Xin Li1, Wei Huang1, William D. Rooney1, and Charles S Springer1
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Data Analysis, DSC & DCE Perfusion
Using
DCE modeling to quantify prostate transcytolemmal water exchange effect faces
the challenges of often insufficient interstitial contrast agent concentration as
well as suboptimal temporal resolution. Using ultra-high temporal resolution
prostate DCE data, the goal of this work is to investigate the impact of
DCE-MRI temporal alignment between the arterial input function (AIF) and the
tissue time-courses on water exchange quantification. Results here show that
when perfect alignment is not achievable in practice, an earlier AIF bolus
arrival bias will generally reduce the capability for water-exchange
quantification using DCE-MRI.
Introduction
Trans-cytolemmal water exchange effect
in the prostate has been investigated using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI1,2
with limited success. Besides the often
insufficient contrast agent (CA) concentration in the interstitium due to
practical and safety considerations, suboptimal temporal resolution also limits
DCE pharmacokinetic modeling in quantifying the water exchange effect. Using
ultra-high temporal resolution prostate DCE data, the goal of this work is to
investigate the impact of DCE-MRI temporal
alignment between the arterial input function (AIF) and the tissue
time-courses on this issue. Our results show that when perfect alignment is hard to achieve
practically, an earlier AIF bolus arrival bias will generally reduce the ability
for water-exchange quantification. Methods
Seven subjects
underwent 3T (Siemens) prostate multi‑parametric MRI (mpMRI) with an endorectal
RF coil after informed consent. The DCE data were acquired using a 3D
TurboFLASH pulse sequence with a 192*144*20 matrix size and a 270 mm * 203
mm * 60 mm FOV, resulting in (1.4 mm)2 in-plane
resolution and 3 mm slice thickness. Other
parameters were: TR/TE/FA: 2.28 ms/0.89 ms/8º, image frame sampling interval:
1.55 s. A 0.1 mmol/kg CA (Prohance;
Bracco) bolus was administered starting ~30 s after commencing the DCE-MRI
sequence. The total acquisition time was
~3.6 minutes for a total of 140 imaging volumes.
Five mpMRI visible lesions from five subjects
were confirmed by clinical biopsies.
Regions-of-interests (ROIs) were drawn on post-CA DCE images directly. Each individual AIF time-course was obtained from a small ROI completely within the
femoral artery. The amplitude of the AIF was then scaled using the obturator
muscle as reference tissue.1 Voxel-by-voxel pharmacokinetic modeling
of the DCE data employed the Shutter-Speed Model (SSM).3 The
unidirectional cellular water efflux rate constant kio was quantified
in addition to the CA transfer constant, Ktrans, and the
extravascular, extracellular volume fraction, ve. Results
Figure 1a shows a representative post-CA DCE
image. The location of the lesion ROI enclosing the entire enhancing area is
indicated with a red arrow. The location of the contralateral normal-appearing
(NA) ROI is indicated with the green arrow. Panels b
and c show representative voxel DCE time-course
data (filled symbols) with fitting curves for the lesion and NA, respectively.
The SSM fitted parameter values for the lesion voxel are: Ktrans = 0.71 (min-1); ve
= 0.27; kio =3.7 (s-1). Those for the NA voxel are: Ktrans
= 0.065 (min-1); ve
= 0.26; kio =2.3 (s-1).
Temporal
shifts of the individually determined AIFs were then performed manually to
create artificial temporal mis-alignment between the AIF and the tissue
time-courses. Figure 2 shows three
fittings of the same two voxel data
as those in Fig.1, but with an AIF earlier (blue) by two time-frames (3.1s) and later
(black) by two time-frames, respectively, besides the best
temporal-matched one (red). For clarity,
only every 4th data point is plotted here. As expected, the blue
curve rate-of-change is generally less than the black one, especially during
the CA uptake period. Using kio = 50 (s-1)
cutoff, which is generally too large for
reliable kio quantification
using in vivo DCE MRI, the fraction of
voxels with kio > 50 (s-1) for each ROI was
calculated. Figure 3 summarizes the
lesion and NA group fraction means with error bars for standard deviation. As
the AIF temporally shifted from leading, to matching, to lagging the tissue
time-courses, a clear trend of decreased kio > 50 (s-1)
fraction is observed. Discussion
In this work, the effect of
temporal alignment of AIF and tissue DCE time-course on kio
quantification is investigated. A two-frame temporal shift of 3.1 s is approximately
one half of the temporal resolution of ≥ 6.0 s routinely used in clinical
prostate DCE-MRI. This shift therefore approximates a potential intrinsic uncertainty
in CA bolus arrival time determination associated with a clinical DCE-MRI
protocol. Our results indicate that when an AIF leading the tissue curve
bias occurs, the model-fitted curve accelerates more slowly than with a lagging
bias during CA uptake. That is,
pharmacokinetic modeling with an AIF leading the tissue curve will result in a lower
CA concentration in the interstitium during the bolus passage. The water
exchange system is more likely to stay in the fast-exchange-limit condition (larger
apparent kio). In
other words, when perfect alignment is impossible, an AIF temporal bias to the
right (or lagging) will favor the exchange sensitivity and thus the precision in
quantifying kio. With fast DCE sequences like the golden-angle
radial sparse parallel MRI4 available for clinical use, prostate
DCE-MRI with a temporal resolution under 2.0 s is becoming increasingly
practical. This will greatly reduce the mismatch uncertainties in AIF and
tissue temporal signatures and improve water exchange quantification. Acknowledgements
Grant Support:
Brenden-Colson
Center for Pancreatic Care.
Oregon Clinical and Translational
Research Institute, NIH/NCATS.
NIH R01 CA248192
Thorsten Feiweier (Siemens) for
providing the work-in-progress sequence for DWI data acquisition.
References
1.
Li,
Priest, Woodward, Tagge, Siddiqui, Huang, Rooney, Beer, Garzotto, Springer, Magn. Reson. Med. 69:171-178 (2013).
2.
Li,
Cai, Moloney, Chen, Huang, Woods, Coakley, Rooney, Garzotto, Springer, J. Magn. Reson. 269: 104-112 (2016).
3.
Yankeelov,
Rooney, Li, Springer, Magn. Reson. Med.
50:1151-69 (2003).
4.
Feng,
Grimm, Block, Chandarana, Kim, Xu, Axel, Sodickson, Otazo. Magn Reson Med. 72:707-17
(2014).