Afis Ajala1, Seung-Kyun Lee1, Nastaren Abad1, and Thomas Foo1
1GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Gradients, Arterial spin labelling, Concomitant Field Correction
Magnetic resonance imaging using 3D
stack-of-spirals at 3T on a high-performance gradient system such as the MAGNUS
can be subject to strong second-order concomitant magnetic fields (SOCG), which
can lead to signal dropout and blurring artifacts that become more significant
at locations that are farther from the gradient isocenter. SOCG cannot be
corrected by pre-emphasis of gradient waveforms and/or radio frequency modulation
alone, and hence requires higher-order hardware or software solution. We demonstrate
a software-based correction of SOCG in 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin
labelling with a stack-of-spirals k-space trajectory by nulling the phase contributed
by SOCG during reconstruction.
Introduction
Fast spin echo (FSE) with 3D stack-of-spirals
(SOS) k-space encoding is often used for the readout of a 3D pseudo-continuous
arterial spin-labeling (3DpCASL) pulse sequence. High-performance gradient
systems, such as the MAGNUS, that can simultaneously achieve a strong gradient
amplitude (Gmax) of 200 mT/m and a maximum slew rate (SRmax) of 500 T/m/s on
each axis from a standard 620A/1400 V gradient driver have been used for rapid
and high-quality 3DpCASL acquisitions at 3 T1,2. However, the utilization of
higher Gmax, at a main magnetic field strength of 3T, is accompanied by stronger
second-order concomitant gradient (SOCG) fields that cannot be corrected by
pre-emphasis of gradient waveforms and/or radio frequency modulation alone3,4. Such SOCG can lead to signal
dropout as well as in-plane and through-plane blurring (that increase with
off-center distance) in 3DpCASL acquisitions. Here we retrospectively correct SOCG-induced
erroneous phase in 3DpCASL by slice-dependent k-space phase compensation based
on calculated SOCG in spiral readout. Successful correction is demonstrated in
proton density (PD) and perfusion-weighted (PW) images of a phantom and a volunteer
respectively.Materials and Methods
The acquired
3DpCASL raw signal $$$(S)$$$ that
is corrupted by phase due to SOCG ($$$\phi_{c_2}$$$)
is given as
$$
\tag{1}
{S(k_x,k_y,k_z)= \iiint\rho(x,y,z)e^{-i(k_xx+k_yy+k_zz)e^{-i\phi_{c_2}}}dxdydz}
$$
where $$$\rho(x,y,z)$$$ is the uncorrupted image, and we have ignored
resonance relaxation effects. Considering that the k-space of our
3DpCASL was encoded using a 3D SOS with phase encoding in the $$$k_z$$$ direction (Figure 1), the dominant contribution to SOCG comes from the $$$x$$$ and $$$y$$$ gradients $$$(G_x$$$ and $$$G_y)$$$ during the readout interval. Hence $$$\phi_{c_2}$$$ is given by Bernstein et al as5:
$$
{\phi_{c_2}(z)=\frac{\gamma z^2 }{2B_0}\cdot \int_0^t\left(G_x^2(t')+G_y^2(t')\right)dt'}
\tag{2}
$$
To correct
for $$$\phi_{c_2}$$$, we
took an initial inverse z-transform of $$$S$$$ (by multiplying Equation (1) with $$$e^{-ik_zz'}$$$ and integrated over $$$k_z$$$) to
obtain:
$$
{S'(k_x,k_y,z')=\iint\rho(x,y,z')e^{-(k_xx+k_yy)e^{-i\phi_{c_2}(z'^2)}}dxdy}
\tag{3}
$$
$$$S'$$$ was corrected by nulling $$$\phi_{c_2}$$$ on each slice (or $$$z'$$$) location before re-gridding to a cartesian coordinate
system. A 2D inverse Fourier transform (in the $$$x$$$ and $$$y$$$ directions) of the
re-gridded data was then used to obtain the corrected images, $$$\rho(x,y,z')$$$ at each slice location.
MRI Experiments: All 3DpCASL experiments were carried out on a MAGNUS gradient system
with firmware patches for zeroth- and first-order eddy current and concomitant
fields correction6,7. The Gmax, SRmax,
and receiver bandwidth (rBW) of the spirals satisfied the azimuthal Nyquist
criterion that is required to prevent k-space undersampling8. The labeling delay
and post labeling delay for the acquisitions were set to 1450 ms and 1525 ms
respectively. Acquired raw k-space data were processed for image reconstruction
with and without SOCG correction. Image reconstruction was carried out in MATLAB
(Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) using the Orchestra software development kit (GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA).
