Gastao Cruz1, Yuchi Liu1, Evan Cummings1, Jesse Hamilton1, Vikas Gulani1, and Nicole Seiberlich1
1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Heart, MR Fingerprinting
In this work, T1/T2/PDFF mapping with rosette cardiac MRF is improved by
exploiting the idea of virtual coils along with subspace constrained
reconstruction. The Hermitian symmetry of k-space is explicitly included in the
forward model via virtual coils and combined with global low-rank models. This
model is further combined with a regularizer leveraging prior information from
dictionaries, patch-similarity, and locally low-rank. This virtual-coil +
low-rank + patch-based approach is used to jointly reconstruct multi-echo rosette
MRF data for improved quality of the final T1, T2, and PDFF maps.
INTRODUCTION:
Global low-rank methods
have been widely used in MR, for a variety of applications. In the context of
MR Fingerprinting (MRF)1, global subspace constrained
reconstructions2,3,4 help suppress residual aliasing commonly
present in property maps derived from highly undersampled acquisitions. Partial
Fourier5 reconstruction is another longstanding method that exploits
the Hermitian symmetry of a (real) object for undersampled acquisitions, which
has been studied under various formulations like PFPP,6 LORAKS,7 and Virtual Coil Concept.8 The first contribution in this work is combining virtual coils with
global low-rank methods to leverage both types of a priori information.
Regularization
methods are also effective at suppressing aliasing and noise. Compressed
Sensing,9 locally low-rank regularizers10 and dictionary
based regularization,4,11 among others, have been proposed for MRF
applications. Redundant information between similar image patches has been
widely used in other fields (e.g. Non-Local-Means12,
Block-Matching-3D13), and have also been investigated for MR in
methods like LOST14 and (HD)-PROST15. The second contribution in this work
is developing an MRF-tailored regularizer, incorporating ideas from,4,10,15 and combining it with the aforementioned virtual-coil + low-rank model. The
proposed approach was evaluated for T1/T2/PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction)
cardiac MRF in five healthy subjects.METHODS:
A common way of incorporating low-rank constraints into the forward
model is via the so-called Low-rank Inversion (LRI) expressed by the following
problem:
$$\boldsymbol{\hat{y}=argmin_y}\begin{Vmatrix}\boldsymbol{SU_{TR}Fy-s}\end{Vmatrix}_2^2,[eq.1]$$
where $$$\boldsymbol{S}$$$ is
the sampling trajectory, $$$\boldsymbol{F}$$$ is the Fourier transform, $$$\boldsymbol{C}$$$ are coil
sensitivities, $$$\boldsymbol{U_{TR}}$$$ is the low-rank subspace, $$$\boldsymbol{y}$$$ are the so-called singular images and $$$\boldsymbol{s}$$$
are the acquired data. In (single-echo) MRF, $$$\boldsymbol{U_{TR}}$$$
is commonly derived from the dictionary itself,
used to compress the data along the TR dimension, and can be applied in k-space
for computational advantages.
Virtual coils are a
convenient way of leveraging Hermitian symmetry into the forward model, and may
be exploited within a low-rank model via:
$$\boldsymbol{\hat{y}=argmin_y}\begin{Vmatrix}\boldsymbol{SU_{TR}F\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{P}\\\boldsymbol{P*}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{C}\\\boldsymbol{C*}\end{bmatrix}y-\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{s}\\\boldsymbol{s'}\end{bmatrix}}\end{Vmatrix}_2^2,[eq.2]$$
where
$$$\boldsymbol{P}$$$
is the image phase, and $$$\boldsymbol{s'(k)=s^*(-k)}$$$ (where $$$\boldsymbol{k}$$$ denotes k-space coordinate). For multi-echo data, we can further consider
a low-rank compression $$$\boldsymbol{U_{TE}}$$$ along the echo-time dimension. Since eq. [2] reconstructs
real-valued images, this basis could potentially be lower rank than for complex
valued images; the corresponding model (also considering regularization) would
be:
$$\boldsymbol{\hat{y}=argmin_y}\begin{Vmatrix}\boldsymbol{SU_{TR}F\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{P}\\\boldsymbol{P*}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{C}\\\boldsymbol{C*}\end{bmatrix}U_{TE}y-\begin{bmatrix}\boldsymbol{s}\\\boldsymbol{s'}\end{bmatrix}}\end{Vmatrix}_2^2+R(\boldsymbol{y}),[eq.3]$$
where $$$R$$$ is some regularizer. In practice, $$$\boldsymbol{U_{TE}}$$$
can be derived via a preliminary reconstruction
from eq. [2]. The forward model in eq. [3], virtual-coil + low-rank (Fig.1-top),
exploits Partial Fourier and redundant information along the TR and TE
dimensions.
Additionally, we propose
a novel regularizer, combining ideas from locally low-rank, geometric augmentation, patch-based and dictionary-based
approaches, defined as:
$$R(\boldsymbol{y})= \sum_b \lambda_b\begin{Vmatrix}\boldsymbol{Q_bADD^Hy}\end{Vmatrix}_*,[eq.4]$$
where $$$\boldsymbol{D}$$$
is the
MRF dictionary, $$$\boldsymbol{A}$$$
creates
replicas of
mirrored and rotated about the center, and $$$\boldsymbol{Q_b}$$$ finds
a set of self-similar patches relative to pixel b and arranges them into
a Casorati matrix. $$$\boldsymbol{DD^H}$$$ projects each fingerprint into its’
(compressed) dictionary entry of length Nr, producing a similar denoising effect to standard
template matching used in MRF for parameter estimation. $$$\boldsymbol{A}$$$
creates
eight copies of
via
basic (interpolation-less) mirror/rotation operations. This is relevant for the
following step, as it creates additional redundant patches for self-similarity.
