Nitin Jain1, Ashok Kumar P Reddy1, Rajdeep Das1, Sajith Rajamani1, Rajagopalan Sundaresan1, Harsh Kumar Agarwal1, M Ramasubba Reddy2, and Ramesh Venkatesan1
1GE Healthcare, Bangalore, India, 2Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Body
Diffusion weighted MR imaging (DWI)
is key to pathology detection in anatomies such as brain, abdomen and prostate.
Echo planar imaging (EPI) provides a rapid means to acquire DWI. EPI with variable
k-space sampling scheme and an auto-calibrating image reconstruction technique,
vARC, has recently been shown to reduce distortion in DWI and improve the image
quality in single channel volume coil/body coil acquisitions. Here, we propose a new low
rank reconstruction technique for robust reconstruction and improved image
quality for DWI acquired using vARC’s EPI multi-shot acquisition scheme with
single channel body coil.
Introduction
Diffusion-weighted
MRI(DWI) is widely used for routine clinical and neuroscientific applications[1]. The DWI images are typically acquired with
multi-channel receive coils using single-shot or multi-shot echo-planar imaging
(EPI)[2]. Fast-MRI techniques such as
parallel imaging and partial-Fourier MRI is commonly used to reduce the amount
of distortion in the EPI-DWI acquisition. Multi-shot acquisitions are used to
acquire higher spatial resolution, but they are more prone to ghosting in reconstructions
because of motion-induced phase errors among multi-shot excitations. There
are many reconstructions techniques proposed for multi-shot DWI such as MUSE[3],
POCS-MUSE[2] etc, however, they are limited to multi-channel
acquisitions.
Single-channel DWI suffers
from distortions arising due to B0-inhomogeneity as parallel-imaging
cannot be used with single-channel acquisition. Recently, EPI based
variable multi-shot auto-calibrating (vARC) acquisition was proposed for single-channel
DWI acquisition which can acquire DWI images with clinically
acceptable image distortion[4]. The reduction in effective echo-spacing and
fully sampled center phase encoding lines enable vARC to get improved SNR and
resolution. We propose a locally low-rank regularization (LLR)[5]
approach for reconstruction of vARC diffusion-weighted MRI reconstructions.
This approach is quite suitable in dealing with motion induced phase errors
among different single-channel vARC shots. The proposed vARC-LLR method will
enable widespread adoption of volume coil-based DWI in obese patients who may
not be scanned with surface-coil especially in the non-wide bore commercial MRI
scanners where there is a chance of pinching of coil between patient abdomen
and scanner bore. It may also find it’s use case in pediatric cases where
diffusion imaging is done using smaller volume coils.Methods
Data Acquisition: The data acquisition is same
as that of the vARC[4], wherein the central k-space is fully sampled with
certain calibration width. The outer k-space is subsampled by a factor of
number of shots to be acquired. The subsampled outer k-space resembles typical
multi-shot acquisitions.
Low-Rank Reconstruction: The flow chart for proposed
reconstruction technique is shown in Figure 1. The low-rank methods are
sensitive to initialization, therefore, self-calibrated parallel imaging method,
ARC[6], and partial-Fourier is used to generate robust initialization to
the low rank reconstruction method. In ARC, multiple shots is treated as
multiple coils to fill the missing k-space lines in the outer shot k-space region. Partial-Fourier using POCS reconstruction is done for each shot to generate fully sampled k-space estimate. The fully sampled k-space
estimate is used as an initial guess in shot locally low-rank (LLR) regularization
algorithm. Each iteration of the proposed low rank approach first applies low
rank in the small neighborhood (kernel size=5x5) across all the shots followed
by data consistency to match the acquired k-space with desired accuracy.
Prospective Data Acquisition: Volunteers were scanned for
Abdomen MRI at commercial 1.5T Signa-HDxt MRI (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee)
with informed consent in an institute’s IRB approved study. Commercial EPI-DWI
pulse sequence was modified to prospectively acquire the proposed subsampled
EPI-DWI acquisition. DWI of abdomen (FOV=24cmx24cm,
Matrix Size=256x256 and b-values of 50 and 500s/mm2) was
acquired with surface coil and body-coil. 12-channel surface-coil images were acquired with parallel
imaging acceleration of 2 (12Ch-PI2), single shot and
single channel volume coil (1Ch-SS), and single
channel volume coil vARC with shot factor of 2 (1Ch-vARC2). The scan times are
kept similar for all three DWI scans.Results and Discussion
The abdomen DWI with breadth hold (top row) and
respiratory trigger (bottom row) are shown in Figure 2. The corresponding ADC
maps are shown in Figure 3. The vARC acquisitions with new reconstruction
algorithm demonstrate improved liver diffusion imaging when compared to corresponding
single shot acquisitions for both breath hold and respiratory cases on volume
coil. The values in vARC ADC maps are
more uniform (over short T2 anatomies such as liver) as compared to the values
in single-shot ADC maps. The results are shown for a single volunteer data with
vARC sampling 32 calibration lines.
The
vARC central calibration region helps in getting k-space filled with the right phase, which can be difficult in plain multi-shot or external navigator
acquisitions. The vARC-LLR approach does not require explicit estimations of
the phase maps, instead, it relies on converting smooth phase-modulations
between shots as null space-vectors of a structured matrix. The unacquired data
points in original k-space are filled-in using locally low rank algorithm
applied on structured shot matrix iteratively with support of the initial fully
filled k-space guess, subject to data consistency.
The vARC sampling provides a way to change the
width of central calibration region. It is found that distortions in the final
image is dependent on the width of this region. At the same time, vARC helps in
filling the k-space guess and reduction in aliasing by reducing the phase mismatch
between shots in reconstruction algorithm. The same algorithm with
incorporation of channel sensitivity information is expected to work for multi
shot-multi-channel data.
Conclusions
DWI-MRI
of obese patients acquired using body coil can be done using the proposed vARC-LLR
image acquisition and image reconstruction scheme. The qualitative results
show robustness to micro-/macro-motion induced phase variations across
multiple shots and NEX which would have otherwise caused aliasing. Qualitative result
showed improved SNR with less distortions when compared to single-shot single-channel images. Further assessment with patient population is required.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- Le
Bihan, D., Poupon, C., Amadon, A. and Lethimonnier, F., 2006. Artifacts and
pitfalls in diffusion MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official
Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 24(3),
pp.478-488.
- Kuei-Chen N, Guidon A, Chang
HC, Truong TK, Song Aw, Chen NK. A robust multi‐shot scan strategy for high‐resolution diffusion weighted
MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity‐encoding
(MUSE). NeuroImage. 2013;72:41–47.
- Chu ML, Chang HC, Chung HW,
Truong TK, Bashir MR, Chen NK. POCS‐based
reconstruction of multiplexed sensitivity encoded MRI (POCSMUSE): a general
algorithm for reducing motion‐related
artifacts. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:1336–1348.
- Reddy A, Agarwal H, Das R, Sundaresan
R, Ahmed S, Rajamani S, Mehta B, Wu G, Reddy MR, Venkatesan R. Multi-Shot Liver
Diffusion MRI Using Variable Auto-Calibrating (vARC) Sampling Across Averages,
1146, Proc ISMRM, 2022.
- Hu
Y, Levine EG, Tian Q, et al. Motion-robust reconstruction of multishot
diffusion-weighted images without phase estimation through locally low-rank
regularization. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:1181–1190.
- Brau,
A.C., Beatty, P.J., Skare, S. and Bammer, R. Comparison of reconstruction
accuracy and efficiency among auto-calibrating data‐driven parallel imaging
methods. Magn Reson Med, 2008;59(2): 382-395.