Tianjia Zhu1,2, Minhui Ouyang1,3, Xuan Liu4, Risheng Liu4, and Hao Huang1,3
1Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 4School of Information Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques, Microstructure, machine learning/artificial intelligence, neuro
Advanced diffusion MRI (dMRI) has enabled
noninvasive assessment of conventional cortical histological measures. However,
analytical models are limited by their restrictive model assumptions and lack
of validation from quantitative histology. We have developed a Diffusion-MRI
based Estimation of Cortical micro-Architecture (DECAM) method using a novel
deep learning technique Best Response Constraint Generative Adversarial Network
(BRC-GAN) for accurately estimating cortical soma density (SD) leveraging
rich dMRI data information. By providing high-fidelity, reproducible
whole-brain estimated SD maps validated with histology, DECAM paves the way for
data-driven noninvasive virtual histology for potential applications such as
Alzheimer’s diseases.
Purpose
Advanced diffusion MRI (dMRI) has enabled
noninvasive assessment of conventional cortical histological measures1-9.
However, analytical models are limited by their restrictive model assumptions
and lack of validation from quantitative histology. Traditional machine
learning methods such as random forest regression lack the rich neighborhood
information in diffusion MRI image patches and provide overly simplistic model
for representing the complex relationship between dMRI signal and
microstructure. By introducing a discriminator network that teaches the
generative network how realistic the generative outputs are compared to
ground-truth, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can greatly improve the fidelity in image generation and
prediction tasks. The Best Response Constraint further improves the GAN by
putting a constraint on the discriminator parameters that only allows for the
best performing discriminator that optimizes the discriminator cost function10(Fig.
3a). Based on best response constraint (BRC) generative adversarial network
(GAN), we have developed Diffusion-MRI based Estimation of Cortical micro-Architecture
(DECAM)11, a deep learning and dMRI-based method accurately
estimating cortical soma density (SD) leveraging complementary information in
diffusion weighted image volumes. By providing high-fidelity and reproducible
estimated SD maps validated with histology, DECAM paves the way for data-driven
noninvasive virtual histology for potential applications such as Alzheimer’s
diseases.Methods
DMRI for macaque (Fig. 1a)
DMRI acquisitions with two b-values (b=1500,
4500s/mm2) and 30 gradient directions were performed on a normal postmortem
Rhesus macaque brain with in-plane resolution 0.6×0.6mm2, slice
thickness=2mm, 2 repetitions for each b-value.
Quantification of soma density
from histological images
For measuring SD for macaques (Fig. 2), the
Nissl-stained histology images of resolution 0.46µm/pixel12 were
blocked into segments with size of 0.24×0.24 mm2, respectively.
Segments are gray-scaled and threshold. SD is defined as number of contoured
areas/ segment area in mm2. The calculated SD map agrees well with
SD from histology13.
Histology-MRI registration (Fig. 1a)
10 Nissl
histology slices were gray-scaled and affine registered to average diffusion
weighted image (aDWI). SD map was affine registered to aDWI using the same
transformation. The registered dMRI volumes and SD maps were cut to 3 by 3
patches and served as training data.
Training Best Response Constraint (BRC)
Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)
By introducing a discriminator network
that teaches the generative network how realistic the generative outputs are
compared to ground-truth, GANs can greatly improve the fidelity in image
generation and prediction tasks. The Best Response Constraint further improves
the GAN by putting a constraint on the discriminator parameters that only
allows for the best performing discriminator that optimizes the discriminator
cost function10 (Fig. 3a). More
specifically, the BRC is a constraint S(θG)
on discriminator parameters θD that
maximizes the discriminator cost function f(θG, θD). The
generator parameters θG optimize the generator cost function
only within the constraint that θD
stays in S(θG).
We
implemented a Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) with the BRC and
trained the model with an Adam optimizer with beta=0.9999 and learning
rate=0.0002 for 40 epochs. A mean-squared-error cost function between predicted
images and ground-truth was added to the generator cost function to aid
prediction.