Finally (and for each pixel b),
$$$\boldsymbol{Q_b}$$$ finds a set of
similar
image blocks (of size NpxNp) via inner product, and arranges them into a Np2NrxNb (low-rank)
matrix, which can be efficiently denoised via SVD. This patch-based regularizer
(Fig.1-bottom) is combined with the virtual-coil + low-rank forward model, and
applied to T1/T2/PDFF mapping in cardiac MRF.
EXPERIMENTS:
The proposed approach was evaluated in five
healthy subjects (age = 31.0±13.1 years, 4 females) at 1.5T (Magnetom Sola, Siemens
Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using an 18-channel cardiac coil. Imaging parameters
included one short axis slice;
field of view (FOV) = 300 mm2; 8 mm slice thickness; resolution = 1.56×1.56
mm2; TE/ΔTE/TR = 1.39/0.94/9.7 ms; flip angle = 4-25º; FISP readout;
rosette trajectory; 15-heartbeat breath-hold. Data were reconstructed with LRI
(eq. [1]) and with the proposed virtual-coil + low-rank +
patch-based recon (eqs. [3,4]). Parametric values were measured in ROIs in the
interventricular septum.RESULTS:
Residual aliasing and noise amplification are present in parametric maps
reconstructed with LRI; however these artefacts are considerably reduced with
the proposed approach (Fig.3, Fig.4). Additionally, a better
delineation of structures, particularly around water/fat interfaces, was
observed with the proposed approach. Mean T1 for the cohort was (in format [LRI;
proposed]): [1127±23; 1150±25] ms, T2 was [42.0±1.5; 43.0±2.2] ms, PDFF was
[2.8±3.8; 1.5±1.6] %. Corresponding standard deviations were [89±32; 48±16] ms,
[6.8±2.6; 4.9±1.7] ms, [7.5±2.0; 4.2±1.8] %. T1/T2/PDFF values were in general
agreement between LRI and virtual-coil + low-rank + patch-based, however a
higher apparent precision (lower standard deviation) was observed for the
latter (Fig.5). Slightly higher T1/T2 values were observed with the proposed method and are presumably due to the improved water/fat separation (and improved PDFF mapping with the proposed approach), which reduces bias from
fat signal leaking into the water signal. CONCLUSION:
A
novel forward model for multi-echo MRF is developed, combining virtual coils
with global low-rank; furthermore a novel MRF denoiser is developed, combining
ideas from dictionary-regularization, geometric image augmentation,
patch-similarity and locally low-rank. The proposed approach outperformed
conventional global low-rank and will be investigated further in comparison to
gold standard methods.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NIH (R01 HL153034,
R01HL163991) and Siemens healthcare.References
1. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL,
Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013
Mar;495(7440):187-92.McGivney DF, Pierre E, Ma D,
et al. SVD compression for magnetic resonance fingerprinting in the time
domain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2014;33:2311–2322 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2337321.
2. McGivney DF, Pierre E, Ma D, et al. SVD compression for
magnetic resonance fingerprinting in the time domain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
2014;33:2311–2322 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2337321.
3. Zhao B, Setsompop K, Adalsteinsson E, et al. Improved
magnetic resonance fingerprinting reconstruction with low-rank and subspace
modeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79:933–942 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26701.
4. Assländer J, Cloos MA, Knoll F, Sodickson DK, Hennig J,
Lattanzi R. Low-rank alternating direction method of multipliers reconstruction
for MR fingerprinting. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79:83–96 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26639
5. Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in
magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 1991
Jun;10(2):154-63.
6. Bydder M, Robson MD. Partial Fourier partially parallel
imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2005
Jun;53(6):1393-401.
7. Haldar JP. Low-rank modeling of local k-space neighborhoods
(LORAKS) for constrained MRI. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2013 Dec
5;33(3):668-81.
8. Blaimer M, Gutberlet M, Kellman P, Breuer FA, Köstler H,
Griswold MA. Virtual coil concept for improved parallel MRI employing conjugate
symmetric signals. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009
Jan;61(1):93-102.
9. Davies M, Puy G, Vandergheynst P, Wiaux Y. A compressed
sensing framework for magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Siam journal on
imaging sciences. 2014;7(4):2623-56.
10. Lima da Cruz G, Bustin A, Jaubert O, Schneider T, Botnar RM,
Prieto C. Sparsity and locally low-rank regularization for MR fingerprinting.
Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2019 Jun;81(6):3530-43.
11. Cline CC, Chen X, Mailhe B, Wang Q, Pfeuffer J, Nittka M,
Griswold MA, Speier P, Nadar MS. AIR-MRF: accelerated iterative reconstruction
for magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2017 Sep
1;41:29-40.
12. Coupé P, Yger P, Prima S, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C.
An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic
resonance images. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2008 Mar
31;27(4):425-41.
13. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K. Image denoising
with block-matching and 3D filtering. InImage processing: algorithms and
systems, neural networks, and machine learning 2006 Feb 17 (Vol. 6064, pp.
354-365). SPIE.
14. Akçakaya M, Basha TA, Goddu B, Goepfert LA, Kissinger KV,
Tarokh V, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Low‐dimensional‐structure self‐learning and
thresholding: regularization beyond compressed sensing for MRI reconstruction.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011 Sep;66(3):756-67.
15. Bustin A, Lima da Cruz G, Jaubert O, Lopez K, Botnar RM,
Prieto C. High‐dimensionality undersampled patch‐based reconstruction
(HD‐PROST) for accelerated multi‐contrast MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine.
2019 Jun;81(6):3705-19.