Xinzeng Wang1, Yedaun Lee2,3, Joonsung Lee4, Sagar Mandava5, Ty A. Cashen6, Xucheng Zhu7, and Arnaud Guidon8
1GE Healthcare, Houston, TX, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea, Republic of, 3Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea, Republic of, 4GE Healthcare, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 5GE Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, United States, 6GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, United States, 7GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 8GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Cancer, Image Reconstruction, Liver, Pancreas
Stack of Star acquisition is
one of the most frequently used non-Cartesian k-space sampling methods due to
its fast speed and robustness to motion. To further reduce the scan time or
increase the temporal resolution, Stack of Star is often down-sampled with
fewer spokes and advanced sampling patterns, such as golden angle acquisition.
However, this makes Stack of Star prone to noise and streak artifacts, limiting
the in-plane resolution and degrading diagnostic quality. In this work, we
evaluated a deep-learning based stack-of-star method for free-breathing
abdominal imaging and it shows improved diagnostic quality.
Introduction
Radial sampling is one of the
most frequently used non-Cartesian k-space sampling methods due to its fast
speed and robustness to motion. One of the 3D extensions of radial sampling is
Stack of Star acquisition, which is often used in 3D breath-hold/free-breathing
imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging. (1-4)
To further reduce the scan
time or increase the temporal resolution, Stack of Star is often down-sampled
with fewer spokes and advanced sampling patterns, such as golden angle
acquisition. However, this makes Stack of Star prone to noise and streak
artifacts. Many investigators have employed sophisticated reconstruction
techniques to produce artifact-free images, such as using compressed sensing
(CS). However, CS reconstruction is computationally intensive, and the
optimization of reconstruction parameters is also challenging.
In addition to the
under-sampled k-space, respiratory motions and other non-rigid motions in the
abdomen also cause streak artifacts. These streak artifacts are more obvious in
post-contrast Stack of Star images due to the high signal intensity in moving
tissues, reducing the lesion conspicuity. Truncation artifacts are another
common artifact in Stack of Star images due to the limited acquisition matrix
size and scan times. Low-pass filters are also applied in the conventional
reconstruction method to minimize the truncation artifacts, but at the cost of
in-plane resolution. These artifacts limit the in-plane resolution and lesion
conspicuity, resulting in degraded diagnostic quality.
In this work, we evaluated a
deep-learning based reconstruction method (DL Star) to improve the
stack-of-star image quality by removing streak artifacts, truncation artifacts
and noise in MR images.Methods
Pre- and post-contrast liver
and pancreas images were acquired in 5 patients using free-breathing 3D LAVA
Star on a GE 3T MRI scanner (SIGNA Architect, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with
IRB approval and written informed consent. The images were acquired with the
following parameters, Matrix Size = 320 x320, Slice Thickness = 3.4 mm, Flip
Angle = 12o, Repetition Time/Echo Time = 4 ms/1.92 ms, Bandwidth = 325.5 Hz/px,
and Number of Averages = 0.7.
A deep-learning based network
(DL Star) was trained from a database of over 10,000 images to reconstruct
images with a high signal-to-noise ratio, high spatial resolution, and reduced
streak artifacts. A tunable noise reduction factor was offered to accommodate
user preference. The DL Star network was embedded into the conventional
reconstruction pathway to generate two sets of image series (conventional
reconstructed and DL reconstructed images) from a single set of MR raw
data. Results and Discussions
Respiratory motion and other
non-rigid motion in the abdomen often cause streak artifacts in the
conventional stack-of-star images, especially in post-contrast images, as shown
in Figure 1a. These streak artifacts reduce the conspicuity of lesions and
anatomical details, degrading the diagnostic quality. To reduce these streak
artifacts, DL Star reconstruction estimated and removed streak artifacts from
the DL Star images, resulting in improved image quality and conspicuity of
anatomical details, as shown in Figure 1b.
Truncation artifacts are
often visible in stack-of-star images (Figure 2a) due to limited matrix size
and scan times. Truncation artifacts are often suppressed with low-pass
filters, further reducing the in-plane resolution. In contrast, DL Star
reconstruction could suppress truncation artifacts without using low-pass
filters, improving the in-plane resolution, as shown in Figure 2b.
Besides removing streak and
truncation artifacts, DL Star could also reduce noise and improve the SNR, as
shown in Figure 3. At low-field MRI, pre-contrast Stack of Star image could
suffer from low SNR, requiring the acquisition of more spokes and longer scan
times. Since DL Star could reduce noise, it has the potential to be used to
reduce the scan time of Stack of Star at low-field MRI.
With the removal of streaks,
truncation artifacts and noise, DL Star improved in-plane resolution and the
conspicuity of lesions and anatomical details compared to the conventional
reconstruction method. As shown in Figure 4, DL Star improved the visualization
of pancreas with higher in-plane resolution and fewer streak and truncation
artifacts. As shown in Figure 5, lesions also showed better conspicuity in DL
Star post-contrast liver images due to efficient streak artifact removal.
The
improvement is not limited to LAVA Star images, DL Star could also be used in
other Stack of Star applications, such as DISCO Star for dynamic contrast
enhancement imaging. In the future, we will evaluate DL Star with more
patients.Conclusion
The in-plane resolution and
lesion conspicuity of 3D Stack of Star images are well improved with DL Star
due to the promising noise, truncation, and streak artifacts reduction. DL Star
showed the potential to improve the diagnostic quality of Stack of Star applications.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Hersh
Chandarana, etc. Investigative Radiology 2011: 46(10):648-653
[2] Kai Tobias
Block, etc. Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2014; 18(2): 87-106
[3] Shintaro
Ichikawa, etc. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2020; 19(2): 99–107
[4] Hersh
Chandarana, etc. Investigative Radiology 2015: 50(11):749-756