Estimation of soma density
Whole brain SD was estimated on
two separate macaque subjects not used for training the network, and SD was
also predicted for a held-out slice on the training macaque brain. Results
Fig.3b
shows the improvement of BRC-WGAN-GP over regular WGAN-GP on a held-out slice
for predicting Nissl staining intensity. In the deep gray matter (GM) region,
the predicted Nissl staining from BRC-WGAN-GP can clearly show the contrast
between deep GM and the internal capsule, while traditional WGAN-GP cannot (red
arrows). Estimated SD from noninvasive DECAM on macaque brain are shown in Fig.
4a. A high spatial correspondence and a low residual between histology
ground-truth and DECAM-derived SD (Fig. 4a) maps can be observed. Moreover, the
estimated SD significantly correlate with the ground-truth values (Fig. 4b)
(p<0.0001, Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.53). The mean absolute error
(MAE) for predicting SD is 0.0235×104 somas/mm2. Fig. 5
shows reproducible estimated SD on two test macaque subjects not used for
training. The pattern of higher soma density in the superior temporal gyrus can
be clearly appreciated (red arrows).Discussion and conclusion
We
qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate high correspondence between the
DECAM-estimated SD maps and ground-truth in macaques. We also show
reproducibility across subjects for whole-brain cortical SD maps. BRC-WGAN-GP
outperforms traditional GAN in deep gray matter region important to Alzheimer’s
pathology. By providing high-fidelity, reproducible estimated SD and ND maps
validated with histology, DECAM paves the way for paradigm-shifting data-driven
noninvasive virtual histology for potential applications such as Alzheimer’s
diseases.Acknowledgements
This study is funded by NIH R01MH092535, R01MH125333, R01EB031284, R21MH123930 and P50HD105354.References
1. Stanisz GJ, Wright GA, Henkelman RM,
Szafer A. An analytical model of restricted diffusion in bovine optic nerve
Magn Reson Med. . 1997;37:103-111.
2. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H,
Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of
magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:1432-1440.
3. Zhou XJ, Gao Q, Abdullah O, Magin RL.
Studies of anomalous diffusion in the human brain using fractional order
calculus. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:562-569.
4. Jespersen SN, Kroenke CD, Østergaard L,
Ackerman JJ, Yablonskiy DA. Modeling dendrite density from magnetic resonance
diffusion measurements. NeuroImage.
2007;34:1473-1486.
5. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott
CA, Alexander DC. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and
density imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage. 2012;61:1000-1016.
6. Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion
MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. NeuroImage. 2012;61:324-341.
7. Alexander DC, Dyrby TB, Nilsson M, Zhang
H. Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications.
NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e3841.
8. Novikov DS, Fieremans E, Jespersen SN,
Kiselev VG. Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: Theory and
parameter estimation. NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e3998.
9. Zhu T, Peng
Q, Ouyang A, Huang H. Neuroanatomical underpinning of diffusion kurtosis
measurements in the cerebral cortex of healthy macaque brains. Magn Reason Med.
2021; 85:1895-1908.
10. Liu, R.,
Gao, J., Liu, X., & Fan, X. Revisiting GANs by Best-Response Constraint:
Perspective, Methodology, and Application. 2022; arXiv preprint
arXiv:2205.10146.
11. Zhu T, Ouyang M, Huang H. Diffusion-MRI
based Estimation of Cortical Architecture using Machine-learning (DECAM). 2022; ISMRM 2022 abstract number: 0257
12. Mikula S, Trotts I, Stone JM, Jones EG.
Internet-enabled high-resolution brain mapping and virtual microscopy. 2007; NeuroImage.
;35:9-15.
13. Carlo CN,
Charles FS. Structural uniformity of neocortex, revisited.2013; PNAS. 110.4: 1488-1493.