4875

Towards cell-size and switchable magnetocaloric MRI contrast agents using micofabricated thin-film FeRh.
Stephen Dodd1, Natalia Gudino1, O Zadorozhnii2, M Staňo2, J Hajduček2, J. A. Arregi2, Vojtech Uhlíř2, H. Doug Morris3, Mladen Barbic4, and Alan Koretsky1
1Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2Ceitec Magnetism, Central European Institute of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic, 3Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States, 4NYU Langone Health - Tech4Health Institute, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Keywords: Contrast Agent, Cell Tracking & Reporter Genes, Magnetocaloric material

We present progress towards smaller magnetocaloric samples, that drastically change magnetic moment and hence T2* contrast when switched with external magnetic field or temperature, with the eventual goal of achieving a size appropriate for cell tracking. To that end a FeRh sample was microfabricated with a thickness of 200 nm, and patterned with varying linear dimensions from 500 micron down to 1 micron square. We demonstrate that this sample may be switched with temperature and with external field through imaging at 4.7 and 11.7T and with the application of pulsed B0 insert coil.

Introduction

Cell-sized MRI labels with user-switchable contrast ratio would be an attractive development for cell tracking and functional imaging. Previously, we demonstrated the possibility of using magnetocaloric materials like Iron Rhodium (FeRh) as high-contrast ratio switchable agents for generating a controllable T2* MRI contrast, either with temperature, external field, or focused ultrasound (1-3) to distinguish from other endogenous T2* contrast (e.g. blood). However, all the previous results were obtained with “macroscopic” labels with dimensions above 100µm. In this work we explore whether biological-cell-sized (~10µm) magnetocaloric materials can be fabricated, whether they can be imaged in MRI, and whether their contrast in the scanner can be controllably switched with either in situ temperature or field shifters. We demonstrate that lithographically patterned 200-nm thin film FeRh sample may readily generate contrast down to sub-10µm FeRh particle size. We also demonstrate the characteristic sharp phase transition with temperature of these cell-sized magnetocaloric MRI labels. Finally, we explore and find evidence that an additional in situ B0 field shifter also induces label contrast change.

Methods

An epitaxial 200-nm-thick FeRh film was grown on MgO (001) substrates at 450 °C and an argon pressure of 2 mTorr by d.c. magnetron sputtering using an equiatomic target. The film was post-annealed at 800 °C for 45 min and subsequently coated with a 2-nm Pt layer. The FeRh film was patterned into microstructures (Layout in Figure 1) by e-beam lithography and ion-beam etching through a Ti/SiO2 mask. The sample was finally coated with a protective 100-nm-thick SiO2 film. Vibrating sample magnetomer measurement (VSM) in a field of 1T during a temperature sweep is shown in 1B. Baseline gradient-echo MR images (TR/TE=30/10 ms) of the thin film patterned FeRh sample shown in Figure 1, at 11.7T (at 50µm isotropic) and then at 4.7T (100 µm isotropic) at room temperature (~20 degrees C), In these conditions we considered the sample to be in the 'off' low magnetic moment state at 4.7T and in the 'on' high magnetic moment state at 11.7T. To observe the magnetic phase transition, we performed a temperature sweep at 4.7T. The sample tube temperature was controlled with a circulating water bath, and then serial images were acquired during a heating and cooling cycles. A fiber-optic temperature probe was attached to the platform holding the sample. After determining the transition temperature, we performed a preliminary experiment was performed to see if a change in B0 field within the 4.7T magnet could cause a moment change. To this end, a shielded B0 insert coil (Resonance Research Inc, Boston) driven by remotely controlled programmable power supplies was used. The sample was warmed just below the transition temperature point determined from the temperature sweep, temperature stability was monitored for 15 minutes, and MR images were acquired before and after a 0.11T pulse (40 A current), was applied for 2 seconds.

