James A. Tranos1, Ayesha Das2, Jin Zhang2, Sonia Hafeez1, Suleiman Khan1, Neelam Pandya1, Sungheon Gene Kim2, and Youssef Zaim Wadghiri1
1Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Contrast Agent, Preclinical, Gadolinium Based Contrast Agent, Luminescence Quantification, Plasma Clearance Kinetics
Gadolinium
based contrast agents (GBCA) are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging and
are paramount to cancer diagnostics. Furthermore, accurate quantification of
gadolinium in blood/plasma (clinical media) is essential to tumor
pharmacokinetic analysis, with current methods being low throughput and
clinically unavailable. As such, we have developed a simple luminescence
quantification assay to measure the concentration of gadolinium in clinical
media using a sensitized GBCA referred to as Gd[DTPA-cs124]. Here, we demonstrate
the efficacy, increased relaxivity and enhanced biocompatibility of our agent when
compared to other GBCA’s, as well as its ability to model pharmacokinetic
clearance in a mouse model.
Introduction
Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA) are widely used in magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and are especially important for early diagnoses of
diseases such as cancer.1 The use of GBCA’s also extends to grading
tumors or assessing tumor treatment response, by measuring contrast delivery to
and from tumors.2, 3 However, accurate measurement of GBCA’s in
tissue remains challenging due to uncertainties in multiple factors.3,4,5
A potential solution to this issue is to use a bimodal GBCA that can be
quantified via MRI contrast enhancement as well as luminescence intensity. In
the past a sensitized ligand known as DTPA-cs124 had been studied as an optical
probe for detecting luminescent lanthanides outside the context of MRI.6
More recently, Russel et al. was able to demonstrate the use of this probe to
detect gadolinium in mouse plasma with a Förster Resonance Energy Transfer
(FRET) assay using a luminescent probe (Tb[DTPA]) in the presence of
Gd[DTPA-cs124].7 However, this method does not account for or
explain the transmetallation occurring between these two metals in-situ. Alternatively,
a controlled metal displacement assay between Gd[DTPA-cs124] and terbium can be
utilized to transform an otherwise non-luminescent complex (Gd[DTPA-cs124]) into
a long-lived, highly luminescent species (Tb[DTPA-cs124]), thereby offering luminescence quantification as a secondary method to measuring the
concentration of gadolinium (Figure 1). Here we investigate the effectiveness
of Gd[DTPA-cs124] as a bimodal MRI contrast agent that can be used to measure
the concentration of gadolinium in blood and plasma via luminescence.Methods
The synthesis and purification of DTPA-cs124 and its chelates were
performed using modified methods described by Russel et al.7
Standard Curves: The luminescence assay was carried out at pH 7 by mixing
known amounts of Gd[DTPA-cs124] along the concentration interval of 0.1 nM to 1
mM with an ICPMS standard solution of Tb(NO3)3 diluted to 1mM.
Standard Curves were obtained for human blood (5%), human plasma (5%), mouse
blood (5%), and aqueous buffer. All luminescence measurements were acquired in
triplicate with excitation/emission at 330/545 nm, a 100 µs read delay and 1900
µs integration time using a Biotek H1MF plate reader.
Chelate Stability Measurements: All measurements were taken on a Bruker
Minispec at 60 MHz following a modified protocol described by Laurent et al.8
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 4- to 6-week C57/BL6 mice were used for MRI
experiments. To illustrate the in-vivo contrast enhancement and qualitative
biodistribution of Gd[DTPA-cs124], a bolus of Gd[DTPA-cs124] was injected at a
dose of 0.1 mmol/kg via a tail vein (n = 3). The same imaging protocol was
acquired in another animal serving as a reference with an injection of Gd[DTPA],
at the same dose (n = 1).
