5384

Recent advancements in multiparametric MRI methods for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer
Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi1 and Naranamangalam R. Jagannathan2
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India, 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute Technology Madras, Chennai, India

Synopsis

Keywords: Prostate, Prostate, Prostate Cancer, Multiparametric MRI, New MR Sequences

This educational abstract will go through the more recent MRI pulse sequences that are being developed for the early detection and better characterization of prostate cancer (PCa). By incorporating cutting-edge multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) approaches into the diagnostic workup, it is possible to address current challenges with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level based screening, problems with overdiagnosis with random biopsy, and multifocality of the PCa. Due to high negative predictive value of mpMRI, it not only improves the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa but also aids in lowering the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) has long been associated to inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity 1. Other problems with the current PCa diagnostic pathway include the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent tumors due to challenges associated with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-biopsies.
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has become a key diagnostic method for PCa risk stratification, detection of transition zone (TZ) tumors, detection of clinically significant PCa, and PCa staging over the past ten years 2. A high-resolution T2-weighted (T2W)-MRI (transverse, coronal, and sagittal orientations), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, and/or magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) are some of the regularly utilized prostate mpMRI sequences. The most recent Cochrane meta-analysis, PROMIS trials, MRI-FIRST trials, and other studies back up the assertion that MRI provides the best diagnostic accuracy for identifying clinically significant PCa when compared to the standard TRUS-guided biopsy 2-5. Despite advancements, mpMRI still has inter-observer variability in the interpretation of mpMRI, high cost, inconsistent image quality, and a moderate level of specificity in the TZ PCa.
As a result of these concerns, various groups have been developing new MRI methodologies and sequences to improve PCa diagnosis. The purpose of this educational exhibit is to provide a brief overview of novel MR sequences as well as various emerging methods for the treatment and diagnosis of PCa.

Novel prostate MR sequences and descriptions:
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Imaging for PCa
Two non-exchanging compartments, vascular (water in the capillaries or blood vessels) and non-vascular, are used in this potential diffusion modeling technique (water in and around cells). When evaluated at low b-values (such as 0-100 s/mm2), the IVIM model provides additional information in the signal equation due to perfusion which is shown to be useful in PCa 6.

Prostate MRI Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI)
The RSI technique is one of the advanced diffusion-based techniques that use a multishell diffusion acquisition with a range of b-values as part of its DW modeling process. The RSI can quantify non-Gaussian diffusion in tissue microstructures using a linear mixture model 7, 8. RSI is used to isolate signals from highly restricted and isotropic water in PCa and can provide information about nuclear volume fraction, cellular size, etc.

VERDICT MRI for PCa
The Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors (VERDICT) assigns the DWI signal to three principal components: (a) intracellular water (S1), (b) water in the extracellular extravascular space (S2), and (c) vascular water in the capillary network (S3) 9. This is done by fitting the diffusion models with different diffusion times and diffusion weightings. VERDICT provides quantitative information regarding cell density, size of cells, intra- and extracellular volume fractions, as well as pseudo-diffusivity associated with blood flow, which are not provided by ADC and IVIM models.

Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C-MRI)
It is possible to detect [1-13C] lactate production in PCa through hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C-MRI) following intravenous administration of hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate. The polarization is transferred from an electron to the target molecule via dynamic nuclear polarization, the predominant hyperpolarization technique, at extremely low temperatures and high magnetic fields 10, 11. C-13 probes are magnetized by hyperpolarized (HP) 13C MRI, which also offers unique metabolic data pertinent to heart and cancer disorders.

T2 maps and Luminal water imaging (LWI)
Several T2W images taken at various echo times can be combined to create T2 maps. To address the subjective nature of T2W, quantitative T2 maps can be helpful. Sabouri et al. developed LWI through the use of a three-dimensional multi-echo spin-echo technique 12. To measure different T2 components, the signal was fitted to an exponential multi-exponential function (using regularized non-negative least squares). By using this technique, luminal water fraction (LWF), which denotes the fractional volume of the luminal space, may be determined 12.

