Wang Nianhua 1, Yao wang1, and Jiang Xinqing1
1Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Multimodal, Molecular Imaging, MRI Near Infrared Ray
Photodynamic
therapy is a non-invasive and controllable modality with potential as a novel
cancer treatment strategy. However, the ROS production efficiency of PDT is
restricted to hydrophobic characteristics and aggregation caused quenching of
PSs. Herein, we designed a ROS self-activatable polymer (PTKPa) to suppress
photosensitizers ACQ and elevate ROS production capacity. This platform shows
therapeutic outcomes in both cells and orthotopic mouse model, which can
significantly elevate the intracellular ROS level upon 660nm laser irradiation,
induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) to activate antitumor immunity. This work
provides a general strategy enhancing tumor photodynamic therapeutic effects.
Introduction
Cancer
remains a global health concern. Although many therapeutic methods have been
developed for cancer treatment, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and
immunotherapy [1, 2], the clinical therapeutic efficacies are still unsatisfactory. Notably,
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a new cancer therapy strategy in recent years [3]. Compared with
chemotherapy or radiotherapy, PDT is non-invasive, spatiotemporally
controllable, and presents no drug-resistant modality [4]. PDT was a clinically approved minimally invasive therapeutic
procedure when Photosensitizers (PSs) irradiated by an appropriate wavelength
light source to convert oxygen to reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially
singlet oxygen (1O2) can exert a selective cytotoxic
activity causing malignant cells irreversible damage[5,6].However,
the efficiency of ROS production was restricted to the
hydrophobic characteristics and aggregation-caused
quenching (ACQ) of photosensitizers[7].It is urgent to develop novel strategies to overcome these shortages of PSs. Herein,
we developed a ROS self-activatable nano system PTKPa
NPs for controllable release of photosensitizers, amplifying the effect of PDT,
and enhancing antitumor immune responses. Method
As scheme1 dipicted,the photosensitizer pheophorbide
A (Ppa) can be conjugated with polyethylene glycol by 1O2-activatable
poly(thioketal) bond (PTK-SS) to form the amphiphilic PEG-TK-Pa polymer, which
can self-assemble to form PTKPa NPs.We design PSDPa as a contol. The experiments were carried on the synthesized PTKPa and PSDPa to characterize their stability, diameter, ROS-activation and generation capacity, magnetic resonance imaging capability,Ppa cumulative release Then,we employmed a serious experiments on 4T1 cells in vitro, such as MTT,detection of apoptosis, ICD effect (CRT, HMGB1,ATP). And we also validate biodistribution,MRI, analysis tumor growth inhibition on 4T1 tumor-bearing mice model.Result And Discussion
PTKPa NPs(131.9 nm) and PSDPa NPs (137.1 nm )had uniform size distributions, satisfactory dispersibility and stability. PTKPa NPs and PSDPa NPs exhibited similar absorbance to Ppa at 677nm that means Ppa was successfully loaded. Hence,
we presumed that, upon 660nm irradiation, ROS causes degradation of PTKPa NPs
and Ppa release, generating abundant ROS to achieve a ROS self-amplified cycle.The Ppa cumulative release amount of 58.8 % when
PTKPa NPs were exposed to 660 nm , while PSDPa
was 19.6%.We employ the 677nm fluorescence intensity variation
to confirm the binding process between albumin and Ppa,which suggested PTKpa can overcome ACQ effect and improve Ppa's bioavailability. The
UV/Vis absorbance of ABDA indicates that PTKPa NPs possess higher singlet
oxygen generation capacity than PSDPa NPs. We deduced from the above-mentioned
results that a PTKPa NPs can be activated by ROS, accelerate Ppa release and elevate
ROS levels to amplify PDT efficacy in the physiological environment.
The PDT efficiency of
PTKPa NPs or PSDPa NPs was further detected with 1O2
detector 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate, under 660nm laser
irradiation, 4T1 cells incubated with PTKPa NPs exhibited the strongest and
most uniform green fluorescence.Hence, we have verified the capability of PTKPa NPs to elevate intracellular ROS level for causing amplified oxidative stress upon 660nm laser irradiation. The MTT results of PTKPa NPs and 660nm laser treated 4T1 cells' viability dropped from 100% to 13%. While PSDPa
NPs exerted low cell-killing activity (53%), which signified that PTKPa NPs had
higher Ppa-triggered oxidative stress capacity than PSDPa NPs in vitro. The CLSM and FCM demonstrated, upon laser
irradiation, the majority of 4T1 cells pre-treated PTKPa NPs were labeled as
dead cells with a total apoptosis ratio of 77.6%,
higher than PSDPa NPs (51.6%) groups.
