Guangqi Li1, Xinyu Ye1, Yuan Lian1, Yajing Zhang2, and Hua Guo1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2MR Clinical Science, Philips Health Technology (China), Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Single-shot
spiral acquisitions allow shorter TE, thus provide higher SNR compared to EPI
acquisitions for DWI. However, spiral acquisitions are sensitive to field
inhomogeneity. Parallel imaging techniques can be used to alleviate static B0
off-resonance effects. In this study, single-shot spiral acquisitions with a
large acceleration factor of 5 or 6 were used to achieve sub-millimeter
diffusion tensor imaging at 3T. The in vivo results demonstrate that the single-shot
spiral sampling strategy can be adopted to achieve whole-brain diffusion tensor
imaging with an in-plane resolution of 0.77×0.77mm
2.
Introduction
Diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) is a powerful tool for clinical diagnosis and neuroscience studies.
Since center-out spiral imaging enables shorter TE acquisition compared to EPI,
it has been applied for DWI acquisition 1-7. However, spiral
sampling is sensitive to field inhomogeneity and the blurring artifacts induced
by field inhomogeneity can degrade the spatial resolution and the image
quality. Parallel imaging techniques have been used to shorten spiral readouts,
and thus sharp diffusion images can be obtained using single-shot spiral acquisitions.
However, increased acceleration factors result in higher g-factor penalty with
noise amplification, and then the image quality (low SNR or aliasing artifacts)
is degraded. The aim of this work is to study the feasibility of single-shot
spiral acquisitions using a large under-sampling factor (5 or 6) and denoising to achieve sub-millimeter
diffusion tensor imaging.Methods
1.
Data acquisition
Uniform-density
spiral was used to acquire diffusion data. All spiral diffusion
imaging experiments were performed using a Stejskal-Tanner diffusion sequence
on a Philips Ingenia CX 3.0T scanner using
a 32-channel head coil. The gradient system was operated at a maximum gradient
strength of 31 mT/m and a maximum slew rate of 200 T/m/s.
Experiment 1: The
feasibility of single-shot spiral acquisitions with a large under-sampling
factor. FOV=220×220mm2, resolution=1.0×1.0×4.0mm3, b-value=1000s/mm2, 12 diffusion directions,
TE/TR=55/3000ms, 24 axial slices. AQ=41.0, 32.0, and 28.0ms for the single-shot
acquisitions with in-plane acceleration factor=4, 5 and 6, respectively.
Experiment 2: Sub-millimeter
diffusion imaging using a single-shot spiral acquisition. FOV=210×210mm2,
in-plane resolution=0.77×0.77mm2, 24 slices. b-value=1000 s/mm2, 12
diffusion directions, TE/TR=55/3000ms, AQ=40.0ms, acceleration
factor=6.
In all
experiments, SPIR technique was used to suppress fat signals. In addition, low-resolution field maps acquired using a multi-echo GRE sequence were used
for deblurring. Further imaging details can be found in Table 1.
2.
Image reconstruction
The single-shot
spiral DW images were off-line reconstructed using SPIRiT algorithm 8.
$$argmin\left|\right|Dx-y\left|\right|_{2}^{2} +\lambda\left|\right|(G_{SPIRIT}-I)\left|\right|_{2}^{2}$$
where x is the k-space dataset to be reconstructed, y is the under-sampled k-space data, D is the under-sampling operator, $$$G_{SPIRIT}$$$ is the SPIRiT kernel. In this study, 𝜆=1.0
and the minimization
problem was solved using the CG algorithm. CPR method was used for off-resonance correction 9. FA maps were calculated using FSL toolbox 10.
3.
Image Denoising
A larger
under-sampled factor of 5 or 6 was used in the single-shot spiral acquisition,
so the single-shot DW images were noisy. In this work, we tried to use non-local
low-rank denoising method to suppress noise 11. The noisy
complex-valued diffusion images are denoised after off-resonance correction.Results and Discussion
For Experiment 1, Figure 1 shows the DW
images acquired by the single-shot spiral acquisitions with the acceleration
factor of 4, 5 and 6, respectively. There are no obvious aliasing artifacts in
the reconstructed images. This demonstrates that single-shot
spiral-based diffusion imaging can be accelerated with a factor up to 6, which is challenging for EPI DWI.