Phantom and Volunteer
Acquisition: Phantom experiments were carried out using a 10 cm-diameter American
College of Radiology MRI quality control phantom. The phantom was axially placed at 8 cm from
the isocenter of the MAGNUS gradient and PD images were acquired using the
3DpCASL pulse sequence. Acquisition rBW and field of view (FOV) were 500 kHz and
20 mm respectively. The Gmax and SRmax of the spiral-out waveform design, and other
details of the phantom experiment are shown in Figure 2C. A single volunteer
(age 49, male) was imaged under IRB approved protocol after a written informed
consent was received. PD and PW images were obtained using the 3DpCASL pulse
sequence with rBW and FOV of 500 kHz and 24 mm respectively. Acquisition Gmax, SRmax
and other details of the volunteer experiment are shown in Figure 2C. Cerebral
blood flow (CBF) was calculated using the PW and PD images as previously
described in the ASL consensus9.Results and Discussions
Results of
our phantom acquisition showed that there is visible reduction of in-plane
blurring (at slice location of 82 mm) in the corrected 3DpCASL images compared
to the uncorrected reconstruction (Figure 4). Some gradient non-linearity
artifacts are visible in the phantom images since we are close to the edge of
spherical volume of the MAGNUS. In in vivo scans, there were differences of up to
10% (especially around the white and gray matter interfaces) at 70 mm from the
gradient isocenter between the corrected and uncorrected 3DpCASL PW images (Figure
4) and CBF estimations (Figure 5).
In this work, we
demonstrated the effect of SOCG correction in 3DpCASL acquisitions with a
spiral-out readout, as spiral k-space encoding has a low tolerance for such
phase errors. The SOCG correction method described here is retrospective and
does not require any additional pulse programming or compromise in imaging
performance. The current method may also be combined with hardware correction
methods to remove any residual SOCG phase after image acquisition. As a future
work, this correction method can be extended for nulling the SOCG phase accrued
in a full 3D spiral acquisition (without any Cartesian phase encoding) on a
pixel-by-pixel basis. Since the computation time of such pixel-by-pixel
correction may be excessive, a volumetric-patch-based correction may be considered
for faster reconstruction.Conclusion
A retrospective
SOCG correction method has been implemented for the correction of erroneous
phase accruals due to SOCG in 3DpCASL acquisitions in the MAGNUS high
performance gradient system.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by CDMRP W81XWH-16-2-0054. This presentation does not necessarily represent the official views of
the funding agency. We also thank H. Doug Morris for the help rendered during our data gathering.References
1. Foo,
T. K. F. et al. Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert
gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate
at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 83, 2356–2369 (2020).
2. Ajala, A. et al. 3D
Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling Acquisition using a High-Performance
Gradient System: A Scan Time and Image Quality Assessment. in ISMRM 2022
Annual Proceedings (2022).
3. Tao, S. et al. Gradient
Pre-Emphasis to Counteract First-Order Concomitant Fields on Asymmetric MRI
Gradient Systems. Magn Reson Med 77, 2250–2262 (2017).
4. Weavers, P. T. et al. B0
concomitant field compensation for MRI systems employing asymmetric transverse
gradient coils. Magn Reson Med 79, 1538–1544 (2018).
5. Bernstein, M. A., King, K. F. &
Zhou, X. J. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. (Elsevier Academic Press,
2004).
6. Tao, S. et al. The Effect of
Concomitant Fields in Fast Spin Echo Acquisition on Asymmetric MRI Gradient
Systems. Magn Reson Med 79, 1354–1364 (2018).
7. TAO, S., TRZASKO, J. D., Shu, Y.,
WEAVERS, P. T. & BERNSTEIN, M. A. Systems and methods for concomitant field
correction in magnetic resonance imaging with asymmetric gradients. (2016).
8. Kang, D. et al. The effect of
spiral trajectory correction on pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling with
high-performance gradients on a compact 3T scanner. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
84, 192–205 (2020).
9. Alsop, D. C. et al. Recommended
implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical
applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European
consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73, 102–116
(2015).