Jeongah Ryu1
1Hanyang University, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Keywords: Musculoskeletal: Cartilage
In the last decade musculoskeletal MRI has unprecedented advances. With 3 Tesla field strength high performance gradients and rapid radiofrequency pulse transmission, advanced multichannel receiver coil and surface coil technologies, quantitative MRI techniques and radiomics, MR fingerprinting, synthetic contrast generation, parallel imaging, compressed sensing, simultaneous multislice acquisition techniques have been developed. Deep learning and artificial intelligence algorithms can enhance MRI with unparalleled gains in image speed and quality without signal-to-noise loss. These advances brought challenges too. In this educational lecture we will look around these issues centering around the fundamentals including definitions, advantages, and clinical applications.
Computational MRI
1.
Quantitative MRI
Quantitative
MRI techniques are variable methods to find the information about
microstructural tissue characteristics, those are not accessible by
conventional qualitative MRI (1). The microscopic changes of tissues cause the
changes of the T1rho, T2, T2* relaxation times and so on and it can be
quantitatively measured and visualized on the parameter maps with these
techniques. With evaluation of these disease-driven changes, we can evaluation
the cartilage and muscle composition, and joint inflammation objectively (1).
There are some challenges for adopting and using quantitative MRI in
musculoskeletal MRI, including long scan time. However, thanks to the recent
advances of MR science quantitative MRI is promising.
2.
Radiomics
Radiomics
is the automated process to extract features from digital medical images to
support decision-making (2). When we extract large amounts of features from MR
images and combine them with clinical, biological, genetic data, we can build
diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive model with them. Radiomics makes
segmentation very fast and precisely so it can reduce our huge work of quantitative
analysis. Owing to no need of additional scans for radiomics, it can be easily
integrated into the workflow. Radiomics can uncover hidden patterns of specific
information of MR images those human eyes cannot perceive (2, 3). MRI-based
radiomics model with a machine learning is also promising (3).
3.
MR Fingerprinting
MR
Fingerprinting is an image generation framework for acquisition of multiple
quantitative property maps with a single scan (4). With MRF technique we can
quantify multiple tissue properties like proton density, T1, T2, T2* relaxation
times, and field inhomogeneity at once (5). Using a various flip angles and
repetition times we can get the transient signal of parameters and generate a
unique ‘fingerprint’ with it, and pattern matching with a predefined dictionary
of simulated signal evolutions is efficient and accurate to determine various
tissue properties (4. 5). Recently there have been many technical developments
for MRF, including sequence optimization, improved reconstruction algorithms,
partial volume separation, and deep learning (6).
4.
Synthetic contrast generation
Synthetic
contrast generation is emerging promising technique in musculoskeletal MRI;
making additional conventional contrast images from one or more sequences
without requiring additional acquisition time, enhancing conventional contrast
images to be easier to detect pathology, and putting quantitative imaging into
clinical routine without requiring additional scan time are possible (7). There
are three methodologies: mathematical image transformation, MR physics-based
approach, and data-driven synthetic contrast generation (7). Quantitative MRI
can be accelerated with synthetic contrast generation, and independent of the
used MR scanner, coil, and acquisition techniques (7). Conventional Accelerated MR Reconstruction
5.
Optimization of parameters in 3T MRI
3T
MR system has many advantages including high-performance gradients systems and
radiofrequency pulse transmission technology, advanced multichannel receiver
technology, and high-end surface coils (8). Compared with 1.5 T, 3.0-T MRI
systems can achieve approximately 2-fold higher signal-to-noise ratios,
enabling 4 times faster data acquisition or double the matrix size (8). Thanks
to this powerful 3T MRI, we can get better quantitative MRI. The first and most
widely accessible techniques of acceleration of MRI in musculoskeletal imaging
is to optimize the pulse sequence parameters (9).
6.
Parallel Imaging technique
Parallel
imaging is one of the most accessible advanced acceleration techniques for
musculoskeletal MRI examinations (10). With sampling only every second
phase-encoding step we can save 50% of acquisition time (10). With use of
parallel imaging technique and reduced repetition times and spatial resolution,
twofold acceleration of 2D FSE and TSE pulse sequences can make abbreviated
5-minute knee and shoulder MRIs possible (11). It also makes 3D FSE and TSE
pulse sequences clinically feasible with acquisition times of 5 minutes and
less (11).
7.
Compressed Sensing technique
Data
redundancy of MR images can be used to reduce the sampling rate of
phase-encoding direction. When it be compactly represented in some transform
domains, it is close to the concept of “sparsity” (12). Compressed sensing technique
allows accurate reconstruction from sparsely sampled k-space data (12). Compressed
sensing technique uses nonlinear undersampling patterns and recovers missing
data during image reconstruction (11). Although parallel imaging acceleration is
usually limited to acceleration factor of 3, compressed sensing enables
acceleration factor of 8 (11). Compressed sensing has become the essential
tools in musculoskeletal MRI (11).
