Zyad M. Almutlaq1,2, Sarah E. Bacon3, Daniel J. Wilson3, Nisha Sharma4, and David L. Buckley1
1Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Keywords: Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques, DSC & DCE Perfusion, IVIM
DCE-MRI can provide
quantitative estimates of perfusion-related parameters in tumors, such as blood
flow and blood volume fraction. It has also been proposed that IVIM MRI can be
used to characterize perfusion in addition to microstructure. This proposal
remains controversial and requires further investigation. In this study, we
investigate the relationship between perfusion-related parameters measured by
IVIM and DCE-MRI in a cohort of patients with breast cancer imaged before and
after one and two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Introduction
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI has a key role in the response
monitoring of patients with breast cancer to treatment with neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (NACT)1. DCE-MRI enables estimation
of perfusion-related parameters of breast tumors, including blood flow (Fb) and
blood volume fraction (vb)2. An alternative technique
proposed to probe tumor perfusion is intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)3. It has been suggested that
IVIM enables simultaneous assessment of tissue diffusion (Dt), pseudo-diffusion
(Dp), perfusion fraction (f), and blood flow (f×Dp)4. However, previous studies
that have explored the relationships between perfusion-related parameters
measured by IVIM and DCE-MRI in a range of tumors have produced contradictory
results5. The biophysical
interpretation of the IVIM parameters f and f×Dp and their relationship to the
DCE parameters Fb and vb remain controversial and require further
investigation. This study aims to
assess the correlations between these parameters in a cohort of patients with
breast cancer imaged before and after one and two cycles of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy.Methods
The study comprised 40 patients with primary breast cancer (mean age 46, range 25-69)
due to undergo NACT.
Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI scanner (Aera; Siemens) before treatment,
following one and three cycles of NACT. The scanning sequences included DWI with
6 b-values (0, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 s/mm2), a 3D IR-prepared spoiled
gradient echo sequence to estimate T1 values (pre-and post-contrast) and
interleaved high spatial and high temporal resolution (HSR and HTR , 2 s per volume) 3D spoiled
gradient echo DCE sequences for tumor delineation and tracer kinetic analysis,
respectively6,7. In addition
to a 16-channel breast coil, a flexible array coil placed on the back was used
to increase the signal from the descending aorta to enable accurate measurement
of the arterial input function (AIF)8. Gd-DOTA was administered (0.1
mmol/kg) followed by saline (20 ml) at a rate of 3 ml/s.
All MRI data were processed via in-house programs developed
in MATLAB (Mathworks, USA). The DWI images (including ADC maps) were aligned to the corresponding HTR
images and HTR and HSR subtraction images were generated. For each
patient, a whole-volume region of interest (ROI) was generated using a 3D
seeded region growing algorithm based on the threshold signal intensity (SI) of
enhancing tumor in the HSR subtraction images. To reduce the possibility of
tumor heterogeneity compromising the analysis, two sub-ROIs (5×5 pixels) of the
whole-volume ROI were generated; the region with the lowest values on the ADC
map (cold-spot ROI) and the region with the highest SI on the HTR subtraction
(hot-spot ROI). All 3 ROIs were copied to the corresponding DWI, ADC, IR and
HTR images.
For DCE, these three ROIs were used to generate SI-time
curves from the HTR images and estimate T1 relaxation-times from the IR data.
Further ROIs were drawn in the descending aorta for generating SI-time curves
and estimating T1 before and after Gd-DOTA administration for AIF calculation8. SI-time data
were converted to Gd-DOTA concentration-time using a bookend T1 correction8,9. A
two-compartment exchange model was fitted to the DCE data and Fb, vb, capillary
permeability-surface area product (PS) and extracellular-extravascular volume fraction (ve) were estimated10.
For
DWI, the mean SI for each b‑value
was extracted from the three tumor ROIs and fitted using a monoexponential and
an IVIM model. The IVIM parameters were estimated using an over-segmented
approach (estimating Dt and f from the high b-value data, then fixing Dt and f
and estimating Dp)11. A
Spearman rank test was used to assess the correlation between the diffusion and
DCE parameters.Results
When data from all 3 visits were combined there
were moderate positive correlations between the diffusion parameters ADC &
Dt and the DCE parameter ve estimated in whole-tumor ROIs (r = 0.493 and 0.505
for ADC & Dt, respectively; n = 74, P<0.001) (Figure 1). However, there
were no significant correlations between the IVIM parameters f & f×Dp and
the DCE parameters Fb & vb. Significant correlations between these
parameters were only seen in selected subsets of the combined data (e.g., a moderate
correlation between f and Fb following cycle 1 in hot-spot ROIs; r = 0.559, n =
32, P = 0.001, Figure 2). This correlation was not maintained across other
tumor ROIs or treatment time-pointsDiscussion and conclusion
Our findings of the moderate correlations
between the diffusion parameters (ADC, Dt) and ve suggest that water diffusion
increases as the interstitial fluid volume increases, an expected
characteristic of the diffusion signal but one that has been challenged12. However,
our data did not identify any consistent correlations between perfusion
parameters estimated by IVIM and DCE. We recognize that the precision with which parameters such as vb and f×Dp are estimated is poor but estimates of f and Fb are more precise and our data support the suggestion that a single diffusion coefficient may not reflect the complex diffusion properties of the vascular signal13.Acknowledgements
The study was funded by Breast Cancer Now (award
2014MayPR241).References
1. Shenoy H, Peter M, Masannat Y, Dall B, Dodwell D, Horgan KJSO (2009) Practical advice on clinical decision making during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Surgical Oncology 1:65-71
2. Georgiou L, Sharma N, Broadbent DA et al (2018) Estimating breast tumor blood flow during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using interleaved high temporal and high spatial resolution MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 79:317-326
3. Iima M, Honda M, Sigmund EE, Ohno Kishimoto A, Kataoka M, Togashi K (2020) Diffusion MRI of the breast: Current status and future directions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 52:70-90
4. Le Bihan D, Turner R (1992) The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 27:171-178
5. Federau C (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI as a means to measure in vivo perfusion: A review of the evidence. NMR in Biomedicine 30:e3780
6. Stevens W, Farrow IM, Georgiou L et al (2021) Breast tumour volume and blood flow measured by MRI after one cycle of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy as predictors of pathological response. The British journal of radiology 94:20201396
7. Almutlaq ZM, Wilson DJ, Bacon SE et al (2022) Evaluation of monoexponential, stretched‐exponential and intravoxel incoherent motion MRI diffusion models in early response monitoring to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer—A preliminary study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 56:1079-1088
8. Georgiou L, Wilson DJ, Sharma N, Perren TJ, Buckley DL (2019) A functional form for a representative individual arterial input function measured from a population using high temporal resolution DCE MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81:1955-1963
9. Cron GO, Santyr G, Kelcz F (1999) Accurate and rapid quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MR imaging using spoiled gradient‐recalled echoes and bookend T1 measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42:746-753
10. Sourbron S, Buckley DL (2011) Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability. Physics in Medicine and Biology 57:R1
11. Suo S, Lin N, Wang H et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: comparison of different curve‐fitting methods. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 42:362-370
12. Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Rahman AR et al (2011) On the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and extravascular extracellular volume fraction in human breast cancer. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 29:630-638
13. Zhang X, Ingo C, Teeuwisse WM, Chen Z, van Osch MJ (2018) Comparison of perfusion signal acquired by arterial spin labeling–prepared intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI and conventional IVIM MRI to unravel the origin of the IVIM signal. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 79:723-729