Koen P.A. Baas1, Chau Vu2, Jian Shen2, Bram F. Coolen3, Gustav J. Strijkers3, John C. Wood2,4, and Aart J. Nederveen1
1Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Oxygenation, Oxygenation
TRUST and T2-TRIR can be used to measure venous blood oxygenation (Y
v)
and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). T2-TRIR also offers simultaneous blood T1
(T1
b) measurements for hematocrit calculation in lieu of invasive
blood samples. Here, TRUST and T2-TRIR were compared across a broad Y
v
range using hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges in healthy volunteers, while T2-TRIR-derived
hematocrit estimates were compared with venipuncture results. T2-TRIR- and
TRUST-derived Y
v and OEF values exhibited a small constant bias (-5.4±3.5% and 6.0±4.0% respectively, both p<0.01) across all stimuli. Hematocrit
by venipuncture and from T1
b were unbiased but had broad confidence intervals
(1.7±6.3%, p=0.20).
Introduction
Venous blood oxygenation (Yv) can be derived from venous blood T2 (T2b). Yv measurements enable the estimation of oxygen-extraction fraction (OEF) and, combined with cerebral blood flow, the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2).1 These biomarkers reflect cerebral oxygen metabolism and are thought to be indicative of tissue viability. T2-Prepared-Blood-Relaxation-Imaging-with-Inversion-Recovery (T2-TRIR) was introduced as an alternative to T2-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging (TRUST) to simultaneously measure T2b and T1b.2 T1b enables hematocrit (Hct) estimation in lieu of invasive blood samples. We previously demonstrated that TRUST and T2-TRIR were equally reproducible, but T2-TRIR-derived T2b values were significantly higher compared to TRUST.3 Here, we further investigated this bias over a broader O2 saturation range using hypoxic and hypercapnic gas challenges in healthy volunteers and validated T2-TRIR-derived Hct estimates versus venipuncture.Methods
Twelve healthy volunteers (4F:8M, age 36±10 years) were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva
system. The scan protocol included five respiratory phases: baseline (room air),
mild hypoxia, severe hypoxia, hypercapnia, and recovery (room air) which were performed
using a computer-controlled gas blender (RespirAct, Thornhill Research,
Toronto, Canada). During mild and severe hypoxia, end-tidal pO2 (EtO2)
was targeted at 55 mmHg and 40 mmHg respectively. During hypercapnia, baseline end-tidal
pCO2 (EtCO2) was increased by 10 mmHg. Fingertip pulse
oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral tissue oxygenation index (TOI) were
recorded during the whole measurement. During each phase, TRUST and
T2-TRIR scans at the superior sagittal sinus and a phase contrast (PC) scan
above the bifurcation of the carotid arteries were acquired. TRUST and T2-TRIR
scans were acquired as reported previously using effective echo times of 0, 40,
80, and 160ms.3 Complete blood count was measured by
venipuncture.
For TRUST data, label and control images were subtracted and the
difference signal was fitted to obtain T2b.4 For
T2-TRIR data, a dedicated voxel-selection strategy was used, as described
previously.3 T1b and T2b were simultaneously
fitted using the following model:
$$S=M_0\times\left[(1-(e^{-\frac{eTE}{T2_b}}\times IE))\times e^{-\frac{TI}{T1_b}}\right]$$
From the TRUST- and
T2-TRIR-derived T2b values, Yv was calculated using an
empirically derived model5:
$$R_2=77.5\times Hct\times(1-Yv)^{2}+27.8\times(1-Yv)^{2}+6.95\times Hct+2.34$$
For
Yv calculations, first, Hct from the venipuncture (HctVP)
was used for TRUST and T2-TRIR. Additionally, Hct was estimated from T2-TRIR-derived T1b (HctTRIR) using a model by Li et al (2016)6 and used to calculate Yv and OEF from T2-TRIR-derived
T2b.
OEF was
calculated as follows:
$$OEF=\frac{Y_a-Y_v}{Y_a}\times 100\%$$
In which Ya
is the arterial oxygenation measured by the pulse oximeter.
HctVP and HctTRIR were compared but only for
baseline and recovery scans because the model for HctTRIR requires estimation of Yv.6 At baseline and recovery, Yv was estimated at 65%.6 For the other stimuli, Yv could not
be estimated and using Yv
from the TRUST or T2-TRIR measurements would indirectly use HctVP.
