Matthew Mcgarry1, Damian Sowinski1, Diego Caban-Rivera2, Elijah Van Houten3, Curtis Johnson2, Keith Paulsen1, and Philip Bayly4
1Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States, 2University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States, 3University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 4Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Elastography, White Matter
Anisotropic MRE has shown some promise in estimating mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced biological tissues. However, these methods are restricted to modeling a single fiber and ignores complexity that occurs such as regions of brain white matter with crossing fibers. Here we implement an inversion algorithm capable of modeling material with two fiber directions obtained from diffusion MRI in order to reduce model data mismatch and provide fiber-specific properties, which may show promise in correlating with brain health and function. Performance of this algorithm is demonstrated in simulation and in vivo brain data and compared with one-fiber and zero-fiber (isotropic) inversions.
Introduction
MR elastography exploits the premise that microscale
cellular changes due to disease processes cause changes in the continuum
mechanical properties of tissue, and images of these properties can be inferred
from MR-measured displacements of vibrating tissue. Selecting a continuum
mechanical model is a necessary step to balance simplicity and complexity,
where simpler models have fewer unknown parameters requiring estimation at the
cost of potential modeling errors, and more complex models can reduce model
data mismatch by accurately representing the true mechanical behavior of tissue
but place greater demands on the data due to the wider spectrum of estimated
properties.
Many successful applications with a simple viscoelastic
model have been demonstrated, however, recent successes with a transverse
isotropic model1 of tissues reinforced by
aligned fiber tracts suggest we may not have reached the limit of achievable
complexity. The next step up in anisotropic model complexity is a crossing
fiber model which captures tissues with two separate fiber families passing
through at different angles. This model is relevant in brain where up to 40% of
white matter has crossing fibers, and muscle where fibers are arranged in
sheets. Methods
Both mechanical and diffusion anisotropy occur due to
preferentially aligned directions in the tissue microstructure, so it can be
assumed that the fiber maps from DTI also correspond to the preferred directions
of mechanical anisotropy. DTI can image the local directions of crossing
fibers, and these fiber maps form the basis of our two-fiber family (2FF)
mechanical model.
To derive a mechanical model, the elasticity tensor can be
constructed in the lab coordinate frame by associating a moduli with each
possible irreducible representation constructed from the scalar and tensor
degrees of freedom and any privileged directions (i.e. direction of fiber
families), together with the volumic-isochoric decomposition which provides a convenient
pathway to avoid numerical issues near-incompressible finite element models.
Using zero privileged directions gives two moduli and reproduces the commonly
used isotropic viscoelastic model. Adding one privileged direction yields an
additional two moduli and a form which is identical to the single fiber
transverse isotropic model which has been recently employed in MRE. Finally,
adding a second fiber family yields an additional 4 moduli and forms our two-fiber family (2FF) model. Importantly, this hierarchical approach (illustrated in figure 1) provides a simple pathway for a
future multi-model anisotropic MRE inversion where isotropic parameters are
recovered where no DTI fibers are found, single fiber transverse isotropic
parameters in regions of one fiber, and 2FF parameters in regions with crossing
fibers. In this work, we investigate recovering 2FF parameter across the whole
brain as a first step in the multi-model development process. Isotropic
inertial damping is implemented with a complex-valued density and real-valued
moduli to restrict the number of estimated parameters to 8.
Inversion protocol: Six real-valued 2FF moduli, μ1-μ6 , and an imaginary
density, ρI (2), were reconstructed
using a finite element-based nonlinear inversion algorithm from the AP and LR
displacement fields (μ7 was not reconstructed to avoid ambiguity in
computing fiber interaction moduli). Zero-fiber isotropic NLI and one-fiber
TI-NLI were also run on the same data for comparison. Constant density of
1000kgm-3 and nearly incompressible bulk modulus of 109Pa were specified. Substrate shear modulus, μ, Fiber
shear anisotropy, φA/B, tensile anisotropy, ζA/B, and interaction
moduli, ζAB, analogous to TI-NLI
was computed using the relationships in figure 1.
Simulated experiments: A realistic brain simulation generated form in vivo MRE3 with
properties defining three classes of tissue, 0 fibers for FAA and FAB <
0.15, one fiber for FAA>0.15 & FAB<0,15, and two fibers for FAA>0.15
and FAB>0,15. Zero, one and two-fiber nonlinear inversion (NLI) property recovery algorithms were run to investigate performance when
regions of different fiber counts are present.
In vivo imaging protocol: MRE and diffusion MRI data
was collected and reported in [Smith 2022]4. Multi-excitation MRE
acquisition at 2 mm isotropic resolution generated two displacement fields:
with anterior-posterior left-right vibrations, both at 50 Hz. Diffusion data at
1.5 mm resolution (128 directions, b = 1500 and 3000 s/mm2) was processed with
bedpostx in FSL to estimate up to two axonal fiber directions (Figure 3) in each voxel5,6. Here we show data on a 26 yo female subject.Results and Discussion
The new two-fiber model does show some promise, with reasonable performance in the simulated data
shown in figure 2, and in vivo images in figure 4 show structure and symmetry. The loss of resolution in the moving from the one-fiber to two-fiber models shown in figure 4 suggests we are getting
close to the limit of achievable complexity for MRE in these anisotropic models. A multi-model approach where the number of fibers varies based on DTI two-fiber fractional anisotropy maps may help by reducing unnecessary unknowns where they are not required. The
hierarchical structure of the model presented here will be valuable as elasticity matrix terms can be truncated when a fiber isn't present. Acknowledgements
NIH/NIBIB grant R01-EB027577.References
1. McGarry, M. et al. Mapping
heterogenous anisotropic tissue mechanical properties with transverse isotropic
nonlinear inversion MR elastography. Med. Image Anal. 78, (2022).
2. McGarry, M. D. J. & Van Houten, E.
E. W. Use of a Rayleigh damping model in elastography. Med. Biol. Eng.
Comput. 46, 759–766 (2008).
3. McGarry, M. D. J. et al. A
heterogenous, time harmonic, nearly incompressible transverse isotropic finite
element brain simulation platform for MR elastography. Phys. Med. Biol.
(2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab9a84.
4. Smith, D. R. et al. Anisotropic
mechanical properties in the healthy human brain estimated with
multi-excitation transversely isotropic MR elastography. Brain Multiphysics
3, 100051 (2022).
5. T.E.J. Behrens, H. Johansen-Berg, S. Jbabdi, M.F.S. Rushworth, and M.W. Woolrich. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations. What can we gain? NeuroImage, 23:144-155, 2007.
6. S. Jbabdi, S.N. Sotiropoulos, A. Savio, M. Grana, T.E.J. Behrens. Model-based analysis of multishell diffusion MR data for tractography: How to get over fitting problems. Magn Reson Med, 68(6):1846-1855, 2012.