Leo Marecki1, Suyog Pol1, Robert Zivadinov1,2, and Ferdinand Schweser1,2
1Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology at the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States, 2Center for Biomedical Imaging, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: PET/MR, Preclinical
We developed a retrofitted alignment apparatus that
attaches to the MRI’s motor-driven automated positioning system and enables
simultaneous preclinical PET/MRI at 9.4T with a stand-alone microPET ring. The
system leverages 3D printing technology to achieve stable alignment between the
two modalities, consistent placement of animals, and rapid reconfiguration
between PET-MRI and MRI-only experiments. Thereby addressing the shortcomings
of other retrofitted designs and proving simultaneous PET-MRI capabilities at a
reduced cost.
Introduction
Simultaneous PET and MRI with a retrofitted microPET ring has been demonstrated recently at 9.4 Tesla1-4. These studies employed a simple multi-component alignment apparatus prototype3 to attach the PET ring to the MRI's animal positioning system and hold it inside the magnet (Fig .1). Initial experience with
the prototype2,3 revealed several shortcomings of the
original design: (i) the mechanical connectors did not
provide sufficient stability to hold the apparatus stationary
due to the heavy weight of the equipment, resulting in x-y-position drifting; (ii) the z-location was determined through
laser-calibrating the MRI’s positioning system, but the
reproducibility of the z-positioning was low (mm-range);
(iii) the design involved moving both the RF coil and the
PET ring out of the way for animal positioning, resulting in
high wear and tear and further limiting the z-position
accuracy; (iv) the embedded water heating system did not
reach close enough to the PET ring for efficient heat
transfer.
The present work introduces an improved design that
overcomes the identified limitations of the original holding
apparatus and brings us one
step closer to retrofitting preclinical MRI scanners with PET
capabilities5.Methods
We designed the apparatus to be attached to the motor-driven
automated positioning system (Bruker AutoPac) of a 20 cm horizontal-bore 9.4T
magnet (Bruker Biospin 94/20USR) equipped with a gradient coil with 114 mm
inner diameter (Bruker BGA-12S HP). PET capabilities were provided by a
shielded microPET ring with 44/80 mm inner/outer diameters and 25mm depth
(SynchroPET Inc., Stony Brook, NY; LYSO 18.5x9.6x6 mm3, 4x8 pixels; APD)6.
Several design criteria were identified for the holding apparatus: (i) must
hold a 1H quadrature transceiver coil (Bruker T12969V3; 23/44 mm inner/outer
diameters) with filter box (Fig. 2), isoflurane anesthesia gas outlet, and
vitals monitoring equipment (temperature probe, respiration pillow; ERT Model
1030, SA Instruments, Inc.); (ii) consistent and stable (axial and angle)
placement of the PET ring and volume coil for accurate system attenuation map
reconstruction; (iii) rigid attachment to the automated positioning system for
smooth workflow; (iv) the system and animal can be set up outside the bore; (v)
fine adjustment of x-y-z positioning relative to positioning system; (vi)
positioning of animals without the need to remove the PET ring or RF coil;
(vii) grooves to hold wires, tubes and cables stationary; (viii) adequate
warm-water heating of animal; (ix) flat animal cradle that is easy to
disinfect; (x) MRI-compatible materials; (xi) no deformation due to mechanical
stress. We designed the apparatus in Autodesk Inventor (Autodesk; Professional
2022) and 3D printed components using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS;
Xometry, MD, USA).Results
Figures 3-5 provide an overview of the designed
apparatus. The apparatus was designed as a single piece
(Fig. 3.6) that replaced the original prototype holder as
well as the originally used stock cradle (Fig. 1, green
arrow). The design criteria were met by implementing the
following features: (i) Static molds for the volume coil and
PET ring ensured fixed x, y, and z locations for consistent
placement (Fig. 3.1-3.2, 3.9). (ii) Integrated
space for the filter box close to the coil for length-compressed design (Fig. 3.5). (iii) side grooves for attaching the wires, tubes, and cables (Fig. 3.8). (iv) Anesthesia system track with the anesthesia nose cone on the nose cone track (Fig 3.3-3.4, 3.11). Embedded tracks for
heated water tubes that reach close to RF coil (Fig. 4.1). The attachment of the new
system to the MRI’s positioning system (Fig. 5)
utilized a similar attachment mechanism as the product
animal cradle with a brass nut and bolt system (Fig 4.2-4.3) to
enable stable attachment and easy removal to the ERT module (white). Figure 3 shows the front section of the system fully
assembled with the anesthesia nose cone on the
nose cone track slid out of the volume coil. The
nose cone track rests on the anesthesia system track and
prevents the nose cone from rotating during imaging. The nose cone track possesses nocks that can be imaged though a ZTE scan to orientate the MRI scan to the PET ring (Fig. 3.7). The
system enables setting up the animal outside of the RF coil
and PET-ring assembly on the open space of the cradle. The animal is then slid into the volume coil with the
imaging region centered with respect to both modalities.Discussion
The presented retrofitted alignment apparatus addresses
the weakness of the previously presented design to enable
reproducible preclinical PET-MRI at 9.4T. Reliance on 3D printing technology enabled rapid adjustment of the setup to site-specific needs to facilitate a widespread adoption of preclinical PET-MRI at ultra-high field strength.Conclusion
The proposed apparatus enables retrofitted PET-MRI in preclinical MRI systems. Future research will systematically assess the reproducibility and accuracy of data collection and geometric orientation of the design, as well as the impact of different 3D printing materials on the mechanical stability in a high-throughput environment. The use of 3D printing technology in the development process will enable a rapid improvement of the design when shortcomings are identified. We intend to make the final CAD design publicly available to enable adaption of the retrofitted holding attachment for other MRI systems, facilitating a wider availability of retrofitted PET-MRI.Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was supported by a
research collaboration agreement with SynchroPET Inc.,
Stonybrook, NY, USA and by the National Center for
Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes
of Health under Award Number UL1TR001412. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does
not necessarily represent the official views of SynchroPET,
Inc or the National Institutes of Health.References
1. P. Choudhary et al., "Longitudinal [18F]FDG PET-MRI
at 9.4 Tesla in Twitcher mice using spatial normalization " presented at
the PSMR, 2018.
2. P. Choudhary et al., "Longitudinal Multi-modal
Multi-parametric Imaging of the Twitcher mouse model of Krabbe Disease,"
presented at the PSMR, 2019.
3. Y. Sinelnikov, N. Bertolino, and F. Schweser, "Small
Animal PET Scanner for PET-MRI at Ultra-High Magnetic Fields " presented
at the PSMR, 2016.
4. F. Schweser et al., "Truly simultaneous preclinical
PET-MRI in a 20cm 9.4 Tesla magnet with a retrofitted miniature detector:
Initial results in the twitcher mouse model of Krabbe disease," 2018.
5. F. Nensa, K. Beiderwellen, P. Heusch, and A. Wetter,
"Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future
perspectives," (in eng), Diagn Interv Radiol, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 438-447,
Sep-Oct 2014.
6. S. H. Maramraju et al., "Small animal simultaneous
PET/MRI: initial experiences in a 9.4 T microMRI," (in eng), Physics in
medicine and biology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2459-80, Apr 21, 2011.