Keywords: Heart, Myocardium
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of assessing myocardial microvascular perfusion of patients with exertional heat illness (EHI) by intravoxel incoherent motion imaging.
Methods: CMR-IVIM image quality was evaluated with a 3-point scale. CMR-IVIM derived parameters were analyzed and compared between EHI and HC. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used.
Results: CMR-IVIM image quality were significantly improved. EHI patients showed decreased D*, decreased f values and higher D values compared to HC. f showed the most robust efficacy for detecting EHI related myocardial injury with the highest area under the curve.
Conclusion: CMR-IVIM can evaluate myocardial injury of EHI patients.
1. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC white paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(17): 1475-87.
2. Delattre BM, Viallon M, Wei H, et al. In vivo cardiac diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Quantification of normal perfusion and diffusion coefficients with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Invest Radiol 2012; 47(11): 662-70.
3. Mou A, Zhang C, Li M, et al. Evaluation of myocardial microcirculation using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46(6): 1818-28.
4. An DA, Chen BH, Rui W, et al. Diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of the dynamic status of myocardial perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 48(6): 1602-9.
5. Terrier B, Dechartres A, Gouya H, et al. Cardiac intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with T1 mapping to assess myocardial perfusion and fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: Association with cardiac events from a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72(9): 1571-80.
6. Rapacchi S, Wen H, Viallon M, et al. Low b-value diffusion-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Initial results in humans using an optimal time-window imaging approach. Invest Radiol 2011; 46(12): 751-8.
7. Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H, et al. Myocardial strain imaging: Review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 20(6): 605-19.
8. Claus P, Omar AMS, Pedrizzetti G, et al. Tissue tracking technology for assessing cardiac mechanics: Principles, normal values, and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8(12): 1444-60.
9. Bouchama A, Knochel JP. Heat stroke. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(25): 1978-88.
10. Dronca M, Pasca SP, Nemes B, et al. Cardiac markers (bnp, nt-pro-bnp, troponin i, troponin t, in female amateur runners before and up until three days after a marathon. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46(6): 880-1.
11. Rajiah PS, Kalisz K, Broncano J, et al. Myocardial strain evaluation with cardiovascular mri: Physics, principles, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2022; 42(4): 968-90.
Panel A. A 23-year-old (first row) healthy male had normal LGE image, D value (2.13 x 10-3mm2/s), D* value (152.74 x 10–3 mm2/s) and f value (0.582). Panel B. A 23-year-old male (middle row) with EHI shows negative LGE, but the D value is increased (3.01 x 10-3 mm2/s), while D* value (102.74 x 10–3 mm2/s) and f (0.318) value are reduced. Panel C. A 21-year-old (bottom row) with EHI and positive LGE in the LV septal segment (arrow) had higher D value (3.72 x 10-3 mm2/s), reduced D* value (98.21 x 10–3 mm2/s) and f value (0.286).
Receiver-operator characteristics curve (ROC) analyses to assess diagnostic performance of CMR-IVIM parameters in the myocardial injury of EHI. AUC = area under the ROC curve.