Hybrid multi-dimensional MRI (HM-MRI)
The prostate tissue is made up of three distinct components: epithelium, stroma, and lumen. The differential diffusivity of these glandular divisions can provide insight into a number of prostatic disorders 13. Assessing changes in ADC and T2 values in response to variations in time to echo and b-values is the basis of HM-MRI. Additionally, prostatic tissue compositions can be non-invasively evaluated using HM-MRI by utilizing a mathematical model 14.

Amide proton transfer (APT) MR imaging
CEST is a molecular imaging technique that measures the proton exchange between bulk water and proton in smaller metabolites 15. APT MRI has the potential to detect PCa. MR Fingerprinting MR fingerprinting (MRF) allows for the simultaneous measurement of T1, T2, and proton density quantitative maps 16. The distinctive nature of tissue is provided by the signal evolution or "fingerprints".

There has been tremendous progress made in the field of image analysis in addition to improvements in MR sequences. In the field of radiomics and radiogenomics, and advances in artificial intelligence, including machine learning and deep learning, are increasingly being used for the reconstruction, segmentation, and characterization of PCa lesions 17, 18. It is necessary that these novel methods be prospectively validated by collecting high-quality data and reproducible results prior to their incorporation into prostate mpMRI and clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33.

2. Dwivedi DK, Jagannathan NR. Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI. MAGMA. 2022;35(4):587-608.

3. Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012663.

4. Norris JM, Carmona Echeverria LM, Bott SRJ, Brown LC, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, et al. What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):163-70.

5. Rouviere O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, Claudon M, Roy C, Mege-Lechevallier F, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):100-9.

6. Chandarana H, Kang SK, Wong S, Rusinek H, Zhang JL, Arizono S, et al. Diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(12):688-96.

7. Rakow-Penner RA, White NS, Parsons JK, Choi HW, Liss MA, Kuperman JM, et al. Novel technique for characterizing prostate cancer utilizing MRI restriction spectrum imaging: proof of principle and initial clinical experience with extraprostatic extension. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015;18(1):81-5.

8. White NS, Leergaard TB, D'Arceuil H, Bjaalie JG, Dale AM. Probing tissue microstructure with restriction spectrum imaging: Histological and theoretical validation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(2):327-46.

9. Panagiotaki E, Walker-Samuel S, Siow B, Johnson SP, Rajkumar V, Pedley RB, et al. Noninvasive quantification of solid tumor microstructure using VERDICT MRI. Cancer Res. 2014;74(7):1902-12.

10. Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(18):10158-63.

11. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Bankson JA, Brindle K, Cunningham CH, et al. Hyperpolarized (13)C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology. Neoplasia. 2019;21(1):1-16.

12. Sabouri S, Chang SD, Savdie R, Zhang J, Jones EC, Goldenberg SL, et al. Luminal Water Imaging: A New MR Imaging T2 Mapping Technique for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Radiology. 2017;284(2):451-9.

13. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Plotkin A, Trachtenberg J, Wilson BC, et al. Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. Radiology. 2010;255(2):485-94.

14. Chatterjee A, Bourne RM, Wang S, Devaraj A, Gallan AJ, Antic T, et al. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study. Radiology. 2018;287(3):864-73.

15. Vinogradov E, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. CEST: from basic principles to applications, challenges and opportunities. J Magn Reson. 2013;229:155-72.

16. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495(7440):187-92.

17. Stoyanova R, Takhar M, Tschudi Y, Ford JC, Solorzano G, Erho N, et al. Prostate cancer radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics. Transl Cancer Res. 2016;5(4):432-47.

18. Udayakumar D, Zhang Z, Xi Y, Dwivedi DK, Fulkerson M, Haldeman S, et al. Deciphering Intratumoral Molecular Heterogeneity in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with a Radiogenomics Platform. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(17):4794-806.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
5384
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/5384