However, for R=5 and R=6 reconstruction results, the
diffusion images with NSA=1 are noisy. Signal averaging is required to
maintain the image SNR.
Figure 2 shows the cFA maps of a representative slice. The cFA maps of the diffusion
images with and without denoising are shown in the Figure 3. The NSA=2 images
for R=5 and NSA=3 images for R=6 are denoised, respectively. The denoising
results are visually similar to the NSA=12 reference results. The results show
that denoising can improve the image quality distinctly and is useful to
suppress the noise in the diffusion images, so the number of signal averages
can be reduced.
For Experiment 2, Figure 4 shows the single-shot
spiral diffusion images with an in-plane resolution of 0.77×0.77mm2.
The b=0 images, single DW images, mean DWI and
cFA maps of six representative slices are shown. The fine
structures of the cerebellum, middle pons, corona radiate and temporal lobes
are well rendered and shown in the zoomed-in cFA maps.
Compared to EPI, center-out
spiral acquisitions possess shorter TE and thus provide higher SNR. Moreover, spiral
sampling offers a favorable g-factor behavior 7. Thus, the single-shot uniform-density spiral acquisition with
under-sampling factor of 6 can be well reconstructed and used to achieve sub-millimeter diffusion
imaging. For sub-millimeter DWI, the spiral readout duration can be very long (>80ms for 3-shot acquisitions). Thus, to minimize off-resonance effect, increasing the number of shots
is required. Our results indicate that the denoising
can suppress noise in the diffusion images, so the number of
signal averages can be reduced to 3. Such a strategy can also be transferred to multi-shot spiral (e.g. 6 shots with R=2). In addition, in this work, diffusion data were acquired at 3.0T, the R=6 diffusion images are noisy. A future study can be
carried out to acquire sub-millimeter diffusion images using this
single-shot acquisition strategy at 7.0T or higher field strength (even with
powerful gradients), then the SNR
of diffusion images will be improved further.Conclusion
This
study demonstrates the reconstruction feasibility of single-shot spiral acquisition with a
large under-sampling factor of 5 or 6 to achieve sub-millimeter diffusion
tensor imaging with off-resonance well controlled. High quality
diffusion-weighted images with an in-plane resolution of 0.77×0.77mm2
are acquired by using a single-shot spiral acquisition with an
acceleration factor of 6.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement
found.References
1.
Li G, Shao X, Ye X, and Guo H. Whole-brain Diffusion Tensor Imaging Using
Single-Shot Spiral Sampling. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of
ISMRM. 2021; 1312.
2.
Börnert P, Eggers H, Nehrke K, et al. Single-shot Diffusion-weighted Spiral
Imaging in the Brain on a Clinical Scanner. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual
Meeting of ISMRM. 2019; 0243.
3.
Wilm BJ, Roesler M, Hennel F, et al. Diffusion Imaging with Very High
Resolution and Very Short Echo Time. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting
of ISMRM. 2020; 0965.
4.
Wilm BJ, Barmet C, Gross S, et al. Single-shot spiral imaging enabled by an
expanded encoding model: Demonstration in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med.
2017;77(1):83-91.
5.
Lee Y, Wilm BJ, Nagy Z, et al. High-Resolution Diffusion MRI: In-Vivo
Demonstration of the SNR Benefit of Single-Shot Spiral Acquisition vs. EPI. In
Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. 2019; 0767.
6.
Wilm BJ, Hennel F, Roesler MB, et al. Minimizing the echo time in diffusion
imaging using spiral readouts and a head gradient system. Magn Reson Med. Dec
2020;84(6):3117-3127.
7.
Lee Y, Wilm BJ, Brunner DO, et al. On the signal-to-noise ratio benefit of
spiral acquisition in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. Apr 2021;85(4):1924-1937.
8.
Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging
reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(2):457-471.
9.
Noll DC, Pauly JM, Meyer CH, et al. Deblurring for non-2D fourier transform
magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1992; 25: 319- 333.
10. Jenkinson M, Beckmann
CF, Behrens TE, et al. FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62(2):782-790.
11.
Ye X, Ma X, Pan Z, et al. Non-local low rank denoising method for
complex-valued DWI. In
Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. 2022; 3041.