Transmetallation Assay to Measure Plasma
Clearance: 4- to 6-week C57/BL6 mice (n = 5) were administered a bolus
injection of Gd[DTPA-cs124] at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg via tail vein. Blood samples
were obtained from each mouse at various time points post injection. Blood
samples were prepared and measured following the assay method described above, and luminescence
intensity measurements were plotted against a standard curve to infer the
concentration of Gadolinium in each sample.Results
The
r1 of Gd[DTPA-cs124] at 60 MHz was found to be 5.09 ± 0.02 s-1
mM-1 in aqueous buffer at 37.5 °C, and the stability index (SI) calculated
as a normalized ratio from the competitive cation assay was 0.676 ± 0.015 (Figure
2). A strong linear correlation between relaxivity and molecular weight was
established for all the contrast agents studied (R2 = 0.927, p =
0.987, Table 1). The limits of detection of Gd[DTPA-cs124] in each media were
as follows: 0.46 nM for aqueous buffer, 0.43 nM for 5% human plasma, 3.02 nM
for 5% human blood and 148.67 nM for 5% mouse blood (Figure 3). Using a
Wilcoxon signed rank test, the limits of detection between aqueous buffer and
human plasma were not significantly different (W = 252, p = 0.20). However, the
limits of detection between aqueous buffer and human blood (W = 0, p <
0.001) as well as human plasma and human blood were (W = 0, p < 0.001). The fast
and slow half-lives calculated from the plasma clearance measurements acquired
using our quantification assay were 4.5, and 105.0 minutes respectively (Figure
5).Discussion/Conclusion
While
the increase in relaxivity when comparing Gd[DTPA-cs124] to Gd[DTPA] is
explained by the strong linear relationship between r1 and molecular
weight, the increase in stability is most likely attributed to an increase in
rigidity of the chelate (Figure 2).9 These findings imply that similar
chemical modification to other clinically approved GBCA’s may enhance their relaxivity
and biocompatibility, while providing them with the ability to serve as a
bimodal tracer. Furthermore, our assay shows sensitivity to the nanomolar range,
and is reflected by the limits of detection measured in aqueous buffer, human plasma,
and human blood (Figure 3). Additionally, mice administered Gd[DTPA-c124]
exhibited successful signal enhancement and in-vivo clearance when compared to
reference images acquired using gadopentetic acid (Gd[DTPA]) (Figure 4). Finally,
our assay provides half-lives that agree with previously reported GBCA
clearance data in mice, measured using Gd-153 radiolabeled gadopentetic acid,
where the fast clearance half-life was measured to be between 5-6 min (Figure
5).10Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NSF-DMREF under Award Number DMR 1728858, NSF-MRSEC Program under Award Number DMR 1420073, the NYU Shiffrin-Myers Breast Cancer Discovery Fund, NIH/NCI R01CA160620, and the NYU CTSA grant UL1 TR000038 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health. The majority of this work was performed at the NYU Langone Health Preclinical Imaging Laboratory, a shared resource partially supported by the NIH/SIG 1S10OD018337-01, the Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center Support Grant, NIH/NCI 5P30CA016087, and the NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center Grant NIH P41 EB017183. The authors would like to thank G&M, the members of the Radiochemistry lab at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, as well as the labs of Youssef Z. Wadghiri, Sungheon Gene Kim, Dan Turnbull, and Jiangyang Zhang for their continued support and feedback during the evolution of our work.
References
(1) Choyke PL, Dwyer AJ, Knopp MV. Functional tumor imaging
with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2003, 17 (5), 509-520. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10304.
(2) Ramalho J, Semelka RC, Ramalho M, Nunes RH, AlObaidy M, Castillo M. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Accumulation and Toxicity: An
Update. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016, 37 (7), 1192-1198. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4615.
(3) Bharadwaj Das A, Tranos JA, Zhang J, Wadghiri YZ, Kim SG. Estimation of Contrast Agent Concentration in DCE-MRI Using 2 Flip
Angles. Investigative Radiology 2022. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000845.
(4) Knowles BR, Batchelor PG, Parish V, Ginks M, Plein S, Razavi R, Schaeffter T. Pharmacokinetic modeling of delayed gadolinium
enhancement in the myocardium. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2008, 60 (6), 1524-1530. DOI:
10.1002/mrm.21767.
(5) Harrigan CJ, Peters DC, Gibson CM, Maron BJ, Manning WJ, Maron MS, Appelbaum E. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: quantification
of late gadolinium enhancement with contrast-enhanced cardiovascular MR
imaging. Radiology 2011, 258 (1), 128-133. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090526.
(6) Li M, Selvin PR. Amine-reactive forms of a luminescent
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid chelate of terbium and europium: attachment
to DNA and energy transfer measurements. Bioconjugate Chemistry 1997, 8 (2), 127-132.
DOI: 10.1021/bc960085m.
(7) Russell S, Casey R, Hoang DM, Little BW, Olmsted PD, Rumschitzki DS, Wadghiri YZ, Fisher EA. Quantification of the plasma
clearance kinetics of a gadolinium-based contrast agent by photoinduced triplet
harvesting. Analytical Chemistry 2012, 84 (19), 8106-8109. DOI: 10.1021/ac302136e.
(8) Laurent S, Vander Elst L, Henoumont C, Muller RN. How to
measure the transmetallation of a gadolinium complex. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2010, 5 (6), 305-308. DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.388.
(9) Clough TJ, Jiang L, Wong KL, Long NJ. Ligand design
strategies to increase stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging
contrast agents. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1), 1420. DOI:
10.1038/s41467-019-09342-3.
(10) Tweedle MF, Wedeking P, Kumar K. Biodistribution of Radiolabeled, Formulated
Gadopentetate, Gadoteridol, Gadoterate, and Gadodiamide in Mice and Rats.
Investigative Radiology 1995, 30 (6), 372-380. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199506000-00008