Ruicheng Ba1, Yuhui Ma2, Kuiyuan Liu1, Tianshu Zheng1, Haotian Li1, Chen Li2, Xiaoli Wang2, and Dan Wu1
1Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hanzhou, China, 2Department of Medical Imaging, Weifang Medical University, Shandong, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques, Brain
Transcytolemal water
exchange can be estimated using diffusion-time-dependent diffusion kurtosis
imaging acquired at long diffusion times. However, dMRI signals
acquired at long diffusion times using STEAM sequences are typically noisy, and fitting of the nonlinear kurtosis model and the Kärger model accumulates
fitting errors. Here, we proposed a Bayesian method for estimating
transcytolemal exchange time from the Kärger model and compared accuracy
and robustness with conventional least square fitting method in both
simulated data and rat brain data in a model of transient middle cerebral
artery occlusion. Results indicated improved fitting accuracy and robustness
against noise using the Bayesian approach.
Introduction
Recently, diffusion-time (td) dependent diffusion kurtosis
imaging (tDKI) [1; 2] using stimulated echo acquisition
mode (STEAM)-DWI pulse sequences [3; 4] has been proposed
to probe transcytolemmal
water exchange, e.g., using the Kärger model (KM) [5-7]. Some simulation and
preclinical studies [1; 2; 8; 9] have demonstrated its potential
in quantifying exchange time in grey matter and cancers. However, since data
acquired with STEAM sequences have low SNRs (signal is half of the pulse
gradient spin-echo sequence), fitting of the nonlinear kurtosis model and the KM
accumulates fitting errors. The accuracy and robustness of tDKI data
fitting with high noise have not been investigated. This study proposed using the Bayesian
probability theory for the analysis of tDKI data and compared its performance
with the nonlinear least squares (NLLS) method in both simulated data and rat brain
data in a model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).Methods
Simulation data: Simulation
data were generated using Matlab with instantons kurtosis at infinitely short td (K0)=1.5, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.4, and transcytolemmal exchange time (tex)=10, 20, 50, and 80ms. Gaussian
noise was added to the signal to achieve SNR=10 and 20.
Data acquisition: Two
rats underwent the MCAO model by occlusion of the middle cerebral artery to
induce transient ischemia, followed by reperfusion after 2 hours[10]. MRI scans were
performed before occlusion and at 2h, 6h, 12h, 24h, and 72h after reperfusion on a 7.0T Bruker scanner using a rat brain
array surface coil. The diffusion-weighted STEAM sequence was performed at six td (20, 50, 80, 100, 150, and
200ms) with one b0, three b-shells (b = 800, 1500, 2500 s/mm2), and 18
diffusion directions. Coronal slices with 1mm-thickness were acquired with TE =
18ms, TR = 2000ms, FOV = 24×19.2mm2, matrix size = 80×64, yielding in-plane
resolution = 0.3×0.3 mm2.
Data analysis: dMRI
data were fitted using the DKE toolbox [11] to obtain diffusivity
and kurtosis maps at individual td,
which were fed into the KM for estimating K0
and tex while fixing K∞=0:
$$S(t,b)=S_0 (t) exp(-bD+1/6 b^2 D^2 K(t))$$
$$K(t)=K_0 (2t_ex)/t[1-t_ex/t(1-e^(-t/t_ex ))]+K_∞$$
NLLS curve fitting was performed in MATLAB,
which was repeated 100 times with randomized initialization. A house-made
Bayesian fitting pipeline was developed according to Gustafsson et al [12] with lognormal and
reciprocal priors, and we took the mean, median, and mode as a central tendency
measure of the K0 and tex estimation. The two
methods were compared based on the accuracy as evaluated by mean square error
(MSE) and robustness as evaluated by the standard deviation (STD).Results
Simulation experiment
Figure 1a
showed correlation of estimated K0
with groundtruth based on NLLS analysis and Bayesian methods. All Bayesian outputs
dramatically decreased the STD than NLLS at all SNR levels (Figure 1a), and the
Bayesian results using lognormal prior and the mode as a central tendency
measure had the lowest average RMSE, as shown in Table 1. As for tex estimation, the Bayesian
results using lognormal prior and the median as a central tendency measure resulted
in the lowest average RMSE compared to NLLS as shown in Table 1, while the two methods gave similar STD at all SNR levels (Figure 1b).
