Chenye Shen1, Chaoqiang Liu1, Nanguang Chen1, and Anqi Qiu1,2,3
1Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 2Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung hom, Hong Kong, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Functional Connectivity, Aging
Motivation: The healthy aging brain exhibits functional dedifferentiation, yet a consensus on its characterization remains elusive, hindering individual-level assessment of unhealthy aging.
Goal(s): We aim to utilize the functional hierarchical axis to elucidate primary alterations in functional dedifferentiation during healthy aging.
Approach: We developed a measure to quantify the heterogeneity of network dedifferentiation along the functional hierarchical axis, and assessed its relevance to cognition and neurological diseases at an individual level.
Results: Functional dedifferentiation in attention and control networks captures substantial individual differences in aging, cognition, and diseases. The heterogeneity of functional dedifferentiation along the functional hierarchical axis predicts domain-specific disease risk.
Impact: Brain aging primarily entails
association and control network integrity deterioration on the functional
hierarchical axis. The individual differences of functional dedifferentiation
on this axis provide risk assessments of unhealthy brain aging.
Introduction
The healthy aging brain experiences a progressive deterioration in brain
structure and function, contributing to alterations in cognition1. One notable change is the reduced functional
connectivity within functional networks and increased connectivity between
different networks, known as functional network dedifferentiation2. Nevertheless, a
consensus on the precise characterization of functional dedifferentiation in
healthy aging remains elusive. For instance, multiple studies have identified different
aging-sensitive network dedifferentiation centers2-4. Recent studies have
revealed a large-scale functional hierarchical axis, extending from transmodal association
regions to unimodal sensorimotor regions, effectively captures different
aspects of cortical macrostructure, microstructure, and function across lifespan5-9. Therefore, an exploration
of functional dedifferentiation along this specific axis may elucidate the primary
alterations in functional network integrity during aging. We hypothesized that the
heterogeneity in functional network dedifferentiation
would follow this axis and capture individual differences in cognition and
diseases.Methods
This study leveraged demographic, cognitive function tests,
disease diagnosis, and brain imaging data (T1 and rs-fMRI) from the UK Biobank.
Figure 1 outlines the participant selection process. T1 images underwent
FreeSurfer preprocessing, and the rs-fMRI was pre-processed in FSL with slice timing, zero
padding, motion correction, intensity normalization, and
nuisance regression.
We identify the functional hierarchical axis for each individual by Fisher-z transforming and
thresholding the cortical voxel-level functional connectivity matrix at 90% sparsity.
We measured the similarity between all pairs of voxels using cosine distance
and employed diffusion map embedding to identify low-dimensional gradient
components. Procrustes analysis aligned individual gradients with group-averaged
gradients, with the most variance-explaining gradient designated as the hierarchical
axis 5. We assessed the similarity of the group-averaged functional
hierarchical axis at each 1-year age
range in the normal aging population (N=23,051, age=46~80 years) using symmetric
KL-divergence. KL-divergence quantifies the dissimilarity between two probability
distributions, capturing magnitude differences unaddressed by Pearson’s correlation.
Then, a measure of network
dedifferentiation in the principle functional gradient was designed to
summarize within-network aggregation in relation to between-network integration
at the voxel level, as noted in Equation (1):
$$Network Dedifferentiation_i=\frac{(\bar d_i^w-\bar d_i^b)}{max(\bar d_i^w,\bar d_i^b)} $$
where$$$d_i^w$$$ is the average Euclidean distance between voxel and all other voxels within the same
functional network, and $$$d_i^b$$$ is the average Euclidean distance between voxel and all voxels
from other networks. This measure ranges from -1 to +1, with higher values
indicating greater voxel-wise integration across networks along the principle
functional gradient, i.e. greater dedifferentiation. Yeo's 7-network
parcellation was utilized in this study. We investigated age-related network
dedifferentiation in healthy aging using linear regression, controlling for sex
and head motion. We also assessed its cognitive relevance using linear
regression and the ability to distinguish neurodegenerative and psychiatric
diseases using logistic regression, covarying for age, sex, education, and head
motion.Results
Figure 2a exhibits age-related changes in principle functional organization. K-means clustering and silhouette score revealed two distinct groups representing middle-aged to older adults and older adults (Fig. 2b). The group-level principle functional gradient was relatively stable across age, with limbic and default mode networks anchoring the transmodal pole, and visual and somatomotor networks anchoring the unimodal end. Middle-axis networks included dorsal attention, ventral attention, and frontoparietal control. Although not statistically significant (p>0.35), Fig.2c revealed a compressed organization in older adults, with the most pronounced changes in middle-axis systems followed by transmodal and unimodal networks.
