4120

Multiparametric MRI for Staging of Bowel Inflammatory Activity in Crohn's Disease with IVIM and DCE-MRI: A Preliminary Study
Jianguo Zhu1, Liangqiang Mao1, Yan Li1, Weiqiang Dou2, and Dmytro Pylypenko2
1Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 2MR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China

Synopsis

Keywords: Digestive, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques

In summary, our findings suggested that the combination of IVIM and DCE-MRI can be used to accurately stage CD lesions activity. However, we must acknowledge that further investigation area is warranted to validate this preliminary finding.

Background:

In Crohn's disease (CD) clinical practice, an accurate staging of inflammatory activity is more importantant than detecting lesions, as clinical management decision and efficacy evaluation are dependent on activity stage.

Purpose:

To investigate if the combination of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is feasible for staging CD activity.

Study Type:

Retrospective.

Population:

A total of 65 CD patients (45 men and 20 women; age range 18~65 years, median age 29.78 years) were enrolled and analyzed.

Field Strength/Sequence:

A 3.0-T, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, IVIM (multiplexed sensitivity encoding, MUSE), DCE images.

Assessment:

The simplified endoscopic score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) and magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) were used as the reference. The severity and extent of bowel lesions were evaluated by a gastroenterologist using standard colonoscopy. A senior radiologist scored the ileocolic lesions using the MaRIA scoring system. The IVIM and DCE-MRI data were processed by two junior radiologists, who were blinded to the SES-CD and MaRIA scores. Finally, three IVIM parameters: fast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCfast), slow apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCslow), and the fractional perfusion (Fraction of ADCfast), as well as four DCE-MRI parameters: volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) and plasma volume fraction (Vp) were generated.

Statistical Tests:

Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U), logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Delong test, and Spearman's correlation test were performed.

Results:

According to SES-CD, 116 ileocolonic segments with CD lesions were indentified as: inactive (n = 38), mild (n = 46), and moderate to severe (n = 32). Inter-reader agreement has been validated with high ICC coefficients > 0.9 for all IVIM and DCE-MRI parameters. Relative to the two active groups, MaRIA (6, p < 0.001), ADCfast (8.68 ×10-3 mm2/s, p < 0.001), Ktrans (0.95 min-1, p < 0.001), Kep (1.14 min-1, p < 0.001) and Ve (0.79, p < 0.001) all showed lower values in inactive group. Fraction of ADCfast (38.8%, p < 0.001) was higher in inactive than the other two groups. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, ADCfast (p < 0.001), Fraction of ADCfast (p = 0.005), Ktrans (p < 0.001) and Kep (p = 0.003) were identified as significant factors for differentiating among the three groups. Significantly different parameters were revealed between inactive and active groups, including MaRIA score (6 vs. 12.5, p < 0.001), ADCfast (8.68×10-3 mm2/s vs. 11.89×10-3 mm2/s, p < 0.001), Fraction of ADCfast (38.80% vs. 25.63%, p < 0.001), Ktrans (0.95 min-1 vs. 1.82 min-1, p < 0.001), Kep (1.14 min-1 vs. 1.64 min-1, p < 0.001) and Ve (0.79 vs. 0.87, p = 0.011). Binary logistic analyses identified ADCfast (Odds Ratio = 2.009, p = 0.001), Ktrans (Odds Ratio = 54.771, p = 0.014) and Kep (Odds Ratio = 6.105, p = 0.029) as independent predictors for the active status. The combination of ADCfast, Ktrans and Kep performed better than MaRIA score (p = 0.028), for differentiating inactive and active status. MaRIA score was positively correlated with ADCfast (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), Ktrans (r = 0.581, p < 0.001), Kep (r = 0.443, p < 0.001) and Ve (r = 0.294, p = 0.001), however, negatively correlated with Fraction of ADCfast (r = -0.394, p < 0.001).

Data Conclusion:

The combination of IVIM and DCE-MRI can be used to accurately stage inflammatory activity in CD.

Acknowledgements

The research project was supported by the “Six One Projects” Top-notch Talent Research Project for High-level Health Talents in Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. LGY2018072).

References

1. Roda G, Chien Ng S, Kotze PG, et al. Crohn's disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6(1):22.

2. Cushing K, Higgins PDR. Management of Crohn Disease: A Review. JAMA 2021;325(1):69-80.

3. Bharadwaj S, Narula N, Tandon P, Yaghoobi M. Role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2018;6(2):75-82.

4. Chatterji M, Fidler JL, Taylor SA, Anupindi SA, Yeh BM, Guglielmo FF. State of the Art MR Enterography Technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2021;30(1):3-11.

5. Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn's disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(8):1759-1768.

6. Somwaru AS, Khanijow V, Katabathina VS. Magnetic resonance enterography, colonoscopy, and fecal calprotectin correlate in colonic Crohn's disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19(1):210.

7. Lee S, Choi YH, Cho YJ, et al. Quantitative evaluation of Crohn's disease using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in children and young adults. Eur Radiol 2020;30(6):3168-3177.

8. Zhu J, Zhang F, Luan Y, et al. Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and Diffusion-Weighted MRI (DW-MRI) Evaluate Inflammation Disease: A Preliminary Study of Crohn's Disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(14): e3239.

9. Zhu J, Zhang F, Zhou J, Li H. Assessment of therapeutic response in Crohn's disease using quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters: A preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(32): e7759.

10. Bhatnagar G, Dikaios N, Prezzi D, Vega R, Halligan S, Taylor SA. Changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced pharmacokinetic and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters reflect response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease. Br J Radiol 2015;88(1055):20150547.

