Zuozhen Cao1, Mingyang Li1, Zhiyong Zhao1, Yao Shen1, Yiqi Shen1, and Dan Wu1
1Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, HangZhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Aging, Aging, parcellation
Motivation: The human brain undergoes a remarkable development from newborn to adulthood in cortex, white matter, and connectivity in previous studies. We speculated connectivity-based cortical parcellation may also change during this process.
Goal(s): To explore whether and how connectivity-based parcellations of different cortices changed from neonate to adult.
Approach: We utilized diffusion MRI (dMRI) to investigate the structure connectivity-based parcellations of cortical sub-regions and compared the parcellation-related features among infants, toddlers, and adults.
Results: We observed significantly altered parcellation profiles and changing connectivity patterns during developed. Especially, we found larger alternations in high-order cortex, such as insula, compared to primary sensory and motor cortices.
Impact: Connectivity-based
parcellation provided a new insight to assess the development of human brain. Primary
cortex has developed sufficiently in early life while high-order cortex developed
significantly from newborn to adult. Future studies will fill the gap from
toddler to adult.
Introduction
The human brain undergoes a remarkable development from newborn to adult. There have been many studies that characterized the developmental trajectory of cortex, white matter, and structural/functional connectivity(1-3). Connectivity-based parcellation of cortex(4-6) was developed as a data-driven approach to automatically segment sub-regions within cortical area, which provided more detailed information to understand structural and functional characters of the heterogeneous area. However, it is unclear how the parcellation altered during early developed, or different cortical regions experienced different alternation pattern. Therefore, we performed structure connectivity-based parcellation within the primary motor cortex (M1), primary sensory cortex (S1) and insula for subjects in early infancy, late infancy, early toddler, and adult stages.Methods
Data collection: We recruited 126 normal brains from Baby Connectome Project (BCP)
(7), including 40 subjects between 0-6 months, 36 subjects between 7-12 months and 50 subjects between 13-24 months, which were collected on 3T Siemens Prisma scanners. T2-weighted images were acquired using a T2wSPC sequence with resolution = 0.8*0.8*0.8 mm³. dMRI data were acquired using a single-shot EPI sequence with resolution = 1.5*1.5*1.5 mm³, 6 b0, 37 diffusion-weighted images at b=1500 and 3000 s/mm², respectively.
Besides, 67 adults (22-31 years old) from S1200 release of Human Connectome Project (HCP) database (
https://www.humanconnectome.org/) were included. dMRI data were acquired on 3T Siemens Magnetom scanners using a DW-EPI sequence with resolution = 1.25*1.25*1.25 mm³, 18 b0, and 90 diffusion-weighted images at b=1000, 2000, 3000 s/mm², respectively. Here we selected 6 b0, 37 b1000 s/mm², 37 b3000 s/mm² volumes to match BCP data.
Data processing: The processing pipeline is shown in Figure 1. Firstly, to segment the M1, S1 and insula regions, we performed affine and nonlinear registration between individual T2-weighted images and the DK atlas
(8) (M-CRIB atlas
(9) for BCP data). According to the pipeline proposed by Li et al.
(10), we performed probabilistic tractography in FSL
(11) with each voxel in selected cortical region as seed and weighted the fiber density maps with fractional anisotropy (FA) maps. Connectivity matrix and cross-correlation matrix were then calculated. Subsequently, we used spectral clustering to identify sub-regions within each cortex area based on cross-correlation matrices. The number of clusters was assessed by Dice, cramer V (CV) and normalized mutual information (NMI). Within each sub-region, we performed probabilistic fiber tracking and calculated connectivity pattern based on sum of fiber densities in each region of AAL3 atlas
(12). Besides, we quantified the volume fractions of sub-regions in each cortex and compared them between age groups. Lastly, we calculated difference of volume fractions between each stage and adult to quantify the developmental change.
