Qing Liu1, Qi Liu2, Jing Li1, Zhongqi Zhang2, Jian Xu2, Jeff L Zhang3, and Haoran Sun4
1Radiology, Beichen Hospital, Tianjin, China, 2UIH America, Inc., Houston, TX, United States, 3School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China, 4Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Kidney, DSC & DCE Perfusion
A 3D, free-breathing renal DCE MRI technique is developed
using MRI Multitasking. It produces motion-resolved, high spatial and temporal
resolutions images, thus does not require image registration post-processing.
The feasibility of this technique in renal DCE MRI is evaluated on healthy
subjects.
Introduction
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI can be used to non-invasively
characterize renal function by measuring renal blood flow, glomerular
filtration rate and various transit times. However, its clinical adoption has
been hindered by low spatial and temporal resolutions and the need for breath-hold
[1,2]. MRI Multitasking is an emerging technique that can resolve multiple
‘tasks’ simultaneously using a low-rank tensor model [3,4], one benefit being
accelerated reconstruction of multi-dimensional images. With free-breathing, Multitasking
has been shown to produce images with high spatiotemporal resolution for
multiple applications, including dynamic T1 mapping of pancreas, carotid vessel
and breast, and myocardial mapping without electrocardiogram [5-8]. These
abilities make Multitasking a potential technique for renal MRI. Here we seek
to establish the feasibility of Multitasking, using a coronal scan strategy, as
a 3D, free-breathing renal DCE solution with high spatial and temporal
resolution.Methods
Sequence design: A 3D spoiled-GRE pulse sequence was
developed featuring continuous data acquisition throughout the scan. The
encodings along the slab and phase-encoding directions followed randomized
Gaussian distribution, with every eighth readout being a navigator readout
without encoding (Figure 1). Coronal orientation was used so that a thin slab
can cover the kidneys efficiently. Water excitation was used for fat suppression.
Read-out was along the head-foot direction. A cubic volume-of-interest (VOI) on
the scanner console was carefully placed over the lung-diaphragm interface
(Figure 2) and within the imaging volume for tracking respiratory motion.
Reconstruction: Reconstruction followed similar procedures
as in previous publications [5-7]. Specifically, the underlying
multidimensional images are represented by a 3-way tensor $$$\bf \it A$$$ with its first
dimension concatenating 3D voxel locations and other two dimensions indexing
respiratory-motion and DCE time-course. Preliminary real-time reconstruction
with 42 ms temporal resolution was first performed and the relative
diaphragm-lung interface position was identified by an image post-processing algorithm,
based on which each imaging readout was assigned to one of twelve respiratory
states. Then a multi-dimensional temporal basis $$$\Phi$$$
can be
determined from navigator readouts (Red circles in Figure 1) using high-order
singular value decomposition. Applying the principle of partial separability, $$$A_{(1)}=U\Phi$$$
, where $$$A_{(1)}$$$
is the mode-1
matricization of $$$\bf \it A$$$ and $$$U$$$ is the
spatial factors. $$$U$$$ can be
recovered by solving the optimization problem:
$$\widehat{U}=argmin_{U}{\parallel d_{img} - \Omega F S U \Phi\parallel}_2^2 + R(U)$$
where $$$d_{img}$$$ is the
acquired imaging readout (Blue circles in Figure 1), $$$\Omega$$$ is
undersampling operator, $$$F$$$ is Fourier
transform operator, $$$S$$$ is coil
sensitivity operator, and $$$R$$$ is spatial total
variation regularization operator. 12 respiratory motion states were used for
reconstruction. Inline reconstruction was approximately 10 mins.
Study experiment: All data were acquired on a
clinical 3T scanner (uMR790, United Imaging, Shanghai, China).
Imaging parameters are summarized in Table 1. Twelve volunteers were recruited
after IRB consent for kidney DCE imaging. Intravenous bolus injection of 3ml gadodiamide
(Omniscan, GE Healthcare, Ireland) was performed with the flow rate of 3.0 ml/s.
A temporal resolution of 2.3 sec was empirically chosen for this specific
application, although the technique enables reconstruction using arbitrary
temporal resolution. For kinetic
modeling, images were imported to a vendor provided post-processing
workstation. After manually placing ROIs in the aorta for the arterial input
function, the Tofts model was employed for pixel-wise kinetic parameter fitting
in the kidneys. In one subject a 1 sec temporal resolution reconstruction was
also performed, to illustrate differences in contrast enhancement dynamics.
Results
Typical DCE images are shown in Figure 3. The images
demonstrate very high resolution that permits resolving fine structures in the
FOV. The kidneys are automatically registered, showing distinct contrast in
select time frames between cortex and medulla. Sample kinetic parameter maps
are shown in Figure 4. Good and clear contrast between cortex and medulla
reflects that any motion among the temporal frames was properly handled by the
technique. Figure 5 shows images from one subject reconstructed with a 1 sec
resolution. Subtracted images correspond to aortic, renal cortical, and renal
medullary phases. Enhancement curves from different tissues exhibit unique
patterns. Conclusion and discussion
A 3D, free-breathing renal DCE MRI technique with 1.3×1.3×3.0 mm3
spatial and 2.6 s temporal resolution was developed. Thanks to Multitasking’s
low-rank tensor imaging strategy, this technique can produce motion-resolved,
high quality dynamic images. These automatically co-registered images should
eliminate the need for further post-processing, which potentially introduces
errors in parameter mapping. The feasibility of kinetic modeling with this new
technique was also demonstrated using Tofts model. Future studies should
involve models more suitable for kidney kinetic fitting, and should focus on
cross-validation this high temporal resolution MRI DCE technique with CT-based
DCE in healthy and diseased populations.Acknowledgements
This work was partially facilitated by a non-exclusive
license agreement between Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and United Imaging
Healthcare.References
[1] Liu W, Sung K, Ruan D. Shape-based motion correction in
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of renal function.
Med Phys 2014;41:122302.
[2] Notohamiprodjo M, Reiser MF, Sourbron SP. Diffusion and
perfusion of the kidney. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76(3):337-347.
[3] Shaw JL, Yang Q, Zhou Z, Deng Z, Nguyen C, Li D,
Christodoulou AG. Free-breathing, non-ECG, continuous myocardial T1 mapping
with cardiovascular magnetic resonance multitasking. Magn Reson Med. 2019
Apr;81(4):2450-2463.
[4] Christodoulou AG, Shaw JL, Nguyen C, Yang Q, Xie Y, Wang
N, Li D. Magnetic resonance multitasking for motion-resolved quantitative
cardiovascular imaging. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(4):215.
[5] Wang N, Gaddam S, Wang L, et al. Six-dimensional
quantitative DCE MR Multitasking of the entire abdomen: Method and application
to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84: 928– 948.
[6] Wang N, Christodoulou AG, Xie Y, et al. Quantitative 3D
dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging of carotid vessel wall by fast T1
mapping using Multitasking. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 81: 2302– 2314.
[7] Wang N, Xie Y, Fan Z, et al. Five-dimensional
quantitative low-dose Multitasking dynamic contrast- enhanced MRI: Preliminary
study on breast cancer. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 85: 3096– 3111.
[8] Cao T, Wang N, Kwan AC, et
al. Free-breathing, non-ECG, simultaneous myocardial T1, T2, T2*, and
fat-fraction mapping with motion-resolved cardiovascular MR multitasking. Magn
Reson Med. 2022; 88: 1748- 1763.