Mi zhou1, Meining Chen2, and Yuting Wang1
1Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, chengdu, China, 2MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Data Acquisition, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
DWI has an
important role in the staging and treatment response assessment of patients
with rectal cancer, but its resolution is much lower than dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI and T2W images. We
achieved a high-resolution scan of the rectal cancer using SMS HR rs-EPI
sequences with a resolution of 1.1×1.1×2 mm
3. The SMS HR rs-EPI provided a significantly better
image quality and more valuable ADC than conventional HR rs-EPI when assessing
rectal cancer. The pretreatment ADC values of HR rs-EPI could be utilized to
distinguish well and poorly differentiated rectal cancer.
Introduction
Colorectal
cancer is the third most common cancer1, MRI is the preferred
diagnostic tool for local staging of rectal cancer, which provides excellent
soft-tissue contrast and may be used to assess treatment response and detect
postoperative local recurrence 2. Improving MRI resolution
could characterize the margin of rectal cancer more accurately and show the
internal heterogeneity of the lesion clearly, which is important for assessing
the degree of differentiation of rectal cancer. However, high-resolution
imaging of rectal cancer is mainly focused on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and
T2W images, excluding DWI image. Previous studies have demonstrated that rs-EPI
with SMS provided higher spatial resolution compared with conventional HR
rs-EPI with comparable or superior image quality and stable apparent diffusion
coefficient (ADC) value in breast, liver and abdominopelvic structures3-6.
This study focused on the following two aims: first, to compare the image
quality (IQ) of SMS HR rs-EPI and conventional HR rs-EPI in assessing rectum,
and second, to determine whether the ADC values of rectal cancer measured on SMS
HR rs-EPI sequence are correlated with the T stage and can predict the
differentiation grade of rectal cancer.Method
A total of eighty-three patients ( 55 males and 28
females, 22-76 years old, with a mean age of 54.6±11.9 years old) with rectal
cancer were enrolled, who had undergone SMS HR rs-EPI sequence and a
conventional HR rs-EPI sequence by using 3.0 T MR system with 30-channels coil
(MAGNETOM VIDA, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The details of
parameters are shown in Table 1. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and
contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated according to the following
equations: SNR=Slesion /SDbackground, CNR=|Slesion-Snormal_tissue|/sqrt(SDlesion2+SDnormal_tissue2) . The region of
interest (ROI) were drawn in homogeneous normal rectum tissue, which was located
far from the tumor area. Subjective assessment, SNR, CNR and ADC value of the lesion were measured for comparison by paired t-test or Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test. The spearman rank correlation analysis test and the receiver operating characteristic
(ROC) curve was performed to evaluate the correlation between tumor ADC values,
corresponding T stage and differentiation degree of rectal cancer.Results
The subjective assessment of IQ of SMS HR rs-EPI
were superior to conventional HR rs-EPI (p<0.001)( Figure 1,2). SNR and CNR were also significantly
higher in SMS HR rs-EPI (p<0.001) and there was a significant difference
between tumor ADC values on SMS HR rs-EPI and that on HR rs-EPI in the group of
low to moderate differentiation degree (Table 2). T stage of rectal cancer was
inversely correlated with ADC values measured on SMS HR rs-EPI (r= -0.622,
p<0.001) and HR rs-EPI (r= -0.567, p<0.001) and the area under the curve
(AUC) of SMS HR rs-EPI in predicting well-differentiated rectal cancer were
0.768 (Figure 3).Discussion
Better sharpness and lesion conspicuity, less
distortion and image artifacts, higher SNR, CNR, and overall image scores
demonstrated the feasibility of high spatial resolution rs-EPI with SMS
acceleration in the clinical evaluation of rectal cancer. we achieved a higher
in-plane and slice resolution DWI of 1.1×1.1×2 mm3. The high spatial
resolution DWI with SMS acceleration can help increase the lesion conspicuity
and sharpness of anatomical details and describe the shape and margins of
rectal cancer accurately, which is greatly helpful for the staging and
differentiation of rectal cancer. Regarding the relationship between ADC values
and pathology T staging of rectal cancer, we observed a significant tendency
for an inverse correlation between the ADC values of the two different DWI
methods and the T staging. This may be due to the fact that with the increase
of a tumor's T stage, its invasiveness increases, causing a continuous decrease
in extracellular space, and an increase in diffusion restriction of water
molecules, which results in a decline in ADC7. Our study found that
the ADC values of two DWI methods were statistically different in low to
moderate differentiated rectal cancer, which was mainly attributed to the fact
that the higher resolution leads to a lower SNR, causing the ADC to show
instability in the measurement at higher levels of cell malignancy. And ROC
analysis also showed that the ADC of SMS HR rs-EPI may have the potential
ability in predicting well-differentiated rectal cancer, which as a
non-invasive technique, this ability of SMS HR rs-EPI should gain more
attention to for predicting pathological results, and more patients with
well-differentiated rectal cancer should be enrolled in future, and also we
will continue to explore its treatment prediction in this cohort of patients
with follow-ups.Conclusion
The SMS HR rs-EPI with SMS
technique provided significantly higher IQ, SNR, and CNR and stable ADC
compared to conventional HR rs-EPI. Additionally, the pretreatment ADC values
of SMS HR rs-EPI could be utilized to distinguish well and poorly
differentiated rectal cancer.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lee Y, Hsieh C, Chuang
J, et al. Prognostic significance of partial tumor regression after
preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon
Rectum. 2013; 56:1093-1101
2. Fernandes M, Gollub J,
Brown G, et al. The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation. Surg Oncol.
2022;10:17-39.
3. Taron J, Martirosian P,
Kuestner T, et al. Scan time reduction in diffusion-weighted imaging of the
pancreas using a simultaneous multislice technique with different acceleration
factors: How fast can we go? Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1504-1511.
4. Peng S, Guo Y, Zhang
X, et al. High-Resolution DWI with Simultaneous Multi-Slice Readout-Segmented
Echo Planar Imaging for the Evaluation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Diagnostics. 2021;11:122-273.
5. Xu J, Cheng J, Wang T,
et al. Simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging with higher
spatial resolution for patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine
tumours. Clin Radiol. 2021;76(81):11-81.
6. Ciritsis A, Rossi C,
Marcon M, et al. Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging for lymph node
assessment in the pelvis applying simultaneous multislice acquisition: A
healthy volunteer study. Medicine. 2018;97: 11745-11755.
7. Sun Y, Tong T, Cai S,
et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value: a potential imaging
biomarker that reflects the biological features of rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2014;
9:109371-109377.