Aurelien Destruel1,2,3, Franck Mauconduit4, Aurélien Massire5, Vincent Gras4, and Virginie Callot1,2,3
1Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France, 2APHM, Hôpital Universitaire Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France, 3iLab-Spine, International Associated Laboratory, Montréal, Canada, Marseille, France, 4Paris-Saclay University, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin, Gif-sur-yvette, France, 5Siemens Healthcare SAS, Saint-Denis, France
Synopsis
Keywords: RF Pulse Design & Fields, Spinal Cord
One of the best solutions to B
1 inhomogeneities observed at ultra-high
field MRI is to use parallel transmit techniques (pTx). However, fast and
accurate knowledge of the B
1+ is required. The presaturated TurboFLASH
(satTFL)-based B
1-mapping sequence, with interferometric encoding, has shown
great promise due to its speed and reliability, but it was observed that its
performance may drop when used with unconventional radiofrequency coils and
applications. In this study, a novel optimization of the interferometric
encoding is presented and applied to cervical spinal cord MRI at 7T. The impact
of having improved B
1-maps is evaluated on pTx MP2RAGE-based T
1-mapping.
Introduction
Parallel
transmit (pTx) techniques are promising solutions to mitigate B1-related
issues1–3. As they require B1
generated by each channel, having accurate B1-maps is primordial. Several
B1-mapping sequences have been developed, with varying results4, with one of the most accurate
being the actual flip angle (AFI) sequence, although it is prohibitively slow
for mapping multiple RF channels5. Alternatively, the presaturated
TurboFLASH (satTFL) method with interferometry encoding can provide fast individual
B1-maps4 from acquired linear combinations B1lc
of RF channels:
$$$ B_{1 ,i}^{lc}=∑_k A_{i,k} B_{1,k} $$$ and $$$ B_{1 ,k}=∑_i (A^{-1} )_{i,k} B_{1,k}^{lc} $$$
where $$$ i $$$ is the i-th RF mode, $$$ k $$$ is the k-th RF-channel, and $$$ A$$$ is the
interferometry encoding matrix. Simple $$$A$$$-matrices are
used, such as ‘One-inv’ (one channel has opposite phase than others)6, and optimization of diagonal
elements of $$$ A$$$ was proposed7. In this work, we evaluate the
accuracy of the satTFL for cervical spinal cord compared with the AFI and apply
a novel optimization of the interferometric encoding, as it was
observed that B1-inhomogeneities resulted in signal drops over all
B1lc with the used RF coil. The influence of the
optimization was evaluated on in vivo quantitative T1-mapping from
MP2RAGE with pTx .Methods
B
1-mapping
was performed at 7T (TERRA, Siemens Healthcare, Germany), with a Rapid 8Tx/8Rx cervical spine coil loaded with
the SAM phantom (Speag, Switzerland)
8, and with two volunteers (Fig.3).
SatTFL was used
to measure 2D-axial individual B
1-maps with interferometric
acquisitions from a modified version using a Shinnar-Le Roux saturation pulse
9 with two methods:
- Interferometric10: Eight RF modes i, with and
without presaturation-pulse; effective flip angle $$$β_{i}^{lc} = acos(sig_i^{sat}/sig_i^{nosat}).$$$
- Hybrid11,12: Eight RF modes i, without
presaturation pulse and a single reference B1-map, with $$$β_{i}^{lc} = β_{ref}.(sig_i^{nosat}/sig_{ref}^{nosat})$$$ and $$$β_{ref}^{lc} = acos(sig_{ref}^{sat}/sig_{ref}^{nosat}).$$$
After initial
acquisitions with ‘One-inv’, the complex elements of $$$ A $$$ (interferometric: eight encoding modes; hybrid:
reference + eight encoding modes) were optimized. A flow chart summarizing the methods
is shown in Fig.1. The Matlab pattern search global optimization was used with ‘One-inv’
encoding as starting point, 10g-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR
10g)
as constraint, and 3000 iterations. The cost function was the normalized
root-mean-square error (NRMSE), inside a region-of-interest (ROI), between complex
acquired individual B
1-maps and those obtained from calculated
signal images:
- Effective excitation and
presaturation FA, α and β, were calculated by numerical integration of the
Bloch equation using the measured B1.
- $$$ sin_{i}^{nosat} = sin(α) + n_1 $$$ and $$$ sin_{i}^{sat} = sin(α).cos(β) + n_2 $$$ , with $$$n_1$$$ and complex Rice
noise scaled to obtain SNR = 15. The signal model could be simplified as the
ratio of the two images is used.
To validate the
performance of the optimizations, individual B
1-maps were acquired
with each optimized satTFL method, and two absolute B
1-maps were calculated.
Actual flip angle (AFI) sequences were acquired with those RF shims and compared
with each satTFL method to demonstrate the added value of the optimization.
To further
evaluate the influence of the optimized satTFL, MP2RAGE-based T
1-maps
were finally acquired using pTx pulses calculated from the different hybrid
satTFL
13, and compared with standard
acquisition with vendor RF pulses, and B
1+-correction
8.
Results
Fig.2 shows sagittal views of the calculated and measured B1-maps,
and the contour of the ROI in which the B1 reliability was
optimized. Results show a substantially better match with the AFI in the region
of low FA after optimization, corresponding to lower cord levels (white arrows). This led to lower accuracy outside the ROI, however this signal is not used in the targeted applications.
