4990

MR Thermometry by Quadratic Phase MR Fingerprinting
Sarah J Garrow1, John Peters1, Abby Grillo1, Rasim Boyacioglu2, Kathryn E Keenan3, Mark A Griswold2, and William A Grissom1
1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, United States

Synopsis

Keywords: Thermometry, MR-Guided Interventions

PRF-shift thermometry is the current standard for MR-based temperature monitoring in interventional procedures and works by converting gradient-recalled image phase changes to temperature changes. However, the long TE required for phase contrast increases sensitivity to artifacts from motion. We propose to address this using quadratic phase MR fingerprinting (qRF-MRF) which is robust to spurious artifacts. We implemented a qRF-MRF sequence that sweeps continuously across resonance frequencies and is highly sensitive to heating-induced resonance frequency changes. The sequence was used to monitor laser heating in a phantom, with comparison to GRE thermometry.

Introduction

Proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry is the current standard for MR-based temperature monitoring in interventional procedures. PRFS thermometry typically measures phase changes in gradient-recalled echo images and converts them to temperature change using the equation $$$\Delta T = \frac{\phi T - \phi T0}{\gamma \alpha B0}$$$, where α is 0.01 ppm/°C, the PRF change coefficient for water 1. However, due to the relatively long TE required to develop heating phase contrast it is sensitive to the motion of water in transcranial focused ultrasound2. Given that quadratic phase MR fingerprinting (qRF-MRF) can quantify off-resonance using much shorter TEs than GRE scans3, it could be used to convert the mapped off-resonance to temperature1, 4 to make temperature maps with less sensitivity to motion while simultaneously creating T2 maps. Here we propose a constant-flip-angle, short-TE qRF-MRF sequence for MR thermometry and compare it to GRE-EPI thermometry in phantom laser ablations.

Methods

Pulse Sequence

A qRF-MRF sequence was implemented on a Philips Elition X 3 Tesla scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) using a 32-channel receive coil array. The sequence’s flip angles and excitation RF phases are plotted in Figures 1a and 1b. It had balanced gradient areas and used a six-shot spiral readout with constant TR = 15.5 ms, TE = 2.2 ms, 10° flip angle, a spiral acquisition window of ~10 ms and acquired voxel size of 1.72 mm x 1.72 mm x 4 mm. A quadratic excitation pulse RF phase of 4.2n2 degrees for n = 250 TRs sensitized the sequence to off-resonance. Figure 2 illustrates this: The quadratic phase corresponds to a repeating frequency sweep, and as the sequence sweeps past each resonance frequency, signals at that frequency are refocused and increase in amplitude for several TRs, before decaying again as the sequence’s frequency shifts away. Signals at different frequencies refocus at different time points, enabling an MRF dictionary match for off-resonance based on the signals’ amplitude and phase. A comparable conventional GRE-EPI (5 echoes per TR) sequence was also implemented, which used a 12 ms TE, 5 slices, 130 ms TR, 20° flip angle (the Ernst angle for this T1 = 2000 ms phantom), and acquired voxel size of 0.43 mm x 0.54 mm x 5 mm. Both the qRF-MRF and GRE-EPI sequences imaged a 110x110 mm2 FOV.

MRF Dictionary Construction

The qRF-MRF spiral data were gridded and coil-combined, and each voxel’s data were matched against entries of a Bloch-simulated dictionary. The dictionary was constructed for a single T1 value (2000 ms), a range of 21 T2 values from (10 to 200 ms), 4 initial Mz values (0.4, 0.5 0.6 1), and 1024 temperature values (-10 to 40 °C) across 250 excitations/timepoints.

Laser Heating Experiment

A phantom comprising 1% agar by volume of water was heated using a Class 3b BWTek BWF5-980-15 laser ablation system (Plainsboro, NJ) at 3W of continuous wave mode using a 400-micron optical fiber. Images were acquired as transverse slices perpendicular to the fiber. The dynamic scan time was 5.3 ms per image for GRE-EPI, and 3.9 ms per image for qRF-MRF. A 1 second relaxation delay was inserted between each 250-TR qRF-MRF block.