The
group of PTKPa NPs combined with 660nm laser had the smallest incremental tumor volume compared to the
initial volume, with
a tumor growth inhibition rate of 86.6 ± 2.8%, and that of PSDPa NPs +
660 nm laser was 61.6 ± 4.1%. In addition, the
most severe morphology variation and tissue necrosis of tumors were observed in
the PTKPa NPs combined 660 nm laser, PSDPa NPs combined 660 nm. Similar results
were obtained after TUNEL staining, the
green fluorescence of CLSM pictures as evidence We then measured the immune cells in 4T1 tumor
bearing mice. The recent studies have shown that PDT can induce ICD by ROS-caused damage at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, which
can recruit dendritic cells (DCs) to tumor tissues and boost dendritic-cell
migration, antigen uptake and maturation in
the tumor-draining lymph nodes [8-11]. Additionally, mature DCs were able to antigen
presentation to T cells, facilitated cytotoxic T
lymphocytes (CTLs) (CD8+ T cells)
activation and responsible for exerting cytocidal effects[3, 12, 13]. Upon laser irradiation, the mice injected with PTKPa NPs, the frequency
of DCs maturation up to 39.2 ± 2.8%, almost 2.0-fold higher than that of the PBS
group.And the frequency of CD8+ T cells in PTKPa NPs increased from 11.5 ± 1.0% to
24.3 ± 0.6% compared to that of the PBS group. In short, results of the current study
illustrate that PTKPa NPs can amplified
oxidative stress and facilitate
ICD for improving photodynamic-immunotherapy efficiency.Conclusion
In summary, we have successfully designed a ROS self-activatable polymer PTKPa, capable of enhancing photodynamic therapeutic effect and regulating the maturation of DCs to elicit a robust immune response.The results of in vivo experiment illustrated that PTKPa induced PDT can suppress the tumor growth evidently and activate immune systems dramatically with an increase in CD8+T cells, mature DCs.In conclusion, this work offers a promising strategy for improving photodynamic-immunotherapy efficacy in cancer therapy. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]. Miller, K.D., et al., Cancer treatment
and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2019.
69(5) 363-385.
[2]. Kennedy, L.B. and A. Salama, A
review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020. 70(2)
86-104.
[3]. Agostinis, P., et al., Photodynamic
therapy of cancer: An update. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2011. 61(4) 250-281.
[4]. Xie, J., et al., Overcoming
barriers in photodynamic therapy harnessing nano-formulation strategies. Chem
Soc Rev, 2021. 50(16) 9152-9201.
[5] Dai-Fukumura-And-Rakesh Dennis E. J. G. J. Dolmans.
Photodynamic therapy for cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2003, 3(5
): 380-387.
[6] Patrizia Agostinis, Berg
Kristian, Cengel Keith-A, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update[J].
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2011, 61(4): 250-281.
[7] Deng K, Yu H, Li J, Li K, Zhao H, Ke M, Huang S, Dual-step irradiation strategy to sequentially destroy singlet oxygen-responsive polymeric micelles and boost photodynamic cancer therapy. Biomaterials 275(2021)120959.
[8]. Castano,
A.P., P. Mroz and M.R. Hamblin, Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity.
Nature Reviews Cancer, 2006. 6(7) 535-545.
[9]. Tanaka,
M., et al., Immunogenic cell death due to a new photodynamic therapy (PDT) with
glycoconjugated chlorin (G-chlorin). Oncotarget, 2016. 7(30) 47242-47251.
[10]. Korbelik,
M., Induction of tumor immunity by photodynamic therapy. J Clin Laser Med Surg,
1996. 14(5) 329-34.
[11]. Obeid,
M., et al., Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell
death. Nature Medicine, 2007. 13(1) 54-61.
[12] Castano, A.P., P. Mroz and M.R. Hamblin,
Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2006.
6(7)535-545.
[13] Li, X., et al., Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2020. 17(11) 657-674.