Results and Discussion

With the initial baseline MRIs in Figure 2, one can observe the larger particle signatures from being in the higher field where they would be in their ‘on’ state. There are artifacts from possible air bubbles being trapped under the sample slide, but the pattern is readily visible down to 2-3 microns in the 50 µm resolution image at 11.7T. At 4.7T, the sample signatures are smaller (approximately half the size in linear distance), which is typical of our ‘off’ state. Only 50 µm or larger samples are visible at this point.
The temperature sweep at 4.7T, shown in Figure 3, starting around room temperature (which was determined to be in the ‘off’ state from our baseline images), up to about 50 degrees C demonstrated a significant change in the particle signatures. The area of the 200 µm particle was measured, normalized to the surrounding water, (a threshold of 30% less than mean intensity of the nearby unaffected ROI was used). This is plotted in figure 4. We note the characteristic curve of FeRh we have observed in our previous studies, with a mid-transition temperature of 48 degrees C. As a preliminary test of switching the material with a change of the magnetic field using a 1T coil insert. An increase in the area of the signature from the 200 µm particle of 45% was measured, indicative of a partial shift. The B0 insert is rated to generate a 1T field which we will move toward in future experiments, and it should be sufficient to fully switch the material when close to the transition point.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that micron scale magnetocaloric particles can be used ot modulate MRI contrast with a change in temperature the a fixed imaging field and have opened the possibility of switching the field in the magnet to change moment at a fixed temperature. The patterned FeRh sample was only 200 nm thick and particles down to 10 microns could be detected opening the possibility of labeling biological cells. The characteristic FeRh moment vs temperature curve was observed in larger sample pieces, and we could see the difference in the smaller pieces between the ‘on’ and ‘off’ states with images at 11.7T and 4.7T. We also demonstrated the potential for switching with an additional pulsed external field.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the NIH Intramural Research Program for support, and the Mouse Imaging Facility at NIH for the use of the 4.7T system.

References

M. Barbic, S. Dodd, H. D. Morris, N. R. Dilley, B. Marcheschi, A. Huston, T. D. Harris, and A. P. Koretsky, “Magnetocaloric Materials as Switchable High Contrast Ratio MRI Labels” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81, 2238 (2019).

G. W. Miller, Y. Gilbo, S. J. Dodd, A. P. Koretsky, H. ElBidweihy, and M. Barbic, “Selective fast focal switching of high-contrast-ratio magnetocaloric MRI labels with focused ultrasound” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28, 4119 (2020).

M. Barbic, S. Dodd, H. ElBidweihy, N. R. Dilley, B. Marcheschi, A. L. Huston, H. D. Morris, and A. P. Koretsky, “Multifield and Inverse-Contrast Switching of Magnetocaloric High Contrast Ratio MRI Labels” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 85, 506 (2021).

Figures

Figure 1A. Designed layout of the FeRh sample, starting at 500 µm square down to 1 µm square, each with a thickness of 200 nm. B. The final product, with a few minor defects and debris spots. C. VSM measurements of magnetic moment during a temperature sweep at 1T external field. The high moment state is considered ‘on’ for MRI, and low moment state is considered ‘off’.

Figure 2.A. Sample layout oriented to the MR images. B. 50 um isotropic MR image from plane closest to the sample at 11.7T. Despite the artifacts from the ends, the layout can be seen clearly down to some of the smaller particles at 2-3 um. C 100 um isotropic image of the sample at 4.7T. The marked change is consistent the ‘on’ state at 11.7T and the ‘off’ state at 4.7T. All images were gradient-echo with TR/TE = 30/10 ms. The direction of the B0 field is up-down in all images.

Figure 3 MR images from a temperature sweep at 4.7T. The signature of the larger sample pieces clearly get larger after heating to 50 degrees C, and then returns to baseline during cooling with a lag from the hysteresis as expected. Image resolution here was 150 micron isotropic with 10 ms TE, to get a time resolution of 3 mins. It is noted that the SNR decreases during the hottest parts due to an increased coil resistance and some detuning of the coil that occurs when hot.

Figure 4. Plot of the number of pixels in the signature of the 200 µm particle (bottom right, see inset) in the MR images. The curve follows a similar shape to the magnetic moment vs temperature curves characteristic of the FeRh material. The threshold was set to 70% of the mean intensity of the normalizing ROI to calculate the number of pixels. The highest slope of the curve during heating occurs at around 480 C at 4.7T.

Figure 5. Preliminary result from using an additional external field to switch the particles. After slowly raising temperature to 470C, the image in in A was acquired. Immediately after this a 0.11 T field was applied for 2s, followed by another image acquisition in B. Although only a partial switch we saw an increase of 45% in the number of pixels for the 200 um sample.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
4875
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/4875