Sijie Zhong1,2, Minjia Chen3, Ke Dai1,4, Hao Chen1,2, Lucio Frydman4, and Zhiyong Zhang1,2
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 3Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, 4Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Artifacts, SPEN
The reconstruction theory of Spatio-temporal encoding
MRI is not complete at present. Aliasing artifacts in SPEN MRI reconstructions can be traced to image contributions
corresponding to high-frequency k-space signals. The k-space picture provides
the spatial displacements, phase offsets and linear amplitude modulations
associated to these artifacts, as well as routes to removing these from the
reconstruction results. These new ways to estimate the artifact priors were
applied to reduce SPEN reconstruction artifacts on simulated, phantom and human
brain MRI data.
Introduction
Spatiotemporal encoded
MRI (SPEN) has a unique advantage in reducing the distortion of fast imaging1-4. Many super-resolved reconstruction methods
based on the point spread function model provide stable reconstruction
performance of under-sampled data, but all of them inevitably have a special
class of boundary shift artifacts5-8. The present study discusses an alternative
description of SPEN MRI, based on a k-space data representation. Such k-space
modeling can simplify the quantitative description of the experiment, and lead
to descriptions of artifacts and their relation to subsampling, which are
simple to grasp based on common criteria. The description also leads to a new
way to estimate artifacts originating from sharp image transitions (“edges”),
from which a novel image reconstruction method was proposed.Methods
SPEN uses a unique linear sweep pulse to replace the excitation
pulse or refocusing pulse in the conventional SE-EPI, which makes the encoding
method superimpose a secondary phase factor along the phase encoding direction
in the image domain. According to the time-frequency property of Fourier
Transform, this coding property can be equally-described as the convolution of
the conventional k-space with the Fourier form of the introduced quadratic
phase, namely:
$$\rho_{\text {spen }}(y)=\rho(y) \cdot e^{-i C y^2} \stackrel{F T}{\Leftrightarrow} \tilde{\rho}_{\text {spen }}(f)=\tilde{\rho}(f) * \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{C}} e^{-i\left(\frac{\pi^2 f^2}{C}-\frac{\pi}{4}\right)}$$
The wavy line on the symbol represents the k-space data, and C
is the coefficient of SPEN encoding feature, which is determined by the
time-bandwidth product $$$Q=C \times F O V_y^2$$$. The frequency encoding direction is consistent with the
conventional model, so it is not explicitly stated here. the quadratic phase
leads to significant amplitude modulations of the signal in addition to the k
frequency encoding, which need to be accounted for.
The undersampling results in the loss of the independent
constraint of the coding system and the unsolvable inverse problem. For
conventional medical images, their energy is often concentrated in
low-frequency components, and the intensity of the central region of k-space is
much stronger than that of other locations. Directly setting the k-space data
of the non-central region in the direction of phase coding zero until the
amount of existing data is sufficient to support the solution of the
reconstructed inverse problem. In this approximation method, the high-frequency
component is discarded and compressed into the low-frequency component by
undersampling, so that the large-interval wide-band SPEN data can be converted
into the small-interval narrow-band conventional MRI data. The distortion of
the reconstruction result can be described as:
$$k_l^{\text {recon }}=\left(A_l^{\text {sub }}\right)^{-1} \cdot A^{\text {sub }} \cdot k^{\text {true }}=k_l^{\text {true }}+\sum_{s=1}^{R-1}\left(A_l^{\text {sub }}\right)^{-1} \cdot A_{h(s)}^{\text {sub }} \cdot k_{h(s)}^{\text {true }}$$
Where 'l' and 'h' respectively describe the low-frequency and
high-frequency components of the response object, ‘A’ refers to the matrix of
SPEN encoding, 'sub' refers to the subspace after under-sampling, and the
second term describes the accumulation of high-frequency signal features at
different positions. The features of the transformation matrix of
high-frequency data are quantified, and the coding properties matching the
features of the image domain are obtained. The details are shown in FIG 1.
We obtain a weighted
factor of image space with proper estimation, which is combined with the TV
constraint of L1 regularization to form an optimization objective with the data
fidelity term. This process effectively attenuates artifacts, as FIG 2 shows.Results and Discussion
FIG. 3 records the
results under simulation data. Under various undersampling modes, the artifacts
in the approximate solutions have different representations, but all of them
are roughly similar to the artifact estimation priors and can be effectively
removed in further optimization.
FIG. 4 shows the results
of 2 oranges and 1 lemon’s imaging. These fruits have cavities at their center
and effects at their surfaces, which can lead to marked field inhomogeneity-driven
distortions (white arrows). The distortion effect is decreased as the
undersampling rate increase. The difference between the approximate solution
and the optimized image has a similar distribution to the estimated artifacts.
FIG. 5 records the
brain with acquisition data. Again, the error performs a great similarity to
the estimated ghost, and the removal or weakening of the undesired feature can
be seen in the zoom-in diagram. Conclusions
A k-space description of SPEN’s reconstruction helps
to better understand the signal characteristics of this MRI technique, and to
improve the quality of its resulting imagesAcknowledgements
This
work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
62001290), Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds (21DZ1100300), sponsored by the National Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Project (2022ZD0208601), and by the Israel Science
Foundation (grants 3594/21 and 1874/22).References
1.
Tal A, Frydman L. Single-scan multidimensional magnetic resonance. Prog. Nucl.
Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2010;57:241–292.
2.
Schmidt R, Frydman L. Alleviating artifacts in 1H MRI thermometry by single
scan spatiotemporal encoding. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med.
2013;26:477–490.
3.
Ben-Eliezer N, Frydman L. Spatiotemporal encoding as a robust basis for fast
three-dimensional in vivo MRI: SPATIOTEMPORAL ENCODING AS A BASIS FOR FAST 3D IN
VIVO MRI. NMR Biomed. 2011;24:1191–1201.
4.
Zhang Z, Seginer A, Frydman L. Single‐scan
MRI with exceptional resilience to field heterogeneities. Magn. Reson. Med.
2017;77:623–634.
5.
Ben-Eliezer N, Irani M, Frydman L. Super-resolved spatially encoded single-scan
2D MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;63:1594–1600.
6.
Cai C, Dong J, Cai S, et al. An efficient de-convolution reconstruction method
for spatiotemporal-encoding single-scan 2D MRI. J. Magn. Reson.
2013;228:136–147.
7.
Chen L, Li J, Zhang M, et al. Super-resolved enhancing and edge deghosting
(SEED) for spatiotemporally encoded single-shot MRI. Med. Image Anal.
2015;23:1–14.
8.
Chen L, Bao L, Li J, Cai S, Cai C, Chen Z. An aliasing artifacts reducing
approach with random undersampling for spatiotemporally encoded single-shot
MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 2013;237:115–124.