Zhilang Qiu1, Siyuan Hu1, Walter Zhao1, Ken Sakaie2, Mark A. Griswold3, Derek K. Jones4, and Dan Ma1
1Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 4Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
We propose a new
reconstruction method, named self-calibrated subspace reconstruction, for
multidimensional MR fingerprinting (mdMRF), in order to correct the artifacts
due to inter-shot (segment) magnitude and phase variations, without the need
for extra navigator or calibration data. Different options for utilizing the
low-rank property and the signal structure of mdMRF data are investigated and
the optimal scheme is determined. Such that aliasing-free high-resolution image
reconstruction and high-quality quantification, can be achieved.
Introduction
Previously, a multidimensional MR Fingerprinting framework
(mdMRF) has been developed for joint relaxation and diffusion quantification [1].
Because a diffusion-prepared SSFP acquisition scheme [2-4] was applied,
pulsation motion caused inter-shot magnitude and phase variations could happen at
random locations. In this work, we propose a new reconstruction method for mdMRF,
to address the artifacts caused by inter-shot and intra-shot magnitude and
phase variations, without the need for pulsation gating, extra navigator [5],
real time calibration data [6], or fully-sampled central k-space [7]. We further
investigate different options for utilizing the low-rank property, and determine
the optimal scheme which can fully utilize the signal structure in mdMRF, allowing
aliasing-free high-resolution image reconstruction, and high-quality quantification.Theory
The proposed method contains two procedures:
(1) Temporally Local Low-Rank Matrix Completion
First, we apply a low-rank matrix completion method [7, 8] on
the under-sampled central k-space to obtain aliasing-free low-resolution images
that served as calibration data. However, the temporally global low-rank property,
which is commonly assumed for MRF data [7, 9], is weakened by inter-shot
magnitude and phase variations.
Figure 1 summarizes the inter- and intra-shot magnitude and
phase variations during an mdMRF in vivo scan. Inter- and intra-shot (segment)
magnitude and phase variations are highlighted.
Given the weak correlation
between the inter-shot magnitude and phase variations induced by physiological
motion, the temporally global low-rank property would be greatly weakened,
making the low-rank matrix completion fail. Fortunately, the temporally local
(segment-wise) low-rank property is still satisfied, because the phase
variation in each diffusion preparation can be viewed as an additional “tissue
property” within the segment. Therefore, we use a temporally local low-rank
matrix completion in the first procedure.
(2) Temporally Global Subspace Reconstruction
Because the low-resolution and high-resolution mdMRF data
share the same temporal subspace, temporally subspace reconstruction is proposed
for high-resolution images from the under-sampled full k-space, where the subspace
is estimated from the calibration data obtained in the first procedure. This is
related to subspace reconstruction [10], which is essentially a linear
reconstruction exploring a low-dimensional signal structure [11] given the
subspace known, where the performance would be greatly benefited from more data
sharing.Validation
Figure 2A shows the flowcharts of the proposed
reconstruction and its validation. The reconstruction contains two procedures.
The first is to obtain a fully sampled low-resolution calibration data from the
under-sampled central k-space, using temporally local (segment-wise) matrix
completion. The second is to obtain aliasing-free high-resolution images from
the under-sampled whole k-space, using subspace reconstruction, where the
temporally global subspace is estimated from the calibration data obtained in
the first procedure. Figure 2B shows the validation steps that evaluate
different reconstruction options. Specifically, for the first step that aims to
generate calibration images to capture corrupted images, we compare image
quality of using central or full k-space data, and using global or local
temporally low-rank matrix completion. For the second step that aims to
generate high resolution MRF images, we compare the image quality of using
temporally local or global or joint low rank subspace reconstruction.
The corrupted segments (or images) were detected by a customized
outlier detection algorithm, and excluded in the mapping step using pattern
matching [9] to generate T1, T2 and ADC maps simultaneously.Results
Figure 3
compares three options for the first procedure. Temporally global low-rank
matrix completion fails to obtain an accurate calibration data. Specifically,
when a large rank (=40) is chosen as a stopping criterion, the aliasing
artifacts are still severe. In contrast, when a small rank (=8) is chosen, the
signal components corresponding to small singular values (e.g., the phase
information) are lost. The temporally local low-rank matrix completion
significantly reduces the aliasing artifact, and capture the signal components
corresponding to small singular values (e.g., the phase variations). Joint
global and local low-rank matrix completion has negligible improvement compared
to the local matrix completion. Therefore, temporally local matrix completion
is chosen to obtain a low-resolution calibration data.
Figure 4 shows
that reconstructed images using temporally local subspace possess lower SNR
than those using temporally global subspace. Joint global and local subspace
reconstruction have slight improvement compared to those from global subspace
reconstruction, and the improvement is more significant in the corrupted
images. This indicates an effective joint utilization of global and local low-rank
properties. In practice, the temporally global subspace reconstruction is
chosen for this procedure, because the difference is slight and the subsequent dictionary
matching [9] can further correct for incoherent artifacts.
Figure 5
shows the quantitative maps obtained by mdMRF without pulsation gating. The ADC
map in the non-corrected case has severe shading artifacts, which appear as
uneven and overestimated ADC values. The artifacts can be addressed after
correction.Discussion and Conclusion
In this work, a self-calibrated
subspace reconstruction using temporally local low-rank matrix completion,
which takes advantage of the temporally local low-rank property of mdMRF data,
to address weakened global low-rank assumption caused by inter-shot (segment)
magnitude modifications and phase variations. No extra navigator, realtime
calibration data, or fully-sampled central k-space is required. Aliasing-free
high-resolution images can be reconstructed and corrected to generate
artifact-free T1, T2, and ADC maps.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Siemens Healthineers and NIH grant R01 NS1094391.References
1. Afzali M, et al. MR
Fingerprinting with b‐Tensor
Encoding for Simultaneous Quantification of Relaxation and Diffusion in a
Single Scan. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:2043-2057.
2. Jeong EK, et al.
High-resolution diffusionweighted 3D MRI, using diffusion-weighted
driven-equilibrium (DW-DE) and multishot segmented 3D-SSFP without navigator
echoes. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:821-829.
3. Nguyen C, et al. In vivo
three-dimensional high resolution cardiac diffusion-weighted MRI: a motion
compensated diffusion-prepared balanced steady-state free precession approach. Magn
Reson Med. 2014;72:1257-1267.
4. Lu L, et al. Diffusion‐prepared fast imaging with steady‐state free precession (DP‐FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T. Magn
Reson Med. 2012;68:868-73.
5. Cao X, et al. 3D Diffusion-prepared
MRF (3DM) with cardiac gating for rapid high resolution whole-brain T1, T2,
proton density and diffusivity mapping. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med.
2022.
6. Ma S, et al. Three‐dimensional simultaneous brain T1, T2, and ADC
mapping with MR Multitasking. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84:72-88.
7. Doneva M, et al. Matrix
completion-based reconstruction for undersampled magnetic resonance
fingerprinting data. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;41:41-52.
8. Candes EJ, Recht B. Exact
matrix completion via convex optimization. Found Comput Math. 2009;9:717–72.
9. Ma D, et al. Magnetic
resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495:187-192.
10. Liang ZP. Spatiotemporal
imagingwith partially separable functions. In2007 4th IEEE international
symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro 2007 Apr 12 (pp. 988-991).
IEEE.
11. Tamir JI, et al.
Computational MRI with physics-based constraints: Application to multicontrast
and quantitative imaging. IEEE signal processing magazine. 2020 Jan
17;37(1):94-104.