Eugene Milshteyn1, Arnaud Guidon1, and Mukesh G. Harisinghani2
1GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, United States, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Prostate, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Increasing the speed of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI)
is highly desirable. However, usual tradeoffs between signal-to-noise (SNR) and
scan time must be considered and impact on quantitative metrics must be
analyzed. One recently proposed approach applied a commercialized deep learning
reconstruction (DL Recon) to prostate T2-weighted imaging, leveraging the
capabilities of the DL algorithm to achieve a robust, high-quality T2-weighted
acquisition in half the time. As such, this work focuses on evaluating the DL Recon
on diffusion weighted imaging, which shows promise to cut acquisition time by
~70% and therefore benefit mpMRI.
Introduction
Multiparametric Prostate MRI
(mpMRI) protocols consist of high resolution multiplanar T2, diffusion weighted
imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) acquisitions1. An
ideal mpMRI protocol meeting or exceeding PIRADS® v2.12
recommendations can take ~25 minutes, even after optimizing protocols using
commercially available acceleration techniques based on conventional
multichannel parallel imaging. The biggest time sinks within these protocols
are the T2 weighted and high b-value DWI acquisitions. There have been several
recent publications focusing on shortening the scan time for these two
acquisitions without loss in diagnostic quality3-5. One study
focused on utilizing a novel, commercialized deep learning reconstruction (DL
Recon) technology (AIR™ Recon DL, GE Healthcare)6 to reduce the multiplanar
T2 acquisition time by 3-fold, without loss in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)3.
The purpose of this study is the application of this DL reconstruction
technology to single-shot DWI acquisitions in the prostate. We focus on
comparisons of the DL reconstruction to conventional reconstructions without
loss in quantitative analysis, as well as the benefits in scan time reduction.Methods
25 patients were scanned using the
standard mpMRI clinical protocol at MGH, on a GE Signa Premier 3T MRI system
(GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). The protocol consists of axial, sagittal,
and coronal T2 weighted scans, Large FOV and FOCUS DWI scans, and a DCE scan.
The parameters for the Large FOV DWI scans are as follows: Matrix size=128x128;
FOV=32x32cm2; Slice thickness=3mm; TR/TE=4705/53.4ms; b-values = 50/800 s/mm2;
number of averages = 2/8; synthetic 1500 s/mm2; Total Scan Time=2min26s.
The parameters for the FOCUS DWI scans are as follows: Matrix size=132x80;
FOV=20x12cm2; Slice thickness=4mm; TR/TE=4500/59.2ms; b-values = 200/2000 s/mm2;
number of averages = 8/18; Total Scan Time=5min56s. The DWI raw data were reconstructed
in two ways, first using the product 2D cartesian reconstruction and second
using the commercialized DL Recon algorithm, which is based on a Convolutional
Neural Network (CNN) trained to remove ringing, reduce noise, and increase
sharpness6. To assess the impact of reducing the number of averages
(NEX) and by extension scan time, we applied the DL Recon to the raw data with
a manual reduction in NEX (from 8 to 4 or 6 for Large FOV DWI/from 18 to 4, 6,
or 9 for FOCUS DWI). The reconstructions were labeled as follows: ALL NEX, ALL
NEX w/DL, and #NEX w/DL, where ALL indicates all averages were kept in
reconstruction, and # indicates 4, 6, or 9 averages were kept in
reconstruction. Within the DL Recon, images were reconstructed with a tunable
noise reduction factor set to 50%. ADC maps were calculated in READY View (GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) for all reconstructed scans, both across the
whole volume and within the prostate in a representative slice. SNR was
calculated in a representative slice of the prostate for the highest acquired
b-values for both Large FOV DWI (b = 800 s/mm2) and FOCUS DWI (b =
2000 s/mm2). The standard deviation of the signal of an ROI in the obturator
internus muscle served as the noise. An independent t-test was used for
statistical analysis, with the ALL NEX conventional reconstruction serving as
the gold standard, and p<0.05 deemed statistically significant.Results
Figures 1 and 2 show
representative Large FOV and FOCUS DWI images, respectively, across all
b-values and all reconstructions, along with the resulting scan time. Figures 3
and 4 show representative ADC maps calculated from the dataset shown in Figures
1 and 2, respectively. Qualitatively, the images with DL Recon applied showed
less noise and increased sharpness as more NEX were kept in the reconstruction.
Even at only 4NEX in both Large FOV and FOCUS DWI cases, the images looked
comparable to the conventional reconstruction with ALL NEX. Figure 5 summarizes
the statistical analysis for each DWI acquisition based on the NEX chosen. Even
with only 4NEX, compared to the conventional reconstruction with ALL NEX, there
was no statistical difference in SNR or ADC for either Large FOV or FOCUS DWI
acquisitions. However, the scan time was calculated to be reduced by up to ~40
and ~70% compared to the conventional acquisitions for Large FOV and FOCUS DWI,
respectively.Discussion
In this study, the proposed
abbreviated DWI scans offer a clinically viable method to reduce scan time by
up to 70% while retaining sufficient SNR thanks to DL Recon. Furthermore, this
reduction in scan time does not incur any penalty in quantitative analysis, as
evidenced by no statistical difference in ADC values. These encouraging results
warrant a continuation of the study, including increasing the cohort size and
calculating CNR in abnormal cases to better understand the effect of DL Recon
on identifying prostatic malignancies. In conclusion, DL Recon offers a new
strategy to reduce scan time in mpMRI of the prostate by alleviating the need
to collect multiple averages for DWI acquisitions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. O’Shea et al. “PIāRADS:
multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in
Physics, Biology and Medicine 2022, Vol. 35, 523-532.
2. Turkbey et al. “Prostate
imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging
reporting and data system version 2,” European Urology 2019, Vol.76, 340–51.
3. O’Shea et al. “Initial
experience in abbreviated T2-weighted Prostate MRI using a Deep Learning
reconstruction,” ISMRM 2020 #2450.
4. Ueda et al. “Deep Learning
Reconstruction of Diffusion-weighted MRI Improves Image Quality for Prostatic
Imaging,” Radiology 2022, Vol. 303, 373-381.
5. Kaye et al. “Accelerating
Prostate Diffusion-weighted MRI Using a Guided Denoising Convolutional Neural
Network: Retrospective Feasibility Study,” Radiology: Artificial
Intelligence 2020, Vol. 2, e200007.
6. Lebel, RM. “Performance
characterization of a novel deep learning-based MR
image reconstruction pipeline,” arXiv
2020.