Flow-weighted mean velocity was calculated from the PC scans. Bland-Altman
analysis and repeated measurements ANOVA or Friedman test in case of
non-normality were performed. Post-hoc comparisons with baseline values included
Bonferroni multiple comparison correction.
Results
Mean EtO2 and EtCO2 are shown in Figure 1. SpO2,
TOI, and blood flow were significantly affected by the respiratory challenges (Figure
2A-C). For one volunteer, SpO2 reduction was smaller
presumably due to gas leakage caused by facial hair.
During mild hypoxia, T2b, Yv, and OEF were lower
compared to baseline but this was only significant for Yv measured
by TRUST (p<0.01; Figure 3). During severe hypoxia, T2b, Yv,
and OEF further decreased whereas during hypercapnia, T2b and Yv
increased and OEF decreased compared to baseline. T2b, Yv, and
OEF values were similar at baseline and recovery.
A significant bias was observed between TRUST- and T2-TRIR-derived T2b,
Yv, and OEF values (all p<0.01; Figure 4). For Yv and
OEF this bias was constant across the range of measured values, indicated by
the slopes of 1.0 (confidence interval: 0.92-1.10 and 0.89-1.13).
T1b was significantly lower during severe hypoxia and
hypercapnia compared to baseline (p=0.02 and p<0.01; Figure 5A). While no
significant bias was found between HctVP and HctTRIR
(1.7±6.3%, p=0.20; Figure 5B), the observed correlation between these Hct
values was only weak (r2=0.17, p=0.04; Figure 5C). Using HctTRIR
to calculate T2-TRIR-derived Yv and OEF, the bias between the two techniques
to estimate Yv and OEF became more variable (Figure 5D+E).Discussion
TRUST and T2-TRIR can be used interchangeably for Yv and OEF
estimation as long as the fixed bias is corrected. The observed variance of the
differences between the two techniques is comparable to the previously reported
repeated measures variance of either one.3 However, when replacing venipunctures with
T2-TRIR-derived Hct, the uncertainty between the techniques becomes larger,
especially for OEF.
The source of uncertainty in HctTRIR
estimates remains unknown. The reduction of T1b with hypoxia was expected
because of the shorter T1 of deoxygenated hemoglobin.6 Surprisingly, T1b reduced further
during hypercapnia which could be caused by a pH effect7 or flow-related artefacts.Conclusion
In conclusion, T2-TRIR- and TRUST-derived Yv and OEF values can be compared because of
their constant bias across a wide range of values. Using T2-TRIR, Yv and OEF can
be estimated without a venipuncture but the uncertainty grows noticeably. Additionally,
Hct can be estimated from T2-TRIR-derived T1b values but further
validation with blood samples is still needed.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
(1R01-HL136484-01A1).References
1. Xu F, Ge Y, Lu H. Noninvasive
quantification of whole-brain cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) by MRI.
Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(1):141-148. doi:10.1002/mrm.21994
2. Petersen ET, De Vis J, Alderliesten T, et al. Simultaneous OEF and Haematocrit assessment using T2 Prepared Blood Relaxation Imaging with Inversion Recovery. Proc 20th Annu Meet ISMRM, Melb. Published online 2012:Abstract 472.
3. Baas KPA, Coolen BF, Petersen ET, et al. Comparative Analysis of Blood T2 Values
Measured by T2-TRIR and TRUST. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56(2):516-526.
doi:10.1002/jmri.28066
4. Lu H, Ge Y. Quantitative
evaluation of oxygenation in venous vessels using T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging
MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(2):357-363. doi:10.1002/mrm.21627
5. Bush A, Borzage M, Detterich J,
et al. Empirical model of human blood transverse relaxation at 3 T improves MRI
T2 oximetry. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(6):2364-2371. doi:10.1002/mrm.26311
6.
Li W, Grgac K, Huang A, et al. Quantitative theory for the longitudinal relaxation time
of blood water. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76(1):270-281.
doi:10.1002/mrm.25875
7.
Rane S, Gore JC. Measurement of
T1 of human arterial and venous blood at 7T Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(3):477-479.
doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.008