Dantian Zhu1, Yijie Fang1, Wenhao Wu1, Shaolin Li1, Long Qian2, and Yajun Ma3
1Department of Radiology,Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China, 2MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China, 3University of California, San Diego, Department of Radiology, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Cartilage, Cartilage
To assess the detection of changes in the knee cartilage of amateur marathon runners before and after long-distance running. We recruited 23 amateur marathon runners prospectively. MRI scans using UTE-MT and UTE-T2* sequences. UTE-MTR and UTE-T2* were measured for knee cartilage. The UTE-MTR values in lateral tibial plateau, central medial femoral condyle, and medial tibial plateau showed a significant decrease at 2 days post-race compared to the other two time points (P < 0.05). But no significant UTE-T2* changes were found for any cartilage subregions. UTE-MTR is a promising method for the detection of dynamic changes in knee cartilage.
INTRODUCTION
Long-distance
running is related to injury of the knee cartilage, which can eventually
develop into osteoarthritis. Non-invasive MR monitoring of early changes in the
cartilage allows for timely intervention of osteoarthritis progression and can
prolong the life of exercise. This study aims to assess the detection of changes in the knee
cartilage of amateur marathon runners before and after long-distance running
using a 3D ultrashort echo time MRI sequence with magnetization transfer
preparation (UTE-MT).METHODS
We recruited 23 amateur
marathon runners (46 knees) in this prospective cohort study. MRI scans using ultrashort echo time
magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) and UTE-T2* sequences were performed 3 times
(pre-race, 2 days post-race, and 4 weeks post-race). UTE-MT ratio (UTE-MTR) and
UTE-T2* were measured for knee cartilage (eight subregions) before and after
running. The sequence reproducibility and inter-rater reliability were also
investigated.RESULTS
Both the UTE-MTR and UTE-T2* measurements showed good reproducibility
and inter-rater reliability. For most subregions of cartilage, the UTE-MTR values decreased 2 days
post-race and increased after 4 weeks of rest. Conversely, the UTE-T2* values
increased 2 days post-race and decreased after 4 weeks. The UTE-MTR values in lateral
tibial plateau, central medial femoral condyle, and medial tibial plateau
showed a significant decrease at 2 days post-race compared to the other two
time points (P < 0.05). By comparison, no significant UTE-T2* changes
were found for any cartilage subregions. DISCUSSION
The
UTE-MT technique characterizes the tissue system with a two-pool model which
includes the water and macromolecular proton pools1, 2. The magnetizations
in these two pools are constantly being exchanged. Even though the UTE sequence
is unable to detect the signal from macromolecular protons3, the UTE-MT
technique provides indirect information about collagen content and integrity by
utilizing the exchange effect. Li et al. using UTE-MT suggests that the MRI
analysis (bound proton fraction and k) showed a statistically significant
increase in correlated with the increase of glycosaminoglycan4. A recent
study has found a strong correlation between UTE-MTR values and histological
degeneration grades (i.e., Mankin scores, r = - 0.678, P < 0.001) for human
knee cartilage samples5. This demonstrates that UTE-MT technique is also
promising for the evaluation of tissue changes in knee osteoarthritis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first UTE-MT study that
evaluates changes in the knee cartilage after long-distance running.CONCLUSION
UTE-MTR is a promising method for the detection of dynamic changes in
knee cartilage after long-distance running.Acknowledgements
This article is supported by the National Natural
Science Found (No. 82101995); the National Natural Science Found(82172053).References
[1] Zhang,
X., Y.J. Ma, Z. Wei, et al (2021) Macromolecular fraction (MMF) from 3D
ultrashort echo time cones magnetization transfer (3D UTE-Cones-MT) imaging
predicts meniscal degeneration and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage 29(8):1173-1180.
[2] Ma,
Y.J., E.Y. Chang, M. CarlJ. Du (2018) Quantitative magnetization transfer
ultrashort echo time imaging using a time-efficient 3D multispoke Cones
sequence. Magn Reson Med 79(2):692-700.
[3] Ma,
Y.J., E.Y. Chang, G.M. BydderJ. Du (2016) Can ultrashort-TE (UTE) MRI sequences
on a 3-T clinical scanner detect signal directly from collagen protons:
freeze-dry and D2 O exchange studies of cortical bone and Achilles tendon
specimens. NMR Biomed 29(7):912-7.
[4] Li,
W., L. Hong, L. HuR.L. Magin (2010) Magnetization transfer imaging provides a
quantitative measure of chondrogenic differentiation and tissue development.
Tissue Eng Part C Methods 16(6):1407-15.
[5] Yang,
J., H. Shao, Y. Ma, et al (2020) Quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetization
transfer (UTE-MT) for diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration: comparison
with UTE-T2* and T2 mapping. Quant Imaging Med Surg 10(1):171-183.