Yunkun Zhao1 and Xiaoliang Zhang1
1Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: High-Field MRI, Non-Array RF Coils, Antennas & Waveguides
This study investigates the effect of
conductor width of the RF coils to the EM coupling of an array. The results
show that the wide conductor of the RF coils offers less EM coupling among
resonant elements.
Introduction
A significant challenge in the design
of the RF receiver or transceiver arrays is the electromagnetic (EM) coupling
between RF coil elements of an array [1]. The EM coupling between array
elements is complicated and is related to many factors, including array layout,
coil geometry, coil material, and the resonant frequency. In this work, we
investigate how the coil conductor geometry or width influences the decoupling
performance. Methods
The
coil array we used for investigation is designed on a 2-dimensional plane, as
shown in Fig.1. The conductor used for the circuit construction is a copper
tape assigned the exact specification with annealed copper. The size of the LC
circuit coil is 8×8 cm2, including two tuning capacitors, and has been tuned to
have a 300MHz resonant frequency. Two coils in the array are identical, but
only one has a power supply and matching circuit, which include two matching
capacitors. As shown in Fig. 2, the width of the copper tape changes from 5mm
to 30mm during the research and the width of the coil and the gap between coils
remain unchanged. The value of the tuning capacitor and matching capacitor will
also change to remain at the resonant frequency of the single coil at 300MHz.
Numerical results of the proposed designs are obtained using electromagnetic
simulation software CST Studio Suite (Dassault Systèmes, Paris, France).
Because of the principle of inductive coupling, two resonant frequencies will
appear on the scattering parameters after the simulation. The performance of
the coil array in coupling was evaluated by scattering parameters and the
coupling coefficient of resonators which were calculated from two resonant
frequencies after coupling. The definition of the coupling coefficient of two
coupled resonators is k = (fo2-fe2)/(fo2+fe2), k is the coupling coefficient, fo is the first resonant
frequency, and fe is the
second resonant frequency [2]. Results
Fig.3 shows the
scattering parameters for the 10mm copper tape width case as an example of
scattering parameters after inductive coupling. Fig.4 shows the coupling
coefficient of resonators versus the width of the copper tape result. The
coupling coefficient shows that while the width of the copper tape increases,
the coupling strength between coils will decrease. The relationship between the
coupling coefficient and the copper tape width can be approximated as function: f(x) = 0.1002+0.005381×cos(0.04304x)+0.07985×sin(0.04304x).
The reason for this phenomenon is that even though increasing the copper tape
width will reduce the inductance of the coil, and the copper tape will block
the flow of the magnetic flux. Because magnetic flux closer to the coil is
always stronger, the increasing width of copper tape blocks the flow of
magnetic flux and reduces the induced electromotive force. Therefore, the
coupling strength between two coils also decreases. Conclusion
This study
investigates the relationship between conductor width and coupling coefficient.
The results show that EM decoupling improves with the increase in width of the
coil conductor in the case of loop type coils. This result may lead to
potential decoupling techniques using resonators.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by the NIH under a BRP grant
U01 EB023829 and by State University of New York (SUNY) under SUNY Empire
Innovation Professorship Award.References
1. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller
OM. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med. 1990 Nov;16(2):192-225. doi:
10.1002/mrm.1910160203. PMID: 2266841.
2. Tyurnev V V, Belyaev B A. Interaction of parallel microstrip
resonators[J]. Elektronnaya tekhnika. Ser. Elektronika SVCh, 1990 (4): 25-30.