Junlin Guo1, Nazirah Mohd Khairi1, Lyuan Xu1,2, and Don Mitchell Wilkes1
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: fMRI (resting state), Brain, Spatiotemporal
The human brain, at rest, is complex and many functional studies
focus on the brain patterns around criticality. This work addresses a novel perspective,
the avalanche, in resting-state fMRI. In this work, we design two data-driven signal
modeling approaches that dynamically measure and visualize the signal entropy from
both spatial and temporal aspects. The first approach applies a
clustering-based scheme with the Markov chain. The second method utilizes the
autoregressive model with a sliding window. The results show a consistent, less
complex pattern at the avalanche state, from which the interpretation of the
brain can be clearer than at criticality.
Introduction
The human brain is considered a complex system, which
intuitively suggests a system undergoing a characteristic order-disorder phase
transition around a critical point, "criticality."1 This critical
state has raised the interest of researchers in studying the brain. Studies2 show
that the brain at criticality presents the highest system complexity, and the connections between brain
regions reach a maximal capacity.
However, this work addresses a novel perspective from
studying the more simple and highly organized brain state, denoted as
"avalanche." Tagliazucchi, 2012 proposed a point process approach to
avalanche detection using the fMRI modality for the first time1. In his work,
the avalanche, a tiny portion of the fMRI signal (about 6%), was shown to
preserve correlational information for encoding resting-state networks using
the entire fMRI signal. Recently, some works also involve a similar concept of
studying the functional connectivity (FC) from only the cascades of peaks of
the seed region's fMRI signal3-5.
In this work, we perform dynamic analysis around the
large-scale avalanche. Firstly, we perform a clustering-based brain state
decomposition and correlate the brain state transition with the avalanche using
the Markov model. Secondly, we propose a new method of dynamically measuring temporal signal
entropy utilizing the autoregressive model and sliding window. Both show
that the avalanche represents a brain state of lower entropy, which should
inspire more attention in the research field.
Methods
HCP dataset.
54
young adult subjects were randomly drawn from the 3T minimum preprocessed
resting-state fMRI scans in the HCP S1200 release. A gradient-echo EPI sequence
uses the parameters: repetition time (TR) = 720 ms, echo time (TE) = 33 ms,
image matrix = 109 × 91 × 91 voxels, 72 slices, 1200 volumes. Reference6 provides a detailed description.
Large-scale fMRI avalanche.
In Fig. 1A, the number of
clusters (group of active voxels) and their variability reach the maximum at
criticality (Red square and Dash line). Above the criticality (right side), the
reversed correlation presents a pattern of coupling small clusters into fewer
larger ones. Thus, the avalanche is represented as the right tail of Fig. 1A
and the few gigantic peaks in Fig. 1B.
Spatiotemporal pattern decomposition
We
performed a clustering-based signal decomposition approach to measure the fMRI
signal's co-activation patterns (CAPs). The procedure is shown in Fig. 2. This approach correlates the
global signal to the spatial patterns.
Markov chain and entropy. The state sequence is then input into a Markov chain model7 that formulates the probabilistic
interpretation of the temporal dynamics of the state transition. The information
entropy8 is then computed based on the transition matrix to show the complexity
of the dynamic change of the
states.
$$spatiotemporal\ entropy\ of \ state \ i:\ H_{i} = \sum H_{i, j} = -\sum P(j|i)_{t|t-1} logP(j|i)_{t|t-1}$$
Autoregressive model on temporal predictivity
A small
order (M) autoregressive (AR) model9 (equation below) is utilized to
explore the dynamic change of the signal of interest. A sliding window (of length 2M +1, M=2) scheme then truncates
the fMRI signal for the data-driven measure. The Mean Squared Error (MSE) of
each window then quantifies the signal predictivity dynamically. Conceptually, the
high MSE value corresponds to more complex and erratic dynamic signal predictions (high entropy).
$$X_{t} = c + \sum_{i=1}^{M}\phi_{i}X_{t-i} \ + \varepsilon\ (noise)$$Results
Spatiotemporal
correlation
In the
experiment, we applied the clustering scheme with multiple choice of k for
robust results. Fig. 3A is a global correlation signal measure (IWBC) from our
previous work6, and Fig. 3B displays the corresponding activation patterns. Obviously, the decomposed brain activation shows a synchronization
with the global fMRI signal. The large peaks in Fig. 3A (avalanche) present a
highly synchronized brain co-activation shown as Fig. 3B state 8.
Spatiotemporal
entropy using the Markov model
For the spatiotemporal entropy, we also reproduce the results
for 54 subjects and different k. Fig. 4 (k = 10 and
15) illustrates the state transition complexity from the group analysis. As
expected, the avalanche states (right tail) present low complexity. Interestingly,
the very quiet states also show a less complex pattern.
Temporal entropy using the AR model
We use the global mean as the global fMRI signal. In Fig. 5, two temporal points representing significantly high and
low signal magnitudes are annotated. Apparently, the avalanche state (765 TR)
is linked to a lower MSE, representing the signal as more predictable. Instead,
the temporal signal complexity is much higher at or below criticality (514 TR).
This consistent pattern is also found across the subjects.
Discussion
In this work, we found in all methods that the avalanche state presents a
low entropy. Compared to the criticality, the avalanche state tends to stay
consistent (from spatiotemporal entropy) and simple (from our defined temporal signal entropy). An
inspiring direction in practice is that apart from studying the brain functions
from an ad-hoc and complex state as criticality, the brain signal interpretation can be clearer from the avalanche.
Conclusion
In this work, we design clustering-based and autoregressive models to measure the resting-state fMRI signal entropy dynamically. The signal of interest, the avalanche, shows consistent patterns of low entropy in all methods and thus provides insight into studying brain function through the highly organized state.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Tagliazucchi, E., Balenzuela, P., Fraiman, D., and Chialvo, D. R., “Criticality in large-scale brain fmri dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis,” Frontiers in physiology 3, 15 (2012).
2.
B. Song, N. Ma, G.
Liu, H. Zhang, L. Yu, L. Liu and J. Zhang, “Maximal flexibility in dynamic
functional connectivity with critical dynamics revealed by fMRI data analysis
and brain network modelling,” journal of neural engineering, vol. 16,
no. 5, p. 056002, 2019.
3. X. Liu, N. Zhang, C. Chang and
J. H. Duyn, “Co-activation patterns in resting-state fMRI signals,” NeuroImage,
vol. 180, pp. 485-494, 2018.
4. A. Nalci, B. D. Rao
and T. T. Liu, “Global signal regression acts as a temporal downweighting
process in resting-state fMRI,” Neuroimage, vol. 152, pp. 602-618.,
2017.
5. H. He and T. T. Liu, “A
geometric view of global signal confounds in resting-state functional MRI,” Neuroimage,
vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2339-2348., 2012.
6. J. Guo, “Co-activation
Pattern Analysis of Brain fMRI Signal at Avalanches (Master thesis).,” Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, 2020.
7.
H. Maltby,
"Brilliant," [Online]. Available: https://brilliant.org/wiki/markov-chains/.
8. R. M. Gray, Entropy and
Information theory, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
9. H. Akaike, “Autoregressive
Model Fitting for Control,” in: Parzen E., Tanabe K., Kitagawa G. (eds) Selected
Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, New York, Springer, 1998.