8.
Simultaneous Multislice acquisition
Acceleration
in data acquisition using Simultaneous Multislice acquisition is the same to
the number of simultaneously excited slices (13). This technique has only a
marginal intrinsic signal loss and at fixed echo time full acceleration is
achievable (13). Combination of simultaneous multislice acceleration and
parallel imaging is desirable because it has minimal signal-to-noise ratio
penalty but increases the specific absorption rate, whereas parallel imaging
results in signal loss but specific absorption rate does not increase (11). And
this combination permits the design of a 5-minute knee MRI protocol (11). Deep-Learning Application in Musculoskeletal MRI
9.
Deep Learning-based Fast Superresolution MRI
In the last decade the advances in 3T MRI hardware
and potent pulse sequences techniques achieved amazingly reduced acquisition
time of conventional MRI in musculoskeletal imaging (14). But at the same time,
we encountered the signal-to-noise limits of temporal, spatial, and contrast
resolution because of the high-level acceleration (15). Emerging novel deep
learning image reconstruction methods can enhance MR images with unparalleled
gains in image speed and quality without signal-to-noise loss (14). The uncountable
potential of deep learning–based image reconstruction promises to fast
super-resolution musculoskeletal MRI such as a total acquisition time of 2–3
minutes for entire MRI examinations of joints without sacrificing spatial
resolution or image quality (15).
10.
Challenges and Future Directions
Deep
learning-base MRI technologies are not yet widely used in clinical practice.
For this, widespread implementation and clinical validation is required (14).
According
to increase of the MRI workflows with big data, artificial intelligence, and sophisticated
image analysis applications, the use of data set availability and network
stability is becoming increasingly important for both clinical and research
purposes (15). Newly developing vendor-neutral sequences of
quantitative MRI will enhance the reliability of multicenter clinical trials (16).Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Eck BL, Yang M, Elias JJ,
et al. Quantitative MRI for Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disease: Cartilage
and Muscle Composition, Joint Inflammation, and Biomechanics in Osteoarthritis.
Invest Radiol 2023; 58: 60–75.
2. Richardson ML, Amini B,
Kinahan PE. Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Radiol Clin N Am 2022; 60: 339–358.
3. Fritz B, Yi PH, Kijowski
R, Fritz J. Radiomics and Deep Learning for Disease Detection in
Musculoskeletal Radiology: An Overview of Novel MRI- and CT-Based Approaches. Invest
Radiol 2023;58: 3–13.
4. Poorman
ME, Martin MN, Ma D, et al. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Part 1: Potential Uses,
Current Challenges, and Recommendations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020; 51 :675–692.
5. Hong T, Han D, Kim D.
Simultaneous estimation of PD, T1, T2, T2*, and ΔB0 using magnetic resonance
fingerprinting with background gradient compensation. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 81:
2614–2623.
6. McGivney
DF, Boyacioğlu R, Jiang Y,
et al. Magnetic
Resonance Fingerprinting Review Part 2: Technique and Directions. J Magn Reson Imaging.
2020; 51: 993–1007.
7. Hilbert T, Omoumi P,
Raudner M, Kober T. Synthetic Contrasts in Musculoskeletal MRI: A Review.
Invest Radiol 2023; 58: 111-119.
8. Khodarahmi I, Fritz J. The
Value of 3 Tesla Field Strength for Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Invest Radiol 2021;56: 749–763.
9. Grande FD, Guggenberger R,
Fritz J. Rapid Musculoskeletal MRI in 2021: Value and Optimized Use of Widely
Accessible Techniques. AJR 2021; 216: 704–717.
10. Deshmane A, Gulani V,
Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36:
55-72.
11. Fritz J,
Guggenberger R, Grande FD. Rapid Musculoskeletal MRI in 2021: Clinical Application of
Advanced Accelerated Techniques. AJR 2021; 216: 718–733.
12. Ye JC. Compressed sensing
MRI: a review from signal processing perspective. Biomedical Engineering 2019; 1:
8.
13. Barth M, Breuer F,
Koopmans PJ, et al. Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn
Reson Med. 2016; 75: 63–81.
14. Kijowski R, Fritz J. Emerging
Technology in Musculoskeletal MRI and CT. Radiology 2023; 306: 6–19.
15. Lin DJ, Walter SS, Fritz
J. Artificial Intelligence–Driven Ultra-Fast Superresolution MRI: 10-Fold
Accelerated Musculoskeletal Turbo Spin Echo MRI Within Reach. Invest Radiol
2023; 58: 28–42.
16. Karakuzu A, Biswas L,
Cohen-Adad J, Stikov N. Vendor-neutral sequences and fully transparent
workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI. Magn Reson
Med. 2022; 88: 1212–1228.