Antoine Cherix1, Mohamed Tachount1, and Jason Lerch1,2
1Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Mouse Imaging Centre (MICe), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Keywords: Spectroscopy, Animals
31P-MRS experiments in mouse brain are scarce and often
limited to ultra-high field scanners. We have recently reported that
31P-MRS
is feasible in mouse brain at 7T as well. We now tested the potential of using
saturation transfer experiments in the same setting to measure the creatine
kinase rate in mouse brain.
Introduction
Phosphorous-31 (31P) Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy (MRS) is a powerful method to assess brain energy metabolism in
vivo1. However, studies investigating mouse brain are
scarce and often limited to ultra high-field scanners. We have previously reported
that 31P-MRS is feasible at 7T for studying mouse brain energy
metabolism2. We now bring this one step further to assess
the feasibility of saturation transfer experiments to measure creatine kinase
(CK) activity in vivo. For this, we compared the available protocol on the
vendor’s machine with our implemented BISTRO (B1 insensitive selective train
to obliterate signal scheme)
sequence3 on phantom. By producing a gradual increase in the
saturation pulse power, BISTRO has been shown to obtain a sharp saturation
profile which can help reduce bleedover on adjacent resonances,
particularly critical at long saturation times4. We then used our protocol to assess mouse
brain phosphocreatine (PCr) to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) fluxes in vivo
and identify potential sex-related differences.Methods
This study was performed with the approval of the
local animal care and use committee. Eleven adult male (n=5) and female (n=6) C57BL/6J
mice were scanned on a 7 Tesla (70/20) BioSpec MRI scanner (Bruker, Ettlingen,
DE) under isoflurane anesthesia (1-2%). 31P-MRS
was acquired using a dual tuned 31P/1H
surface coil with a single 10mm 31P loop (PulseTeq Ltd, Chobham, UK)
used as transceiver (Tx/Rx). Using the 1H-channel, a 210uL voxel (7x5x6mm3) was placed in the center of the
brain using anatomical T2-weighted images
(TurboRARE). Shimming was performed in the voxel to reach a water linewidth at half maximumh of 26±3Hz, followed by a 31P-MRS acquisition using 3D-ISIS
(Npoints=1024, AcquisitionBW=40ppm, TR=8s). All pulses were optimized
in phantoms to adjust the power for maximal signal Intensity. Progressive
saturation transfer experiment was done using BISTRO sequence3, using
a train of
variable number of saturation modules. Each module (336 ms duration) consists
of eight HS2 pulses (T=40ms, BW=100Hz) with variable RF power (with following
scaling factors: 0.02, 0.04, 0.07, 0.14, 0.27, 0.49, 0.82, 1) applied at yATP
offset, i.e. -2.50 ppm5. Saturation time was
randomised at 5 different values (336, 672, 1’009, 2’018 and 4’710 ms) and
control spectrum was acquired with a mirrored saturation at +2.50ppm. The
saturation transfer experiments lasted ~2h per subject.
Spectra
were processed (phasing, B0-drift correction) in jMRUI and analysed with AMARES, using
Lorentzian line-shape and constrained frequency, linewidth and amplitude for
each component. A mono-exponential function was fitted (MATLAB) to the relative
PCr signal decay as a function of saturation time (tsat) using the following
equation: MPCr(tsat)/MPCr(0) =
(1-k*T1)+k*T1*exp(-tsat/T1), to determine both k, the pseudo
first-order forward reaction PCr->ATP rate constant (kPCr->ATP), and T1, the apparent T1 of PCr6. The pH was determined from the
chemical shift difference between Pi and PCr on the averaged spectra for each
mouse. All group statistics were done using Prism (GraphPad, Prism 9).Results
31P-MRS saturation pulses using BISTRO (Fig1.a,
i.e. HS2 pulses with increasing amplitude) performed better in phantom compared
to the HS2 pulses with constant amplitude (Fig1.b) or to the available version
on the vendor’s system (e.g. using a Sinc3 saturation pulse, Fig 1.c). This was
particularly critical at long saturation times. When applied in vivo
(Fig2.a), BISTRO was able to effectively saturate the yATP signal (Fig2.b),
while not causing any noticeable bleed-over in the control experiment at long
saturation times (Fig2.c). This protocol was then applied to assess brain
metabolic rate of ATP synthesis from PCr in adult C57BL/6 mice. While we found
an overall kPCr->ATP of 0.47±0.22 [s-1] in mouse brain, we
observed a significantly higher value (p=0.04, Fig3.a-b) for male mice (0.62±0.13 [s-1]) compared to females
(0.35±0.22 [s-1]). Although no difference
in physiological parameters was observed (%isoflurane dose, body temperature
and breathing rate), male mice used in this study had higher body weight (+35%,
p=0.0002) and were younger (-26%, p=0.0013). Importantly, the higher kPCr->ATP in male mice could not be
attributed to a reduction in pH (n.s.), as CK forward reaction is pH dependent.
Finally, strong correlations were observed (Fig.4) between kPCr->ATP
and the body weight, age and respiration rate,
suggesting the sex differences might have an indirect cause.Discussion
Our results confirm that
saturation transfer experiments at 7T are feasible in mouse brain using BISTRO
sequence. We report values of kPCr->ATP rate constant in mouse brain that
are comparable to the only report to date acquired at 14.1 Tesla6. Furthermore, our protocol was
able to identify variations in kPCr->ATP that might have an underlying
biological origin. CK fluxes are known to be affected by age and by psychiatric
disorders or neurodegenerative diseases7,8. While we observed sex differences
in mouse brain, further investigations will determine whether they are related
to body weight or age.Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Wellcome Centre for
Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)References
1 Lei, H. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 14409–14414
(2003)
2 Cherix, A et al. in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.
30, (2022)
3 Luo, Y. et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 45, 1095–1102
(2001)
4 Horská, A. et al. Magma Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med.
5, 159–163 (1997)
5 Lee, B.-Y. et al. NMR Biomed. 31, e3842 (2018)
6 Mlynárik, V. et al. J. Alzheimers Dis. 31, S87–S99 (2012)
7 Andres, R. H. et al. Brain Res. Bull. 76, 329–343 (2008)
8 Allen, P. J. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1442–1462
(2012)