Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi1 and Naranamangalam R. Jagannathan2
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India, 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute Technology Madras, Chennai, India
Synopsis
Keywords: Prostate, Prostate, Prostate Cancer, Multiparametric MRI, New MR Sequences
This educational abstract will go through the
more recent MRI pulse sequences that are being developed for the early detection and better characterization of prostate cancer (PCa). By
incorporating cutting-edge multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) approaches into
the diagnostic workup, it is possible to address current challenges with serum
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level based screening, problems with
overdiagnosis with random biopsy, and multifocality of the PCa. Due to high
negative predictive value of mpMRI, it not only improves the diagnosis of
clinically significant PCa but also aids in lowering the number of unnecessary biopsies.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) has long been associated
to inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity 1. Other problems with the current PCa diagnostic
pathway include the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent
tumors due to challenges associated with serum prostate-specific antigen
(PSA)-based screening and standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-biopsies.
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has become a key diagnostic
method for PCa risk stratification, detection of transition zone (TZ) tumors,
detection of clinically significant PCa, and PCa staging over the past ten
years 2. A high-resolution T2-weighted (T2W)-MRI
(transverse, coronal, and sagittal orientations), diffusion-weighted imaging
(DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, and/or magnetic resonance
spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) are some of the regularly utilized prostate mpMRI sequences. The most recent Cochrane meta-analysis, PROMIS trials, MRI-FIRST trials, and
other studies back up the assertion that MRI provides the best diagnostic
accuracy for identifying clinically significant PCa when compared to the
standard TRUS-guided biopsy 2-5. Despite advancements, mpMRI still has
inter-observer variability in the interpretation of mpMRI, high cost, inconsistent
image quality, and a moderate level of specificity in the TZ PCa.
As
a result of these concerns, various groups have been developing new MRI
methodologies and sequences to improve PCa diagnosis. The purpose of this
educational exhibit is to provide a brief overview of novel MR sequences as well
as various emerging methods for the treatment and diagnosis of PCa.
Novel prostate MR sequences and descriptions:
Intravoxel
Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Imaging for PCa
Two
non-exchanging compartments, vascular (water in the capillaries or blood
vessels) and non-vascular, are used in this potential diffusion modeling
technique (water in and around cells). When evaluated at low b-values (such as
0-100 s/mm2), the IVIM model provides additional information in the signal equation
due to perfusion which is shown to be useful in PCa 6.
Prostate
MRI Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI)
The RSI technique is one of the advanced diffusion-based
techniques that use a multishell diffusion acquisition with a range of
b-values as part of its DW modeling process. The RSI can quantify non-Gaussian
diffusion in tissue microstructures using a linear mixture model 7, 8. RSI is
used to isolate signals from highly restricted and isotropic water in PCa and can
provide information about nuclear volume fraction, cellular size, etc.
VERDICT
MRI for PCa
The Vascular, Extracellular, and
Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors (VERDICT) assigns the DWI
signal to three principal components: (a) intracellular water (S1), (b) water
in the extracellular extravascular space (S2), and (c) vascular water in the
capillary network (S3) 9. This is done by
fitting the diffusion models with different diffusion times and diffusion
weightings. VERDICT provides quantitative information regarding cell density,
size of cells, intra- and extracellular volume fractions, as well as
pseudo-diffusivity associated with blood flow, which are not provided by ADC
and IVIM models.
Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C-MRI)
It is
possible to detect [1-13C] lactate production in PCa through hyperpolarized
magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C-MRI) following intravenous
administration of hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate. The polarization is
transferred from an electron to the target molecule via dynamic nuclear
polarization, the predominant hyperpolarization technique, at extremely low
temperatures and high magnetic fields 10, 11. C-13 probes are magnetized by hyperpolarized
(HP) 13C MRI, which also offers unique metabolic data pertinent to
heart and cancer disorders.
T2
maps and Luminal water imaging (LWI)
Several T2W images taken at various echo times can
be combined to create T2 maps. To address the subjective nature of T2W,
quantitative T2 maps can be helpful. Sabouri et al. developed LWI through the
use of a three-dimensional multi-echo spin-echo technique 12.
To measure different T2 components, the signal was fitted to an exponential
multi-exponential function (using regularized non-negative least squares). By
using this technique, luminal water fraction (LWF), which denotes the
fractional volume of the luminal space, may be determined 12.