Fig.3 confirms those observations, showing a scatter plot of calculated
B1 maps compared with the AFI. Although the One-inv and Optimized
methods have similar accuracies around FA=50° to 60°, substantial improvement
of the match is observed at lower FA (phantom) and higher FA (in vivo) after
optimization.
A quantification of this observation is shown in Table.1 (top), as the NMRSE
and percentage errors compared with the AFI, showing that reduction of errors up
to 46% was achieved. The hybrid Optimized method provided the best accuracy and
fastest acquisition.
Fig.4 shows T1-maps at three cervical levels, showing greater
GM/WM contrast with pTx pulses. Table.1 (bottom) shows that pTx MP2RAGE provides results within inter-session reproducibility without need to correct for B1-inhomogeneity,
with more reliable results when using optimized satTFL.Discussion and Conclusion
This study shows that although satTFL provides fast and accurate B1-maps,
it deteriorates in some regions with the commonly used ‘One-inv’ (using the C-spine RF coil). This impacts the prediction of absolute B1-maps in low SNR
regions when using pTx, which can be observed in quantitative T1 measures.
Optimizing the amplitude and phase of the matrix $$$ A $$$ greatly improves accuracy
inside ROI.
Because of the large number of degrees-of-freedom (128 and 144 for Interferometry and Hybrid methods, respectively), the stopping criteria was
reached in about 1h. Rather than a patient-specific optimization, the optimization
of the matrix $$$ A $$$ should be calculated offline including a wide range of acquired
in-vivo B1-maps to find a ‘universal’ solution, similar to universal
pTx pulses used in the brain1. Future works will further investigate
in-vivo results, and the reliability of the optimization between anatomies. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by ARSEP, Institut Marseille Imaging, A*midex
and France Life Imaging.References
1. Gras
V, Vignaud A, Amadon A, Le Bihan D, Boulant N. Universal pulses: A new concept
for calibration-free parallel transmission. Magn Reson Med.
2017;77(2):635-643. doi:10.1002/mrm.26148 SMASH
2. Padormo F, Beqiri A, Hajnal JV, Malik
SJ. Parallel transmission for ultrahigh-field imaging. Nmr in Biomedicine.
2016;29(9):1145-1161. doi:10.1002/nbm.3313 SMASH
3. Destruel A, Jin J, Weber E, et al.
Integrated Multi-Modal Antenna With Coupled Radiating Structures (I-MARS) for
7T pTx Body MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2022;41(1):39-51.
doi:10.1109/TMI.2021.3103654 SMASH
4. Bosch D, Bause J, Geldschläger O,
Scheffler K. Optimized ultrahigh field parallel transmission workflow using
rapid presaturated TurboFLASH transmit field mapping with a three-dimensional
centric single-shot readout. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2023;89(1):322-330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29459 SMASH
5. Yarnykh VL. Actual flip-angle imaging
in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the
transmitted radiofrequency field. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(1):192-200.
doi:10.1002/mrm.21120 SMASH
6. Tse DHY, Poole MS, Magill AW, Felder J,
Brenner D, Shah NJ. Encoding methods for B1+ mapping in parallel transmit
systems at ultra high field. Journal of Magnetic Resonance.
2014;245:125-132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2014.06.006 SMASH
7. Malik SJ, Larkman DJ, Hajnal JV.
Optimal linear combinations of array elements for B1 mapping. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 2009;62(4):902-909.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22068 SMASH
8. Massire A, Taso M, Besson P, Guye M,
Ranjeva JPP, Callot V. High-resolution multi-parametric quantitative magnetic
resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord at 7T. NeuroImage. Published online 2016.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.055 SMASH
9. Amadon A, Boulant N, Cloos MA, et al. B1 mapping of an 8-channel TX-array
over a human-head-like volume in less than 2 minutes: the XEP sequence, In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ISMRM 2010.
10. Brunner DO, Pruessmann KP. B1(+) interferometry
for the calibration of RF transmitter arrays. Magn Reson Med.
2009;61(6):1480-1488. doi:10.1002/mrm.21893 SMASH
11. Moortele PF van de, Snyder CJ, DelaBarre
L, Adriany G, Vaughan T, Uğurbil K. Calibration Tools for RF Shim at Very High
Field with Multiple Element RF Coils : from Ultra Fast Local Relative Phase to
Absolute Magnitude B 1 + Mapping. In: ; 2007.
12. Bosch D, Müller F, Scheffler K.
Interferometric, Hybrid, and Weighted B+1 Mapping for Expedited RF Calibration
of Parallel Transmit Ultrahigh-Field MRI, In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ISMRM 2022.
13. Van Damme L, Mauconduit F, Chambrion T,
Boulant N, Gras V. Universal nonselective excitation and refocusing pulses with
improved robustness to off-resonance for Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla
with parallel transmission. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2021;85(2):678-693. doi:10.1002/mrm.28441 SMASH
14. Eichfelder G, Gebhardt M. Local Specific
Absorption Rate Control for Parallel Transmission by Virtual Observation
Points. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011;66(5):1468-1476. doi:10.1002/mrm.22927 SMASH