Giovanni Costa1, Margarethus Maarten Paulides1, and Irena Zivkovic1
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Synopsis
Keywords: High-Field MRI, High-Field MRI, RF arrays, transcieve coils, SCC coil
The
recently proposed shielded-coaxial-cable (SCC) coils are intrinsically highly
decoupled elements. Their suitability in multichannel transceiver arrays at
ultra-high field was successfully demonstrated in 7T arrays. In this work, we
investigated the single element and array properties of SCC coils at 9.4T. We
simulated the SCC element and compared its properties (
B1+, SAR) with those of
a conventional loop coil. Subsequently, we fabricated eight SCC coils and
investigated their coupling properties when placed in various configurations. SCCs at 400MHz provided similar
B1+ and SAR efficiency, but
generated ~25% less SAR
10g,max . SCC performed well in different array configurations.
Introduction
The design of multichannel
arrays for operation at ultra-high field is challenging due to several aspects: interelement coupling
must be low, efficiency must be high and the energy deposition should be low1,2. Recently, the shielded-coaxial-cable (SCC) coil was proven to be a suitable
array element for 7T MRI3,4 (300MHz) due its flexibility, and low
interelement coupling properties. When placed in an array configuration, the
SCC coil showed a low sensitivity to various amount of overlap, bending and
elongation4 at 300MHz. In this work, we investigate the use of SCC
elements in multichannel flexible arrays for applications at 9.4T human MRI
(400MHz).Methods
Eight
identical SCC coils for operation at 400MHz were fabricated using a RG316
coaxial cable (2.45mm diameter). For SCC fabrication, we started from the
design proposed for 7T imaging4 (300MHz). We tuned the resonant peak
at 400MHz by shortening the cable length, and we matched the coils using two
33pF series capacitances and a 24pF parallel capacitance. The resulting coil
diameter was ~9cm when full-opened (round coil), ~6.5cm when at rest
(elongated). The SCC coils were placed on a cylindrical phantom (εr=60,
σ=0.6 S/m, phantom diameter=18 cm), in a tight fit configuration (~7cm
diameter per coil) and the distance between coils and phantom was 12mm.
S-parameter
measurements of the coils in various array configurations were performed using
a VNA (N9914A FieldFox 6.5 GHz RF Analyzer). The array
configurations were: (i) 2-coil array for different amount of overlap and
distance between the elements (ii) 4-coil array in a 2x2 configuration, with adjacent
coils (iii) full 8-element configuration around the phantom, with adjacent coils
(figure 2). In all the configurations, the cables were routed to minimize
coupling.
We
also compared SCC and conventional loop coils using simulations (CST Microwave
Studio, Darmstadt, Germany). The SCC coil was modeled as coaxial cable RG316
(2.45mm diameter, Figure 1).Results
Figure 2
compares the results for the B1+ field maps and transmit efficiency of SCC and
conventional coils.
Figure 3 shows the results for the SAR10g,max and SAR efficiency. The SAR10g,max was 1.91 W/kg for an SCC and 2.54 W/kg for a conventional loop.
Figure 4 shows results of
the measured S-parameters of different SCC array configurations on a
cylindrical phantom. At any examined configuration – except when coils were 50%
overlapped - The S11 and S21 parameters were below -10dB (S21< -15dB on
average).Discussion
As
expected, the SCC coils designed for operation at 9.4T were of smaller diameter
(
~9cm diameter max aperture) than SCC coils designed for operation at 7T ( ~12.5cm
diameter max aperture).
While
there were no significant differences in the B1+ field maps, in the transmit
efficiency, and in the SAR efficiency, the SAR10g,max was ~25% higher in the loop
case, and also the SAR field maps revealed higher energy deposition for loops.
In array configurations, the fabricated
SCC coils showed low interelement coupling when slightly overlapped, or next to
each other. However, coupling was
high in a 50% overlapped configuration. This effect was not observed in
simulations – in which the PCB used to solder the tuning and matching circuit
was not modelled - or at 300MHz. Conclusions
In
this study, we show that SCCs at 400MHz provide equal performance than
capacitive segmented loops in terms of transmit efficiency, B1+ field maps and
SAR efficiency, but generate ~25% less SAR10g,max . Measurements of the S-matrix reveal that the SCC are versatile elements, since
the same design performs well in a large variety of array configurations.
The observed decoupling properties of the coil make it suitable for use in
tight fit array configurations. One of the intended applications will be c-spine spinal cord imaging
at 9.4T - at the moment, there is no dedicated coil for this region5. SCC coil is also a suitable candidate for densely populated receive arrays at
9.4T. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. P.B.
Roemer et al. , “The NMR phased array”, in Magn. Reson. Med. (1990) 16:192–225.
2. Nikolai
I. Avdievich et al. , “Decoupling of a double‐row 16‐element tight‐fit transceiver phased array for human whole‐brain imaging at 9.4 T”, NMR in Biomedicine. 2018;31:e3964
3. T. Ruytenberg et al., “A flexible five-channel shielded-coaxial-cable
(SCC) transceive neck coil for high-resolution carotid imaging at 7T”, Magn. Reson. Med. (2020); 84:1672–1677
4. T. Ruytenberg et al., “Shielded-coaxial-cable Coils as Receive and
ransceive Array Elements for 7T Human MRI.” Magn. Reson. Med. (2019)
83(3):1135–46.
5. O. Geldschläger et al.
, “Ultrahigh-resolution quantitative spinal cord MRI at 9.4T”, Magn.
Reson. Med. (2021); 85: 1013-1027