Hybrid multi-dimensional MRI (HM-MRI)
The prostate
tissue is made up of three distinct components: epithelium, stroma, and lumen. The
differential diffusivity of these glandular divisions can provide insight into
a number of prostatic disorders 13. Assessing changes in ADC and T2 values in
response to variations in time to echo and b-values is the basis of HM-MRI.
Additionally, prostatic tissue compositions can be non-invasively evaluated
using HM-MRI by utilizing a mathematical model 14.
Amide proton transfer (APT) MR imaging
CEST is a molecular imaging technique that
measures the proton exchange between bulk water and proton in smaller
metabolites 15. APT MRI has the potential to detect PCa.
MR Fingerprinting
MR
fingerprinting (MRF) allows for the simultaneous measurement of T1, T2, and
proton density quantitative maps 16.
The distinctive nature of tissue is provided by the signal evolution or
"fingerprints".
There has been tremendous progress made in the
field of image analysis in addition to improvements in MR sequences. In the field of radiomics and
radiogenomics, and advances in artificial intelligence, including machine
learning and deep learning, are increasingly being used for the reconstruction,
segmentation, and characterization of PCa lesions 17, 18. It is necessary
that these novel methods be prospectively validated by collecting high-quality
data and reproducible results prior to their incorporation into prostate mpMRI
and clinical practice. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE,
Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33.
2. Dwivedi DK,
Jagannathan NR. Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer
by multiparametric MRI. MAGMA. 2022;35(4):587-608.
3. Drost FH, Osses
DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate MRI, with
or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate
cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012663.
4. Norris JM, Carmona
Echeverria LM, Bott SRJ, Brown LC, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, et al. What Type
of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic
Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort. Eur Urol.
2020;78(2):163-70.
5. Rouviere O, Puech
P, Renard-Penna R, Claudon M, Roy C, Mege-Lechevallier F, et al. Use of
prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in
biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired
diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):100-9.
6. Chandarana H,
Kang SK, Wong S, Rusinek H, Zhang JL, Arizono S, et al. Diffusion-weighted
intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic
correlation. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(12):688-96.
7. Rakow-Penner RA, White
NS, Parsons JK, Choi HW, Liss MA, Kuperman JM, et al. Novel technique for
characterizing prostate cancer utilizing MRI restriction spectrum imaging:
proof of principle and initial clinical experience with extraprostatic
extension. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015;18(1):81-5.
8. White NS,
Leergaard TB, D'Arceuil H, Bjaalie JG, Dale AM. Probing tissue microstructure
with restriction spectrum imaging: Histological and theoretical validation. Hum
Brain Mapp. 2013;34(2):327-46.
9. Panagiotaki E,
Walker-Samuel S, Siow B, Johnson SP, Rajkumar V, Pedley RB, et al. Noninvasive
quantification of solid tumor microstructure using VERDICT MRI. Cancer Res.
2014;74(7):1902-12.
10. Ardenkjaer-Larsen
JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, et al. Increase in
signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2003;100(18):10158-63.
11. Kurhanewicz J,
Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Bankson JA, Brindle K, Cunningham CH, et al.
Hyperpolarized (13)C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology. Neoplasia.
2019;21(1):1-16.
12. Sabouri S, Chang
SD, Savdie R, Zhang J, Jones EC, Goldenberg SL, et al. Luminal Water Imaging: A
New MR Imaging T2 Mapping Technique for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Radiology.
2017;284(2):451-9.
13. Langer DL, van der
Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Plotkin A, Trachtenberg J, Wilson BC, et al. Prostate
tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between
ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. Radiology. 2010;255(2):485-94.
14. Chatterjee A,
Bourne RM, Wang S, Devaraj A, Gallan AJ, Antic T, et al. Diagnosis of Prostate
Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using
Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study. Radiology.
2018;287(3):864-73.
15. Vinogradov E,
Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. CEST: from basic principles to applications,
challenges and opportunities. J Magn Reson. 2013;229:155-72.
16. Ma D, Gulani V,
Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, et al. Magnetic resonance
fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495(7440):187-92.
17. Stoyanova R,
Takhar M, Tschudi Y, Ford JC, Solorzano G, Erho N, et al. Prostate cancer
radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics. Transl Cancer Res.
2016;5(4):432-47.
18. Udayakumar D, Zhang Z, Xi Y, Dwivedi DK, Fulkerson M,
Haldeman S, et al. Deciphering Intratumoral Molecular Heterogeneity in Clear
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with a Radiogenomics Platform. Clin Cancer Res.
2021;27(17):4794-806.