Intermittent Interfering Signal Simulation

To demonstrate qRF-MRF's robustness to intermittent interference from, e.g., the flow of water in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound, a simulation was performed in which signal from an unheated blinking circle was added to simulated qRF-MRF and 2DFT signals generated by a circular object with a centered Gaussian hot spot. The blinking circle’s amplitude was randomly varied through the scans up to 4x the main circle’s amplitude. qRF-MRF and 2DFT temperature maps were reconstructed for comparison.

Results and Discussion

Figure 3a shows GRE-EPI and qRF-MRF temperature maps after the laser was switched off, as well as the matched and measured signal time courses for a heated voxel. The GRE-EPI temperature precision was ~3x worse than qRF-MRF's precision. Figure 4 shows how qRF-MRF can further produce a map of the change in T2 caused by heating (4b), which corresponds to decreased signal amplitude in the GRE-EPI images (4a). Figure 4c shows that it may be possible to reduce the qRF-MRF block length by 2x or more without significant loss of temperature precision and accuracy. Figure 5a shows the centered circle object containing the hot spot, and Figures 5b shows the reconstructed 2DFT and qRF-MRF temperature maps. The qRF-MRF temperature error was > 3x lower than the 2DFT error (0.155 versus 0.487 °C RMS errors).

Conclusion

Results showed that qRF-MRF temperature mapping can provide precise temperature imaging while simultaneously generating maps of T2 changes. The method’s short TE and repeated sampling of the center of k-space every TR retains signal as T2 shortens with heating, unlike conventional PRFS scans which use long TEs for high temperature phase contrast and suffer loss of temperature precision with heating. The scan could be used with dynamic scan times as short as 2 seconds, and in a sliding window fashion, and is robust to intermittent interfering signals.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants R01 NS120518 and R01 EB028773.

References

[1] V. Rieke and K. Butts Pauly, “MR thermometry,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 376–390, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1002/jmri.21265.

[2] Luo H, Sigona MK, Manuel TJ, et al. Reduced-field of view three-dimensional MR acoustic radiation force imaging with a low-rank reconstruction for targeting transcranial focused ultrasound. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:2419-2431. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29403

[3] C. Y. Wang, S. Coppo, B. B. Mehta, N. Seiberlich, X. Yu, and M. A. Griswold, “Magnetic resonance fingerprinting with quadratic RF phase for measurement of T2* simultaneously with δf, T1, and T2,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1849–1862, 2019, doi: 10.1002/mrm.27543.

[4] R. Boyacioglu, M. Poorman, K. Keenan, and M. Griswold, “Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting with Quadratic RF Phase for Continuous Temperature Monitoring in Aqueous Tissues,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020).

Figures

Figure 1. The qRF-MRF pulse sequence a) A constant flip angle of 10° was used throughout, which was chosen from Monte Carlo simulations. b) The RF phase at each TR index is incremented by 4.2n2 degrees, which was also chosen from Monte Carlo simulations. c) The signal amplitude time course of the 0 Hz entry from the Bloch-simulated dictionary shows how the signal increases whenever the sequence’s instantaneous frequency sweeps past 0 Hz.

Figure 2. As the temperature in the simulated hot spot increases its frequency shifts and the signal time course of the center voxel changes, experiencing a frequency shift and a shift of the peaks. The background signal of a nonheated voxel does not change over time, and remains distinct from the heated voxel's time course.

Figure 3. a) GRE-EPI PRFS and qRF-MRF temperature maps immediately after switching off the laser. The background temperature precision is ~3x better in the qRF-MRF map. b) The signal time course of the center qRF-MRF voxel for this time point for both the data and the corresponding dictionary match., which in this example is for a 12 °C increase in temperature.

Figure 4. a) Magnitude images of the GRE-EPI images before heating and near the peak of heating. An area of decreased signal magnitude can be seen at the hotspot due primarily to shortened T2. b) As the phantom is heated, a decrease in T2 is also observed near the hot spot in the qRF-MRF T2 map. c) Temperature reconstructions using qRF-MRF with progressively fewer timepoints. The leftmost image is a reconstruction using the full 250-TR sequence, followed by reduced datasets with shorter scan times.

Figure 5. a) Magnitude of the simulated central object containing a hotspot, as well as a randomly blinking object outside. A centered Gaussian hotspot was applied to this image with a peak temperature of 15 °C. b) Simulated reconstructed 2DFT (left) and qRF-MRF (right). The blinking object distorted the hot spot while the qRF-MRF scan was robust to its presence, with 3x-lower RMS error.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
4990
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/4990