xiaoyu jiang1, Manhal Izzy2, Mary Kay Washington2, Junzhong Xu2, and John Gore2
1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Vanderbilt University Medical Center, nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Microstructure, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Motivation: Addressing the unmet need for non-invasive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) diagnosis.
Goal(s): Assessing MRI cytometry’s potential for quantifying alterations in cell sizes and cell densities linked to inflammation, a critical factor in NASH diagnosis.
Approach: Histology-based simulations were used to assess MRI cytometry's performance across various SNR levels in normal and NASH liver tissues. Additionally, used MRI cytometry to distinguish healthy liver from NASH with a clinical 3T scanner.
Results: Both simulations and in vivo data revealed increased cell density and reduced cell sizes in inflammatory areas compared to steatosis and healthy liver tissues.
Impact: Findings of this study establish a strong foundation
for future investigations into the role of non-invasive assessment of liver
cellular characteristics in diagnosing NASH, with the ultimate goal of reducing
the necessity for liver biopsy.
Introduction
The ability
to differentiate NASH from simple steatosis is critically important for the
clinical management of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients [1]. While individuals with
simple steatosis alone are generally thought to have a relatively benign
long-term prognosis, up to a quarter of these patients may develop NASH, which
can progress to cirrhosis [2], a potent
risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The current gold standard for diagnosing and staging NASH involves the
NASH Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) scoring system, which assesses the
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) and fibrosis staging
through liver biopsy. NAS comprises scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation,
and ballooning. A non-invasive method for distinguishing NASH from simple fatty liver, is
essential for patient safety and efficient resource allocation. While MRI-based
Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF) and elastography reliably quantify steatosis [3] and fibrosis [4], respectively, there remains a significant gap in non-invasive methods for assessing
inflammation in NASH. As liver inflammation involves smaller-sized inflammatory
cells (<10 µm) in contrast to hepatocytes (15 – 25 µm), the primary
functional cells in the liver, we propose that MRI cytometry can fill this gap
by quantifying changes in liver cell size and density associated with
inflammation.Methods
Theory: MRI cytometry integrates measurements of water diffusion rates over
various time scales, corresponding to probing cellular microstructures at
different distances [5]. The size range of most relevance in liver is 5 µm
to 25 µm (e.g., hepatocytes ~ 15 – 25 µm, inflammatory cells ~ 5 – 10 µm),
which corresponds to diffusion times of approximately 5 - 70 ms. These
diffusion times can be achieved using a combination of OGSE (oscillating
gradient spin echo) and PGSE (pulsed gradient spin echo) measurements.
Microstructural properties are extracted by fitting multi-b
value-multi-diffusion time fat-suppressed diffusion-weighted MRI signals to a
three-compartment model (blood, intra and extracellular water).
Histology-based simulation: Segmented histological images of normal human liver
tissue, steatosis, and stroma (comprising inflammatory cells and fibrosis) served
as input structures for computer simulations (Figure 1). MRI cytometry analysis was conducted on PGSE and OGSE signals at three SNR levels (10, 20, and 50), generated using
MATI, an in-house diffusion MRI simulation toolbox.
In vivo human imaging: MRI cytometry was also conducted in a healthy subject and a NASH patient using Philips Ingenia
CX 3T scanner with a dStream TorsoCardiac coil. A PGSE sequence with diffusion gradient
duration δ / diffusion gradient separation Δ = 12/74 ms was used to collect
diffusion data at a relatively long diffusion time (70 ms). Shorter diffusion
times were achieved using a cosine-modulated trapezoidal OGSE sequence with
gradient frequencies of 25 and 50 Hz. Five b values (0, 250, 500, 750, and 1000
s/mm2) were used for PGSE and 25 Hz OGSE acquisitions. For 50 Hz
OGSE acquisitions, four b values (0, 100, 200, and 300 s/mm2) were used. The
total scan time ≈ 12 mins. The SNRs of b0 images are about 20. The fat fraction
was measured by a clinical standard mDixon sequence.Results and discussion
Simulation:
MRI-derived average stroma cell sizes and densities significantly exceed those
in steatosis and normal liver tissues at all SNR levels, with variations
increasing at lower SNRs. Differences between steatosis and normal liver
tissues become significant at SNR 50.
In
vivo human imaging: The fitted average cell
size and cell density for a healthy subject were approximately 19 µm, and 15x104/mm3,
respectively, which are consistent with previously reported human hepatocyte
sizes and densities [6, 7]. NASH liver displays uniform high fat content,
inhomogeneous high cell densities, and small cell sizes (Figure 3). The
distribution of cell density of NASH liver is bimodal (Figure 4), likely
representing two different groups of cells. If all voxels from the NASH liver
were divided into two groups by setting a threshold for cell density at 106/mm3,
cell sizes for these two groups are 12 ± 2.4 µm, and 7 ± 1.9 µm, likely
associated with fatty hepatocytes and inflammatory cells, respectively. The
MRI-derived cell size represents the average size of the compartment in which
water molecules are restricted, so the average MRI-derived restriction size of steatosis
is much smaller than the actual size of fatty cells.Conclusion
This
study demonstrates that MRI cytometry can characterize changes in cell size and
cell density associated with liver inflammation using clinical 3T scanners in
under 12 minutes. These findings establish a strong foundation for future
investigations into the role of non-invasive assessment of liver cellular
characteristics in diagnosing NASH, with the ultimate goal of reducing the
necessity for liver biopsy.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kleiner, D.E., et al., Design and validation of a histological
scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology, 2005. 41(6): p. 1313-21.
2. Adams, L.A., P. Angulo, and K.D.
Lindor, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
CMAJ, 2005. 172(7): p. 899-905.
3. Tang, A., et al., Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging
of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis.
Radiology, 2013. 267(2): p. 422-31.
4. Venkatesh, S.K., M. Yin, and R.L.
Ehman, Magnetic resonance elastography of
liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson
Imaging, 2013. 37(3): p. 544-55.
5. Jiang, X., et al., MR cell size imaging with temporal diffusion
spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging, 2021. 77: p. 109-123.
6. de la Iglesia, F.A., et al., Quantitative microscopic evaluation of the
endoplasmic reticulum in developing human liver. Am J Pathol, 1976. 82(1): p. 61-70.
7. Duarte, M.I., et al., Baseline volume data of human liver
parenchymal cell. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol, 1989. 21(2): p. 275-9.