Sarah J Garrow1, John Peters1, Abby Grillo1, Rasim Boyacioglu2, Kathryn E Keenan3, Mark A Griswold2, and William A Grissom1
1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Thermometry, MR-Guided Interventions
PRF-shift
thermometry is the current standard for MR-based temperature monitoring in
interventional procedures and works by converting gradient-recalled image phase
changes to temperature changes. However, the long TE required for phase
contrast increases sensitivity to artifacts from motion. We propose to address
this using quadratic phase MR fingerprinting (qRF-MRF) which is robust to spurious
artifacts. We implemented a qRF-MRF sequence
that sweeps continuously across resonance frequencies and is highly sensitive
to heating-induced resonance frequency changes. The sequence was used to
monitor laser heating in a phantom, with comparison to GRE thermometry.
Introduction
Proton
resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry is the current standard for MR-based
temperature monitoring in interventional procedures. PRFS thermometry typically
measures phase changes in gradient-recalled echo images and converts them to
temperature change using the equation $$$\Delta T = \frac{\phi T - \phi T0}{\gamma \alpha B0}$$$, where α is 0.01 ppm/°C, the PRF change coefficient for
water 1.
However, due to the relatively long TE required to develop heating phase
contrast it is sensitive to the motion of water in transcranial focused
ultrasound2.
Given that quadratic phase MR fingerprinting (qRF-MRF) can quantify off-resonance using
much shorter TEs than GRE scans3,
it could be used to convert the mapped off-resonance to temperature1, 4 to make temperature maps with less sensitivity to motion while
simultaneously creating T2 maps. Here we propose a constant-flip-angle,
short-TE qRF-MRF sequence for MR thermometry and compare it to GRE-EPI thermometry
in phantom laser ablations. Methods
Pulse
Sequence
A qRF-MRF sequence was implemented on a Philips Elition X 3 Tesla scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) using a 32-channel receive coil array. The sequence’s flip angles and excitation RF phases are plotted in Figures 1a and 1b. It had balanced gradient areas and used a six-shot spiral readout with constant TR = 15.5 ms, TE = 2.2 ms, 10° flip angle, a spiral acquisition window of ~10 ms and acquired voxel size of 1.72 mm x 1.72 mm x 4 mm. A quadratic excitation pulse RF phase of 4.2n2 degrees for n = 250 TRs sensitized the sequence to off-resonance. Figure 2 illustrates this: The quadratic phase corresponds to a repeating frequency sweep, and as the sequence sweeps past each resonance frequency, signals at that frequency are refocused and increase in amplitude for several TRs, before decaying again as the sequence’s frequency shifts away. Signals at different frequencies refocus at different time points, enabling an MRF dictionary match for off-resonance based on the signals’ amplitude and phase. A comparable conventional GRE-EPI (5 echoes per TR) sequence was also implemented, which used a 12 ms TE, 5 slices, 130 ms TR, 20° flip angle (the Ernst angle for this T1 = 2000 ms phantom), and acquired voxel size of 0.43 mm x 0.54 mm x 5 mm. Both the qRF-MRF and GRE-EPI sequences imaged a 110x110 mm2 FOV.
MRF
Dictionary Construction
The
qRF-MRF spiral data were gridded and coil-combined, and each voxel’s data were
matched against entries of a Bloch-simulated dictionary. The dictionary was
constructed for a single T1 value (2000 ms), a range of 21 T2
values from (10 to 200 ms), 4 initial Mz values (0.4, 0.5 0.6 1), and
1024 temperature values (-10 to 40 °C) across 250 excitations/timepoints.
Laser
Heating Experiment
A
phantom comprising 1% agar by volume of water was heated using a Class 3b BWTek
BWF5-980-15 laser ablation system (Plainsboro, NJ) at 3W of continuous wave mode
using a 400-micron optical fiber. Images were acquired as transverse slices
perpendicular to the fiber. The dynamic scan time was 5.3 ms per image for
GRE-EPI, and 3.9 ms per image for qRF-MRF. A 1 second relaxation delay was
inserted between each 250-TR qRF-MRF block.
Intermittent
Interfering Signal Simulation
To
demonstrate qRF-MRF's robustness to intermittent interference from, e.g., the flow
of water in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound, a simulation was
performed in which signal from an unheated blinking circle was added to
simulated qRF-MRF and 2DFT signals generated by a circular object with a centered
Gaussian hot spot. The blinking circle’s amplitude was randomly varied through
the scans up to 4x the main circle’s amplitude. qRF-MRF and 2DFT temperature maps
were reconstructed for comparison. Results and Discussion
Figure
3a shows GRE-EPI and qRF-MRF temperature maps after the laser was switched off, as
well as the matched and measured signal time courses for a heated voxel. The
GRE-EPI temperature precision was ~3x worse than qRF-MRF's precision. Figure 4 shows
how qRF-MRF can further produce a map of the change in T2 caused
by heating (4b), which corresponds to decreased signal amplitude in the GRE-EPI
images (4a). Figure 4c shows that it may be possible to reduce the qRF-MRF block
length by 2x or more without significant loss of temperature precision and
accuracy. Figure 5a shows the centered circle object containing the hot spot,
and Figures 5b shows the reconstructed 2DFT and qRF-MRF temperature maps. The qRF-MRF temperature error was > 3x lower than the 2DFT error (0.155 versus 0.487 °C
RMS errors). Conclusion
Results
showed that qRF-MRF temperature mapping can provide precise temperature imaging
while simultaneously generating maps of T2 changes.
The method’s short TE and repeated sampling of the center of k-space every TR
retains signal as T2 shortens with heating, unlike
conventional PRFS scans which use long TEs for high temperature phase contrast and
suffer loss of temperature precision with heating. The scan could be used with
dynamic scan times as short as 2 seconds, and in a sliding window fashion, and
is robust to intermittent interfering signals. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grants R01 NS120518 and R01 EB028773.References
[1] V. Rieke and K. Butts Pauly, “MR
thermometry,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 376–390, Feb.
2008, doi: 10.1002/jmri.21265.
[2] Luo
H, Sigona MK, Manuel TJ, et al. Reduced-field of view three-dimensional MR
acoustic radiation force imaging with a low-rank reconstruction for targeting
transcranial focused ultrasound. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:2419-2431. doi:
10.1002/mrm.29403
[3] C.
Y. Wang, S. Coppo, B. B. Mehta, N. Seiberlich, X. Yu, and M. A. Griswold,
“Magnetic resonance fingerprinting with quadratic RF phase for measurement of
T2* simultaneously with δf, T1, and T2,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1849–1862, 2019, doi: 10.1002/mrm.27543.
[4] R.
Boyacioglu, M. Poorman, K. Keenan, and M. Griswold, “Magnetic Resonance
Fingerprinting with Quadratic RF Phase for Continuous Temperature Monitoring in
Aqueous Tissues,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020).