Rong Guo1,2, Yibo Zhao2,3, Yudu Li2,4, Chao Ma5, Wen Jin2,3, Yao Li6, Georges El Fakhri5, Brad Sutton2,3,4,7,8, and Zhi-Pei Liang2,3,4
1Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Urbana, IL, United States, 2Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 4National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 5Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 6School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 7Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 8Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Spectroscopy, Spectroscopy
High-resolution mapping of GABA in
the brain has long been desired by the neuroscience community. But it is still
challenging due to several long-standing technical obstacles including low SNR,
long scan time, and spectral overlapping. This work proposes an MRSI method
integrating multi-slab EPSI acquisition, MEGA spectral editing, and subspace
modeling to overcome these difficulties, successfully achieving 3D GABA and
metabolite mapping (at 3.0×3.0×4.0 mm
3 nominal resolution) in a
12-minute scan time.
Introduction
As the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA plays a
crucial role in regulating brain function. Mapping of GABA distribution in the
brain has long been of strong interest by the neuroscience and neuropsychiatric
communities.1-3 However, the most commonly used MEGA-PRESS sequence
for GABA detection only provides measurements for single voxel,4 and
the recently developed MRSI methods are largely limited to low resolution and
long scan time.5,6 These techniques can not fulfill the ever-increasing
practical needs.
3D mapping of GABA in high-resolution is very
challenging mainly due to (a) large number of encodings needed, (b) spectral
overlapping with other metabolites, and (c) significantly limited SNR. In this work, we
propose a new MRSI method to overcome these challenges. The proposed method
uses multi-slab EPSI acquisition for high acquisition efficiency, uses
J-editing to resolve spectral overlapping of GABA, and uses subspace modeling
and learning to overcome the SNR limitation. The preliminary results showed
that GABA and metabolite maps at 3.0×3.0×4.0 mm3 nominal resolution
were successfully obtained in a 12-minute scan using the proposed method. Methods
Acquisition sequence:
Figure 1 shows the pulse diagram of the proposed
acquisition sequence, that features: (a) multi-slab excitation, (b) MEGA-based
spectral editing, and (c) fast EPSI-based trajectories. Multi-slab acquisition
is used to optimize between the encoding efficiency and SNR efficiency for the
spin-echo based sequence. In current implementation, 6 slabs were acquired in
an interleaved fashion to reduce the inter-slab interference (Figure 1(b)), and
the TR (1600 ms) was selected for a good SNR efficiency for GABA signals
(Figure 1(c)). The frequency-selective MEGA pulses were centered at 1.9 ppm and
7.5 ppm in EDIT-ON and EDIT-OFF modes, respectively. The EPSI trajectories provided
80 encodings in one readout, leading to an echo-spacing of 1.4 ms. The other
sequence parameters were: FOV = 240×240×72 mm3, Matrix = 80×80×18
(corresponding to 3.0×3.0×4.0 mm3 nominal resolution), TE/TR = 68
ms/1600 ms, WET for water suppression, total scan time = 12.5 minutes. All the
experiments were carried out on a 3T system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
Subspace modeling and learning:
Based on the partial separability,7 the J-edited MRSI spatiotemporal signals can be represented using a
low-rank subspace model, thus reducing the number of degrees-of-freedom:
$$\rho(\textbf{x},t,m)=\sum_{l=1}^{L}c_l(\textbf{x})φ_l(t,m)$$
where $$${φ_l(t,m)},{c_l(x)},L,m$$$ denote the basis functions, spatial coefficients, model order, and editing mode (EDIT-ON or OFF), respectively.
It should be noted that the basis functions {$$$φ_l(t,m)$$$} can be formed separately for different editing
modes or jointly into one basis set. In the proposed method, this basis
function set was constructed jointly for better utilization of the correlation
between two editing modes.
A subspace learning
strategy was used to pre-determine the basis functions from training data.8-10
More specifically, the spectroscopic signals can be modeled as:
$$s(t)=\sum_n^Nb_nv_n(t)e^{-t/T_{2,n}+i2{\pi}f_nt}$$
where $$$v_n(t),T_{2,n},f_n$$$ represent the resonance structure, T2
relaxation time, and frequency shift of nth molecule, respectively.