11. Federau C. Measuring Perfusion: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021;29(2):233-242.

12. Freiman M, Perez-Rossello JM, Callahan MJ, et al. Characterization of fast and slow diffusion from diffusion-weighted MRI of pediatric Crohn's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37(1):156-163.

13. Le Bihan D. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 2008;249(3):748-752.

14. Hectors SJ, Gordic S, Semaan S, et al. Diffusion and perfusion MRI quantification in ileal Crohn's disease. European radiology 2019;29(2):993-1002.

15. Lefrancois P, Zummo-Soucy M, Olivie D, et al. Diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of anal fistula activity. PLoS One 2018;13(1): e0191822.

16. Qin J, Li J, Yang H, et al. Values of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in evaluating the activity of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis of rat model. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 68:30-35.

17. Zou L, Jiang J, Zhang H, et al. Comparing and combining MRE, T1rho, SWI, IVIM, and DCE-MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis in rabbits: Assessment of a predictive model based on multiparametric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2022;87(5):2424-2435.

18. Andrade AR, da Rocha TRF, Ortiz-Agostinho CL, et al. Endoscopic activity, tissue factor and Crohn's disease: findings in clinical remission patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820939412.

19. Roseira J, Ventosa AR, de Sousa HT, Brito J. The new simplified MARIA score applies beyond clinical trials: A suitable clinical practice tool for Crohn's disease that parallels a simple endoscopic index and fecal calprotectin. United European Gastroenterol J 2020;8(10):1208-1216.

20. Weiss B, Turner D, Griffiths A, et al. Simple Endoscopic Score of Crohn Disease and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Children: Report from ImageKids Study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019;69(4):461-465.

21. Yang X, Xiao X, Lu B, Chen Y, Wen Z, Yu S. Perfusion-sensitive parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in rectal cancer: evaluation of reproducibility and correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Acta Radiol 2019;60(5):569-577.

22. Sun H, Xu Y, Xu Q, et al. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer. Acad Radiol 2019;26(7): e134-e140.

23. Rozendorn N, Amitai MM, Eliakim RA, Kopylov U, Klang E. A review of magnetic resonance enterography-based indices for quantification of Crohn's disease inflammation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756284818765956.

24. D'Amico F, Chateau T, Laurent V, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Which MRI Score and Technique Should Be Used for Assessing Crohn's Disease Activity? J Clin Med 2020;9(6).

25. Zhang MC, Li XH, Huang SY, et al. IVIM with fractional perfusion as a novel biomarker for detecting and grading intestinal fibrosis in Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol 2019;29(6):3069-3078.

26. Wu YC, Xiao ZB, Lin XH, Zheng XY, Cao DR, Zhang ZS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the activity staging of terminal ileum Crohn's disease. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26(39):6057-6073.

27. Vieujean S, Coibion C, Seidel L, Louis E, Meunier P. Magnetic resonance enterography perfusion parameters reveal complex changes in affected and unaffected segments in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020;55(9):1041-1048.

28. Baxter GC, Patterson AJ, Woitek R, Allajbeu I, Graves MJ, Gilbert F. Improving the image quality of DWI in breast cancer: comparison of multi-shot DWI using multiplexed sensitivity encoding to conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI. Br J Radiol 2021;94(1119):20200427.

29. Oto A, Kayhan A, Williams JT, et al. Active Crohn's disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33(3):615-624.

30. Eder P, Lykowska-Szuber L, Iwanik K, et al. The influence of anti-TNF therapy on CD31 and VEGF expression in colonic mucosa of Crohn's disease patients in relation to mucosal healing. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2016;54(2):75-80.

31. Song XL, Wang L, Ren H, Wei R, Ren JL, Niu J. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Differentiation Borderline from Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumors: Correlation with Histological Cell Proliferation and Vessel Characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;51(3):928-935.

32. Deban L, Correale C, Vetrano S, Malesci A, Danese S. Multiple pathogenic roles of microvasculature in inflammatory bowel disease: a Jack of all trades. Am J Pathol 2008;172(6):1457-1466.

Figures

Figure 1. An exampled 34-year-old female patient with CD. T2-weighted image (A) shows focal thickening and hyperintensity wall with a deep ulcer in the descending colon with MaRIA score 17.5 and SES-CD score 7. A region of interest (ROI) for IVIM and DCE-MRI data measurement is placed in the thickest area of the intestinal lesion (yellow arrow). Figures B~I show IVIM image (B), DCE-MRI image (F) and the pseudo-color images of parameters: ADCslow (C), ADCfast (D), Fraction of ADCfast (E), Ktran (G), Kep (H), and Ve (I).

Figure 2. ROC curve for assessing diagnostic performance in distinguishing between inactive and active groups. Note: ROC = receiver operating characteristic analysis; AUC = area under the ROC curve; Combination of parameters = combination of ADCfast , Ktrans and Kep Combination of parameters performs better than MaRIA (AUC: 0.974 vs. 0.902, p = 0.028).

Figure 3. The relationships between the MaRIA score and quantitative parameters. Note: f = Fraction of ADCfast MaRIA score is positively correlated with ADCfast (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), Ktrans (r = 0.581, p < 0.001), Kep (r = 0.443, p < 0.001) and Ve (r = 0.294, p = 0.001), however, negatively correlated with Fraction of ADCfast (r = -0.394, p < 0.001). There is no statistical correlation between MaRIA score and Vp (p = 0.552).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 31 (2023)
4120
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/4120