Results
Based on Dice, CV and NMI shown in Figure 2 and prior parcellation-related studies(13, 14), we finally chose optimal cluster numbers of four, three, and two for M1, S1, and insula, respectively,
for optimal and consistent parcellation across age groups.
The connectivity distributions in Figure 3 showed distinct connectivity patterns for different sub-regions. The connectivity distributions in M1 and S1 experienced gradual change. In insula, connectivity distribution showed little variation through 0-24-month-old but large change from early stage to adult.
Quantitative analysis of the sub-region volume fractions (Figure 4) showed a gradual decrease in sub-region 1 in both left and right M1, and an increase in sub-region 2 in left M1. In S1, only sub-region 3 in right hemisphere showed significant differences from 0-2 years to adult. In insula, significant differences were found in all sub-regions between the BCP data and adult, whereas little significant change were found within the first two years of life.
The absolute deviations between each stage and adult stage were shown in Figure 5. We found considerably higher developmental changes in insula compared to M1 and S1.Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, we utilized dMRI to investigate structure connectivity-based parcellations of specific cortices and characterized the parcellation-related features during early development. Results revealed that: 1) the sub-regional parcellation of most cortical areas was dynamically changing due to the change of connectivity. Therefore, it is necessary to generate age-specific sub-regional atlases; 2) Parcellation of primary cortices (M1, S1) experienced early development during the first two years of life and became similar to adult, while high-order cortex (insula) experiences ongoing large reshaping of its connectivity after 2 years old. 3) Volume fraction of each sub-region could be a biomarker to assess the development. Insula showed tremendous changes from neonate to adult while M1 and S1 showed steady changes. These results indicated that primary cortex may have developed sufficiently in the neonatal stage while high-order cortex continued to develop from newborn to adult.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971606, 82122032), and Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2022C03057, 202006140)References
1.Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006;30(6):718-29.
2.Ball WS, Byars AW, Schapiro M, Bommer W, Carr A, German A, et al. Total and regional brain volumes in a population-based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development. Cerebral Cortex. 2012;22(1):1-12.
3.Levman J, MacDonald P, Lim AR, Forgeron C, Takahashi EJHBM. A pediatric structural MRI analysis of healthy brain development from newborns to young adults. Human Brain Mapping. 2017;38(12):5931-42.
4.Johansen-Berg H, Behrens T, Robson M, Drobnjak I, Rushworth M, Brady J, et al. Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(36):13335-40.
5.Li W, Qin W, Liu H, Fan L, Wang J, Jiang T, et al. Subregions of the human superior frontal gyrus and their connections. NeuroImage. 2013;78:46-58.
6.Zhang Y, Fan L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhu M, Zhang Y, et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of the human posteromedial cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2014;24(3):719-27.
7.Howell BR, Styner MA, Gao W, Yap P-T, Wang L, Baluyot K, et al. The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An overview of the study design and protocol development. NeuroImage. 2019;185:891-905.
8.Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006;31(3):968-80.
9.Alexander B, Murray AL, Loh WY, Matthews LG, Adamson C, Beare R, et al. A new neonatal cortical and subcortical brain atlas: the Melbourne Children's Regional Infant Brain (M-CRIB) atlas. NeuroImage. 2017;147:841-51.
10.Li H, Fan L, Zhuo J, Wang J, Zhang Y, Yang Z, et al. ATPP: a pipeline for automatic tractography-based brain parcellation. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2017;11:35.
11.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SMJN. Fsl. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):782-90.
12.Rolls ET, Huang C-C, Lin C-P, Feng J, Joliot MJN. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage. 2020;206:116189.
13.Jakab A, Molnár PP, Bogner P, Béres M, Berényi ELJBt. Connectivity-based parcellation reveals interhemispheric differences in the insula. Brain Topography. 2012;25:264-71.
14.Tian Y, Zalesky AJN. Characterizing the functional connectivity diversity of the insula cortex: Subregions, diversity curves and behavior. Brain Topography. 2018;183:716-33.