Siqiang Lv1,2, Zhanguo Sun3, and Xiuzheng Yue4
1Jining Medical University, Jining, China, 2Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, jining, China, 3Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China, 4Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Lung, Data Acquisition, SPLs
Intravoxel
incoherent motion
diffusion-weighted imaging
(IVIM) could obtain parameters of pure water molecule diffusion and
microcirculatory perfusion-related diffusion and more accurately reflects the
complexity of the microstructure of the tumor tissues. Gradient-and-spin echo
(GRASE), incorporating the gradient echo and spin echo techniques, is a
fast-imaging sequence with potential for improved IVIM examinations. The aim of the study was to evaluate
the feasibility and image
quality of the GRASE-IVIM sequence in evaluating solitary
pulmonary lesions (SPLs) by comparing with the EPI-IVIM and TSE-IVIM sequences.
Our data showed GRASE-IVIM sequence could be a fast and stable alternative
technique to evaluate the SPLs.
Introduction
IVIM of solitary pulmonary lesions (SPLs) with EPI or TSE has
been reported to have its own advantages and disadvantages1. While EPI-IVIM
could shorten the scan time, the image quality of which tends to be degenerated
by the presence of artifacts, especially in the lung. Although the image
quality could be improved by the TSE-IVIM, its acquisition times will be
prolonged by using multiple radio frequency (RF) refocusing pulses.
Gradient-and-spin echo (GRASE) imaging, incorporating the gradient echo and
spin echo techniques2, is another fast-imaging sequence with the potential
for improved IVIM examinations. This technique was less prone to magnetic field
inhomogeneity compared with the EPI. The scanning time could be shorten compared
with TSE. Therefore, we hypothesized that the GRASE-IVIM sequence might provide
fewer motion artifacts than EPI-IVIM and a shorter acquisition time than
TSE-IVIM in the examination of SPLs. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate
the clinical feasibility and image quality of
the GRASE-IVIM sequence in evaluating SPLs by comparing them with TSE-IVIM and
EPI-IVIM sequences.Methods
Data acquisition
All MRI
protocols were performed on Philips Ingenia CX 3.0 MRI scanner (Philips
Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with a 16-channel body phase array coil. 54
patients (mean age, 58.95 ± 10.38 years) with SPLs were recruited between February
2021 to March 2022, and 54 SPLs were analyzed (38 malignant and 4 benign). The
study was approved by the IRB of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical
University, and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. The scan protocol
consisted of routine sequences (T1WI, T2WI) and the
IVIM-DWI with TSE, GRASE, and EPI techniques, respectively. The sequence
parameters for the IVIM-DWI protocol were listed in Table 1.
Data
analysis
Signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image distortion ratio (DR) of
TSE-, GRASE-, and EPI-IVIM were calculated. To calculate the SNR and CNR, a
grayscale map with a b-value of 800 s/mm2 was used. Three circular regions of
interest (ROIs) were placed in the lesion, the lung, and the erector spinae
muscle by two independent radiologists with 5 years of experience, respectively.
Regarding the evaluation of distortion, T2WI and IVIM images were
semiautomatically fused with a fusion software on the Intellispace portal
(Version 10.0, Philips Healthcare) in Figure1. The DR was used to
quantitatively compare the image distortions of lesions of three different IVIM
sequences.
To
calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM-derived Parameters,
ROIs were manually drawn on the maximum cross-sections of lesions across three
consecutive slices on the grayscale map with a b-value of 800 s/mm2
by two independent radiologists. It referred to T2WI images, avoiding large
blood vessels, cystic changes, and necrotic components. ROIs were automatically
duplicated and copied to pseudo-color maps of ADC and IVIM-derived parameters
(true diffusion coefficient [D], pseudo-diffusion coefficient [D*],
perfusion fraction [f]) by the workstation.
The
intra- and interobserver agreements were assessed with the interclass
correlation coefficient (ICC). Friedman test was
used to compare the SNR, CNR, and DR of all sequences. Test-retest
reproducibility of ADC and IVIM-derived parameters were
evaluated by using the coefficient of variation
(CV). The 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreements (LoAs) were used to assess the
repeatability of ADC and IVIM parameters derived from all sequences. The p
values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS 25.0 (IBM
Corporation, Armonk, USA) and MedCalc 15.0 (Ostende, Belgium) software
were conducted for
statistical analysis.Results
Compared
with TSE- and GRASE-IVIM, EPI-IVIM had higher SNR, lower CNR, and higher DR (P
< 0.05), but there was no significant difference in SNR, CNR, and DR between
TSE-IVIM and GRASE-IVIM (P>0.05) in Table2
and 3. Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement of ADC and
IVIM-derived parameters of the three sequences. The reproducibility of TSE-IVIM
and GRASE-IVIM parameters of SPLs were excellent for ADC and D, and it was good
for ADC and D value in EPI-IVIM in Table4. Discussion and conclusion
GRASE-IVIM
could reduce the image distortion and improve the test-retest reproducibility
of ADC and D value compared with EPI-IVIM. Although the image quality of
GRASE-IVIM was similar to TSE-IVIM, the acquisition time was obviously shorter
than that of TSE-IVIM in SPLs imaging. Our data showed GRASE-IVIM sequence
could be another fast and stable alternative technique to evaluate the SPLs.
Although further analysis should be conducted to consider the value of
GRASE-IVIM in a large SPLs cohort.Acknowledgements
This
paper is funded by Shandong Medical and Health Science and Technology
Development Program (202009011151)References
1. Wan Q, Lei Q, Wang P, et al. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Lung Cancer: Comparison Between Turbo Spin-Echo
and Echo-Planar Imaging. Journal of computer assisted tomography 2020;44(3):
334-340.
2. Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Inoue T, et al. Magnetic resonance
cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image
quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE? European radiology
2018;28(6): 2436-2443.