Nahla M H Elsaid1, Terence Nixon1, Andrew Dewdney2, Andrea De Simone3, Ates Fettahoglu1, and Gigi Galiana1,4
1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, 2Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 3Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, 4Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Gradients, Prostate
This work presents the early performance characteristics of an
inside-out prostate nonlinear gradient (NLG). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could detect prostate cancers non-invasively. However, it requires high b-values, which in turn require
a gradient pulse with a long duration, increasing the echo time. A longer echo
time means a lower SNR and lower contribution from short T2 components. NLG
coil circumvents this issue by having a gradient with a high amplitude within a
limited field of view, which applies to prostate imaging.
Introduction
The
lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is approximately 1/9 for
American men, but because of slow progression and the significant morbidities
associated with therapy, treatment for many cases can often be declined or
delayed.1 Moreover,
prostate cancer is considered the second leading cancer killer of men, so the early
detection of aggressive prostate cancers is crucial. Accordingly, a sensitive imaging
method that distinguishes benign or low-grade prostate lesions from aggressive
ones is one of the greatest needs in prostate cancer. Diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) is currently one of the best ways to detect prostate cancers
non-invasively.2 According
to the new PI-RADS guidelines 3, it is
recommended to acquire a few DWIs, one of which has a b-value ≥ 1400 s/mm2.
While using linear gradients, such a high b-value would require a gradient
pulse with a long duration which will increase the echo time and, in turn, that
will compromise the image SNR. However, using a nonlinear gradient (NLG) coil
can circumvent this issue by having a gradient with a high amplitude within a
limited field of view, which applies to prostate imaging. Some earlier work investigated the feasibility of using non-linear gradients with diffusion in 4. Here we
present some initial performance characteristics of an inside-out nonlinear
gradient (shown in Figure 1) for prostate imaging and the feasibility of DWI and ADC
mapping using a polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) phantom.Methods
Initial performance
characteristics
Heating and vibrations,
as well as inductive coupling, were assessed. In addition, B1 mapping was performed
using a dual flip angle sequence with and without the presence of the gradient.
Phantom
DWI experiments
We
created a PVP water solution phantom with different PVP concentrations, which
is considered a good candidate for a non-toxic diffusion MR phantom.5 Different
concentrations of PVP were created by adding PVP40 (Sigma-Aldrich, average wt
40,000) to distilled water, ranging from 5% to 50% w/v. Diffusion data of the
phantom was acquired twice, once with the NLG coil and another time with the
linear gradient coil for validation. The linear gradient scan consisted of
b-values of 0, 200, 400, and 600 s/mm2. The
b-values of the NLG vary based on the location, and three DWI were used for ADC
fitting.Results
Neither heating nor vibration was observed in initial studies. Inductive
coupling from linear gradients was also tested and appeared to generate <10V
peak voltage (see Figure 2b). Figure 3a shows the detected gradient strength scaled
to 320A of current. Other studies (not shown) have verified linearity with
amplitude with current input. As expected, gradients of 500mT/m are detected in
the HF direction inferior to the coil, where prostate ROI is targeted.
Preliminary B1 maps (Figure 3b) indicate that the gradient does not
significantly affect excitation.
Figures 4.c and 4.d show the ADC maps calculated using scans with linear and
nonlinear gradient coils respectively. In addition, Figure 5 shows that both
scans produced the expected inverse linear relationship between the diffusivity
and the PVP concentrations.Discussion and conclusion
Initial experience with a
new inside-out gradient design for high-gradient strength in prostate DWI is
promising. No heating or vibration was observed. Field shape and gradient
strength are well aligned with design specifications delivering strong
gradients in the region of interest. In addition, the non-linear
gradient coil produced similar diffusivity results with different PVP
concentrations to those produced using the linear gradient coil. The non-linear
gradient coil produced similar diffusivity results with different PVP
concentrations to those produced using the linear gradient coil.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Siegel,
R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 70, 7-30, doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590
(2020).
2. Rud,
E. & Baco, E. Re: Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Jelle O. Barentsz, Peter L. Choyke,
et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.
Eur Urol 2016;69:16-40: Is Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Really
Necessary When Searching for Prostate Cancer? Eur Urol 70, e136,
doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.017 (2016).
3. Kwon,
M. R., Kim, C. K. & Kim, J. H. PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted
imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm(-)(2). Br J Radiol 90, 20170438, doi:10.1259/bjr.20170438 (2017).
4. Feldman,
R. E. et al. Results for
diffusion-weighted imaging with a fourth-channel gradient insert. Magn Reson Med 66, 1798-1808, doi:10.1002/mrm.22971 (2011).
5. Pierpaoli, C., Sarlls, J., Nevo,
U., Basser, P. J. & Horkay, F. in ISMRM 2009.