Camila Pereira Sousa1,2, Tony Gerges2, Florent Dimeglio1, Jean-Lynce Gnanago2, Valernst Martial Gilmus2, Philippe Lombard2, Hugo Dorez1, Michel Cabrera2, and Simon Auguste Lambert 2
1Hawkcell, Marcy l'étoile, France, 2Université de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, CNRS, Ampère UMR5005, Villeurbanne, France
Synopsis
Keywords: RF Arrays & Systems, RF Arrays & Systems, Animals
In this work, we present a 4-channel receiver
array entirely dedicated to veterinary imaging. For this purpose, we have
fabricated an array coil on a flexible substrate using silver-ink screen
printed process and copper electroplating. This flexible and conformable array
coil has the potential to improve veterinary diagnosis with small form-fitting elements
that allow a better signal to noise ratio performance.
Introduction
Magnetic
resonance imaging is one of the most widely used imaging techniques in the
world. In order to increase image quality and diagnosis accuracy, several
techniques have been developed and improved over time in magnetic resonance such
as magnetic field increasing1, development of flexible phased array coils2
and finally deep learning techniques for processing imaging. However, in
veterinary clinics, imaging techniques still are obsolete with reconditioned
machines and, more recently, array coils at very low field. At high field, the
coils used are the human coils. These coils lack of adaptability to satisfy the
clinical veterinary constraints, resulting in poor image quality and a
diagnosis that may be compromised. In the context of cats and small dogs MRI (under
10kg) , the size of each element of the coil array is oversized and result in
suboptimal signal to noise ratio (SNR) performance in the region of interest. Moreover,
a positioning device require for the animal positioning is not available and results
in poor quality images and an animal positioning different from standard
anatomical conditions. In this
work, we present a 4-element array coils with small channels which allow a better SNR performance at the
region of interest, i.e. here the spine, while preserving the animal in a
comfortable and correct position for diagnosis.Materials and methods
A 4-channel array coil was manufactured using
500µm polycarbonate substrate. A layer of 10 µm of silver
ink Dupont ME603 was deposited using screen-printed process. After cured at
120°C for 20min, a copper thickness was deposited on the array coil using
electroplating as presented in Gerges et al [3].
The MR-coils geometry was a square with 40mm
length and 3mm width and they are separated by a distance of 4mm between each channel.
The inductive decoupling was used for the decoupling between elements when used
in a phased array coil. Fig 01 shows the circuit
diagram of a single element.
3D simulations of an isolated element of the
array were performed using CST Microwave Studio to investigate the effect of
the decoupling ring on the B1- map.
A FR4 substrate was used to contain the active detuning circuit, the matching and
preamplifier decoupling circuit as well as the preamplifier. Active detuning was implemented on each element of the
coil array to allow using the body coil of the MR
scanner for transmission. The Wang et al[4] methods was used to implement the
preamplifier decoupling.
Each element was tested independently and
sequentially on a dedicated RF bench. Measurements
of S-parameters, Q-factors, active detuning and preamplifier decoupling were
performed with a Vector Network Analyze (R&S ZNL3). The loaded and unloaded
quality factor of the coil were measured using the single loop method5 and
a cylindrical phantom filled with
a solution of CuSO4. The active detuning was tested by measuring with
the double probe method6 the difference on S11. The preamplifier
decoupling level was evaluated using double loop methods by comparing the S21 value at f =63.8MHz when the
coil was connected to a low noise preamplifier and then a 50Ω charge (preamplifier noise match impedance).
The MRI experiments are performed using a MR
scanner 1.5T. A 3D gradient echo was performed (TE/TR = 5.6/2.56 , 12° flip
angle, 256x256 matrix , 1mm slice thickness) using a homogeneous cylindrical
phantom.Results
Figure 02 shows a picture of the fabricated MR array
coil. All the coils are
tuned at the Larmor frequency and match to a level bellows -14dB. Mutual
decoupling was measured at least below -18dB for all elements. The preamplifier
decoupling presented at least a 15dB of isolation. The active detuning
generated 40dB of isolation for all the elements. Figure 03 shows the S matrix
of the coil array.
Figure 04 A,B and C shows the images acquired
with a cylindrical phantom in the sagittal, axial and coronal planes
respectively.
Figure 05 A and B show respectively the simulated
B1- map of one element of the array with and without the decoupling ring. The
figure 03 C shows the image obtained with one element. The magnetic field
cancelation observed in simulations are confirmed with the presence of imaging artefacts. Discussions
In this work we presented the design, building
and testing of a 4-channel phased array coil dedicated to veterinary MRI. Nevertheless
this preliminary results showed that the manufacturing process and the
decoupling scheme need to be still optimized.
First, adhesion stress of the ink to the
polycarbonate film was noticed. As a consequence, the adhesion of the copper was damaged,
causing copper cracking and conductivity problems.
The packaging of the tracks and electronics could
improve the robustness of the coil array.
Second, the decoupling ring is used because it
does not depend on the geometry or arrangement of the elements and does not
needs of additional components. However, magnetic field cancelation due to decoupling
ring observed in simulation were also verified in imaging. An optimization of
the inductive ring decoupling will be carried out.
In vivo MRI tests with dogs and cats will be
carried out in the future.
In conclusion, this flexible and conformable
array coil could improve veterinary diagnosis with small form-fitting
elements that allow a better signal to noise ratio performance. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Wiesinger, F., Van de Moortele, P.-F., Adriany, G., De Zanche, N.,
Ugurbil, K. and Pruessmann, K.P. (2006), Potential and feasibility of parallel
MRI at high field. NMR Biomed., 19: 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1050
[2] P. B. Roemer, W. A. Edelstein, C. E. Hayes, S. P. Souza, et O. M.
Mueller, « The NMR phased array », Magn Reson Med, vol. 16, nᵒ 2, p.
192‑225, nov. 1990, doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910160203.
[3] T. Gerges, V. Semet, P. Lombard, S. Gaillard, M. Cabrera, et S. A.
Lambert, « 3D Plastronics for Smartly Integrated Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Coils », Front. Phys., vol. 8, p. 240, juill. 2020, doi:
10.3389/fphy.2020.00240.
[4] W. Wang, V. Zhurbenko, J. D. Sánchez‐Heredia, et J. H.
Ardenkjær‐Larsen, « Three‐element matching networks for receive‐only MRI
coil decoupling », Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 85, nᵒ 1, p. 544‑550, janv. 2021, doi: 10.1002/mrm.28416.
[5] J.-C. Ginefri, E. Durand, et L. Darrasse, «
Quick measurement of nuclear magnetic resonance coil sensitivity with a
single-loop probe », Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 70, nᵒ 12, p. 4730‑4731, déc. 1999, doi:
10.1063/1.1150142.
[6]Darrasse L, Kassab G. Quick measurement of NMR-coil sensitivity with a dual-loop probe. Rev Sci Instrum. 1993; 64: 1841–1844.