Figure 3 shows that both increasing age and poorer performance in most cognitive domains are associated with greater differentiation along the principle functional gradient, particularly between the middle-axis system network and other networks.
Figure 4 demonstrates that dedifferentiation between the middle-axis system and other networks exhibited the strongest predictive power for diverse neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. We also discovered some system-specific diseases relevance. Motor neuron disease and stroke, two diseases that severely impact motor function, were more related to unimodal end dedifferentiation with other networks. Discussion
The dedifferentiation of the
middle segment of the principal functional gradient network exhibits pronounced
age, cognition, and disease-related changes in the aging process. Indeed, the
attention and control network plays a crucial role in bridging perception and
abstract cognitive functions, facilitating the flow of information along the
hierarchical axis. Consequently, a disturbance in the middle-axis system may
impede information processing within the brain, contributing to cognitive
alterations and the onset of diseases. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in
network dedifferentiation may serve as a predictive factor for domain-specific
diseases.Conclusion
The heterogeneity in
functional network dedifferentiation follows the principle functional hierarchy
axis and captures individual differences in cognition and neurological disease risks.
This work provides a valuable reference for future studies on identifying
unsuccessful aging through individual differences in macroscale brain
hierarchy.Acknowledgements
This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under
Application Number 57831. This research/project is supported by the National
Science Foundation (NSF:2010778), the National Research Foundation, Singapore,
and the Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, under
its Prenatal/Early Childhood Grant (Grant No. H22P0M0007), and by the Singapore
Ministry of Education (MOE2019-T2-2-094, T2EP20123-0007, FRC Tier 1).
Additional support is provided by the A*STAR Computational Resource Centre
through the use of its high-performance computing facilities, the Hong Kong
global STEM scholar scheme, the internal fund of the Hong Kong Polytechnic
University, and STI 2030—Major Projects (No.2022ZD0209000). References
1. Hedden T, Gabrieli JD. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:87-96.
2. Chan MY, Park DC, Savalia NK, Petersen SE, Wig GS. Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:E4997-5006.
3. Geerligs L, Renken RJ, Saliasi E, Maurits NM, Lorist MM. A Brain-Wide Study of Age-Related Changes in Functional Connectivity. Cereb Cortex 2015;25:1987-1999.
4. Betzel RF, Byrge L, He Y, Goni J, Zuo XN, Sporns O. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 2014;102 Pt 2:345-357.
5. Margulies DS, Ghosh SS, Goulas A, et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:12574-12579.
6. Zhu J, Margulies D, Qiu A. White matter functional gradients and their formation in adolescence. Cerebral Cortex 2023;33:10770-10783.
7. Dong HM, Margulies DS, Zuo XN, Holmes AJ. Shifting gradients of macroscale cortical organization mark the transition from childhood to adolescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118.
8. Bethlehem RAI, Paquola C, Seidlitz J, et al. Dispersion of functional gradients across the adult lifespan. Neuroimage 2020;222:117299.
9. Audrey L, Valerie JS, Adam P, et al. Functional Connectivity Development along the Sensorimotor-Association Axis Enhances the Cortical Hierarchy. bioRxiv 2023:2023.2007.2020.549090.