With $$$v_n(t)$$$ generated by quantum mechanics simulations,
the distributions of spectral parameters $$$T_{2,n}$$$ and
$$$f_n$$$ were
estimated from training data by fitting to this spectral model. With the
distributions, a collection of spectral signals were synthesized, from which the
basis functions can be genrated. In this work, the basis functions were
learned from a set of phantom data acquired using the proposed sequence for
phantom scans, and they were learned from the open Big-GABA dataset for in
vivo scans.11
With the basis functions pre-determined, the reconstruction
was performed by solving:
$$\hat{C}=\arg\min_C{\parallel}d-F(CΦ){\parallel}_2^2+λ{\parallel}WC{\parallel}_2^2$$
where $$$d$$$ is
the vector form of (k, t)-space data, $$$F$$$ the
Fourier transform, $$$W$$$ the
edge-weighted total variation operator, and $$$C,Φ$$$ the matrix forms of {$$$c_l(x)$$$} and {$$$φ_l(t,m)$$$}, respectively.
The final reconstruction can be created as $$$\hat{\rho}=\hat{C}Φ$$$.Results
Figure 2(a) shows a water image acquired using the
proposed sequence on a phantom. From the slice profile, we can see there is
minimal discontinuity between slabs. Figure 2(b) shows a set of raw spectra
acquired using the proposed sequence with the same TR and total time but
different number of slabs. These spectra had similar levels of SNR, which
indicates that the multi-slab acquisition has similar SNR efficiency as typical
3D (single slab) acquisition, but much higher encoding efficiency.
The MRSI results from a spectroscopy phantom are
displayed in Figure 3, including NAA and GABA maps generated by (a) k-space
windowing, (b) reconstruction using separate subspaces and (c) reconstruction
using joint subspace. The last method provided the best results. The localized
EDIT-ON and EDIT-OFF spectra showed good SNR and the GABA peaks at 3.0 ppm were
clear in the difference spectrum.
Figure 4 shows the representative maps of GABA, Glx,
NAA, Cr, and Cho from a healthy volunteer using the proposed method. The GABA
signals (including co-edited macromolecule signals) were noticeable in the
representative difference spectrum given the data quality. Preliminary
test-retest scans were also performed by acquiring two sequential scans on a
volunteer (Figure 5). As we can see, the reproducibility of GABA mapping is
reasonable (γ = 0.636). Conclusion
By integrating multi-slab EPSI acquisition, MEGA
spectral editing, and subspace modeling, the proposed method can provide 3D
high-resolution GABA and metabolite mapping (3.0×3.0×4.0 mm3 nominal
resolution) in a 12-minute scan. With further development, it may provide a
powerful GABA mapping tool for many applications. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Schür RR, Draisma LWR, Wijnen JP, et al. Brain GABA levels across psychiatric
disorders: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(9):3337-3352.
2.
Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Johansen-Berg H. The role of GABA in human motor
learning. Curr Biol. 2011;21(6):480-484.
3.
Duncan NW, Wiebking C, Northoff G. Associations of regional GABA and glutamate
with intrinsic and extrinsic neural activity in humans-A review of multimodal
imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;47:36-52.
4.
Mullins PG, McGonigle DJ, O'Gorman RL, et al. Current practice in the use of
MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA. Neuroimage. 2014;86:43-52.
5.
Zhu H, Edden RAE, Ouwerkerk R, Barker PB. High resolution spectroscopic imaging
of GABA at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(3):603-609.
6.
Moser P, Hingerl L, Strasser B, et al. Whole-slice mapping of GABA and GABA+ at
7 T via adiabatic MEGA-editing, real-time instability correction, and
concentric circle readout. Neuroimage. 2019;184:475-489.
7. Liang ZP. Spatiotemporal imaging with partially
separable functions. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2007:988–991.
8. Li Y, Lam F, Cliiford B, et al. A subspace approach
to spectral quantification for MR spectroscopic imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.
2017;64(10):2486-2489.
9. Lam
F, Liang ZP. A subspace approach to high‐resolution spectroscopic imaging. Magn
Reson Med. 2014;71(4):1349-1357.
10. Lam
F, Li Y, Guo R, et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using
SPICE with learned subspaces. Magn Reson Med. 2020;83(2):377-390.
11. Mikkelsen M, Barker PB, Bhattacharyya PK, et al.
Big GABA: Edited MR spectroscopy at 24 research sites. Neuroimage.
2017;159:32-45.