Animal experiments
Figure 2
shows the estimated K0 and
tex maps in a normal rat
brain NLLS and Bayesian methods. Some voxels (red arrows) reached the fitting
boundary and there were more outliers in the NLLS fitting compared with the Bayesian
fitting. The
measured tex = 24.0±16.3
ms in the
normal cortex is consistent with previous reports for the in vivo rat brain [8]. Figure 3 shows a representative rat scanned
longitudinally at 2-72h after reperfusion, which revealed the increase of cell
membrane permeability following MCAO, as evaluated by permeability p (the reciprocal of tex). p increased instantly in the ipsilateral striatum at 2hrs after
injury, and the ipsilateral cortex showed elevated p around 24 hours after injury. Figure 4
quantified the time course of p during
the progression of injury, which increased continuously in the ipsilateral cortex
between 2- 72h, while in the ipsilateral striatum, p first increased between 2- 24h, and fell
back at 72h.Discussion and Conclusion
This study demonstrated
that compared with the least squares method, the Bayesian fitting achieved higher
robustness while ensuring accuracy. Moreover, using the median for tex estimation while the mode
for K0 estimation as a
central tendency measure provided better performance for the lognormal prior. We
also demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the transcytolemmal water
exchange rate with tDKI in a rat model of ischemic injury. The longitudinal
change of transcytolemmal permeability revealed a distinct pattern of injury
progression after ischemia insult. Statistical analysis with a larger sample
size and comparison with histology for the transcytolemmal permeability will be
performed in future experiments.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFE0114600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801424, 81971606, 82122032, 2021ZD0200202), and the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (202006140, 2022C03057).References
1. Zhang
J, Lemberskiy G, Moy L, Fieremans E, Novikov DS, Kim SG (2021) Measurement of
cellular-interstitial water exchange time in tumors based on
diffusion-time-dependent diffusional kurtosis imaging. NMR in Biomedicine 34:e4496
2. Fieremans E, Novikov DS, Jensen JH,
Helpern JA (2010) Monte Carlo study of a two-compartment exchange model of
diffusion. NMR in Biomedicine 23:711-724
3. Kleinnijenhuis M, Mollink J, Lam W et
al (2017) Choice of reference measurements affects quantification of long
diffusion time behaviour using stimulated echoes. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 79
4. Merboldt KD, Hänicke W, Frahm J (1991)
Diffusion Imaging Using Stimulated Echoes. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
19:233-239
5. KÄRger J, Pfeifer H, Heink W (1988)
Principles and Application of Self-Diffusion Measurements by Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance. In: Waugh JS, (ed) Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance.
Academic Press, pp 1-89
6. Kärger J (1985) NMR self-diffusion
studies in heterogeneous systems. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
23:129-148
7. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H,
Kaczynski K (2005) Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of
non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 53:1432-1440
8. Jelescu IO, de Skowronski A, Geffroy
F, Palombo M, Novikov DS (2022) Neurite Exchange Imaging (NEXI): A minimal
model of diffusion in gray matter with inter-compartment water exchange.
NEUROIMAGE 256:119277
9. Solomon E, Lemberskiy G, Baete S et al
(2022) Time-dependent diffusivity and kurtosis in phantoms and patients with
head and neck cancer. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine n/a
10. Chiang T, Messing RO, Chou WH (2011)
Mouse model of middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Vis Exp. 10.3791/2761
11. Tabesh A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA,
Helpern JA (2011) Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in
diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 65:823-836
12. Gustafsson O, Montelius M, Starck G,
Ljungberg M (2018) Impact of prior distributions and central tendency measures
on Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion model fitting. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 79:1674-1683