[2] Feng,
Li, et al. "Golden‐angle radial sparse parallel MRI:
combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden‐angle
radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI." Magnetic
resonance in medicine 72.3 (2014): 707-717.
[3] Jafari,
Ramin, et al. "GRASPNET: Fast spatiotemporal deep learning reconstruction
of golden‐angle radial data for free‐breathing
dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance
imaging." NMR in Biomedicine 36.3 (2023): e4861.
[4] Kofler,
Andreas, et al. "An end‐to‐end‐trainable
iterative network architecture for accelerated radial multi‐coil
2D cine MR image reconstruction." Medical Physics 48.5 (2021): 2412-2425.
[5] Guan,
Yue, et al. "Subspace Model-Assisted Deep Learning for Improved Image
Reconstruction." IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2023).
[6] Beck,
Amir, and Marc Teboulle. "A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding
algorithm for linear inverse problems." SIAM journal on imaging sciences
2.1 (2009): 183-202.
[7] He,
Yufan, et al. "SwinUNETR-V2: Stronger Swin Transformers with Stagewise
Convolutions for 3D Medical Image Segmentation." International Conference
on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Cham: Springer
Nature Switzerland, 2023.
[8]
Hestenes, Magnus R., and Eduard Stiefel. "Methods of conjugate gradients
for solving linear systems." Journal of research of the National Bureau of
Standards 49.6 (1952): 409-436.
[9] Zhang,
Richard, et al. "The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a
perceptual metric." Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision
and pattern recognition. 2018.