Michael Carl1, Rafi Brada2, Nir Mazor2, Daniel V Litwiller3, and Maggie Fung4
1GE Healthcare, San Diego, CA, United States, 2GE Research, Herzliya, Israel, 3GE Healthcare, Denver, CO, United States, 4GE Healthcare, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
In this work we use
variable-density prospective undersampling of the phase-encode k-space lines
(ky) in 2D fast spin-echo (2DFSE) followed by deep learning (DL)
reconstruction. We were able to achieve an acceleration of R=4 while
maintaining high image quality.
Introduction:
Two-dimensional fast
spin echo (2DFSE) is one of the main clinical MR sequences used in musculoskeletal
(MSK) imaging. High resolution imaging is important in this application due the
small structures in most joint structures, which can lead to long scan-times
and potential motion artifacts. In this work we use variable-density
prospective undersampling [1] of the phase-encode k-space lines (ky) followed by
deep learning (DL) reconstruction. We were able to achieve an acceleration of
R=4 while maintaining high image quality. Phantom experiments and in-vivo scans
were performed to study different undersampling patterns and their performance
in terms of aliasing artifacts and resolution. Materials and Methods:
The prospective
undersampling schedule was determined by a parameterized probability density
function (PDF) given by:
PDF(ky) = [ (1 - |1 - |ky| |)/(nkfull/2) ]vd [1]
where nkfull is the
number fully acquired ky lines (e.g. without acceleration), and vd is a tuning parameter
that alters the shape of the PDF (see Fig.1). In addition to the undersampled
outer regions, the center portion of k-space is fully sample similar to
standard ARC acceleration. For our experiments presented in this work, we kept
the number of central lines at 12-24.
Using this probability
function, the desired amount acquired k-space lines (nacq) in the outer region
of k-space is sampled from the PDF. Fig.1 shows
some representative PDFs using several values of vd and a central region of 12
k-space lines and acceleration factor of 4. For lower values of vd the PDF
becomes nearly flat (Fig.1a), resulting in a uniform undersampling similar to
standard ARC. As the value of vd increases, the center region becomes more
fully sampled (Fig1.c,d), while the outer region becomes more sparsely sampled.
This results in better aliasing suppression for higher values of vd at the
expense of loss of resolution due to the lack of outer k-space samples.
High-resolution ACR phantom
experiments were performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner (GE Healthcare,
Waukesha, WI) to optimize the PDF parameters. Additionally, we performed
in-vivo scanning of the knee to test the sequence performance in clinical settings. All DL inferencing was performed on a dedicated server after
MR imaging.Results:
Several phantom images are shown in Fig.2 with and
acceleration factor of 4, shown at different values of vd = [0.01, 1, 2, 3],
corresponding to the PDFs shown in Fig.1. Both full FOV images are shown to investigate
aliasing patterns, as well as a zoomed-in region to study the resolution
performance. As expected, the images using a lower value of vd result in
notable aliasing, but result in the sharpest resolution (Fig.2a), while Fig.2d
(vd=3) shows little to no aliasing but has some noticeable blurring.
The in-vivo knee images
are shown in Fig.3. Shown are coronal 2D FSE images with standard ARC=2 (left),
and DL variable density with undersampling factor=4 and vd=2. The overall image
quality appears similar with only minor blurring apparent in the DL image.Conclusion:
We have investigated a
variable density undersampling scheme to accelerate clinical fast-spin-echo MR
imaging in MSK. We found that an acceleration factors up to 4 can give
promising IQ, and result in diagnostic images while at the same time reducing the
scan times by several factors.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Sparse
MRI: The Application of Compressed Sensing for Rapid MR Imaging, Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 58:1182–1195 (2007)