Keywords: Non-Proton, High-Field MRI, Kidney, Quantitative Imaging
23Na-MRI is a non-invasive tool for the in-vivo quantification of the tissue sodium concentration (TSC); however, it suffers from low in-vivo signals and short relaxation times. High magnetic field strengths, dedicated hardware and pulse sequences as well as various correction methods contribute to obtaining reliable TSCs. In the presented work we employ a custom-built coil and reference vial setup and perform T1, B1+ and B1- corrections that were validated in phantom measurements. We use a sliding window reconstruction for the quantitative 23Na-images to investigate the changes in the TSC before, during and after a water load in two healthy volunteers.
1. F. G. Zöllner et al. NMR Biomed. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3274.
2. S. Haneder et al. Radiology (2011). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11102263
3. A. Scheipers et al. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2021). Abstract: 0238.
4. MAGNETOM 7T, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
5. T. Platt et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27103
6. A. M. Nagel et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22157
7. R. W. Chan et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21837
8. E. K. Insko, L. Bolinger, J. Magn. Reson. (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1993.1133.
9. A. Christ et al. Phys. Med. Biol. (2010); 55:N23-N38.
10. P. A. Hasgall et al. IT’IS database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues, Version 2.6, www.itis.ethz.ch/database.
11. CST Studio Suite 2019/2020 (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France)
12. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA
13. C. J. Lote, (2012), Principles of Renal Physiology, Springer, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3785-7
14. A. Pechère-Bertschi et at. Kidney International (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00158.xFig. 1: A schematic of the workflow employed is depicted from the subdivision of the projections for sliding window reconstruction (a) to the determination of the sodium concentration in the kidneys (h). Quantitative images were acquired with the following parameters: flip angle α=61°, TE/TR=1ms/100ms, nominal spatial resolution (Δx)3=(6mm)3, pulse duration tP=1.8ms, readout time tRO=5ms, number of projections nProj=36000+9000. B1+ maps were acquired with the dual flip angle method7 (α=45°/90°, TE/TR=1.55ms/150ms, (∆x)3=(10mm)3, tP=3ms, tRO=10ms, nProj=4100).
Fig. 2: Comparison of the phantom (35mM) measurements with the round and oval reference vials to the fixed setup, showing the concentrations for the data without correction as well as after B1+ field correction (measured B1+ map) and after both B1+ (measured) and B1- (simulated) correction. The concentration in the whole phantom ROI as well as in the evaluated kidney-emulating ROIs of the first measurement of Volunteer One are plotted. Due to the generally lower positioning of the phantom for the second and third setup, the evaluated ROIs were shifted to emulate the same position.
Fig. 3: Quantitative 23Na concentration in the human torso at 7T for volunteer one (a) and two (b) for a selection of the evaluated subsets during the 1h measurement. At t = 20min, volunteers one and two drank 629ml and 1044ml of water (Na+: 20mg/l) respectively. Slices in each orientation were chosen to visualize the kidneys.
Fig. 4: Change in concentration in the left and right kidney of volunteer one (a) and two (b) after T1, B1+ and B1- corrections during the course of the 1h measurement. Each data subset has a length of 4500 projections, corresponding to a measurement time of 7.5min and an overlap of 2250 projections. At t = 20 min, volunteers one and two drank 629ml and 1044ml of water (Na+: 20mg/l), respectively. Datasets corresponding to the time of the water uptake are indicated by the shaded area. The error bars show the standard deviation within the evaluated ROI.
Fig. 5 (animated figure): Time evolution of the sodium concentration in both volunteers before, during and after the water load. The time equivalent of the reconstructed projection subset is included for reference.