Keywords: fMRI, White Matter
In this study, by integrating 7T high-resolution imaging and massive data averaging, we show that white matter fMRI activations can be detected at a single-voxel level. Hemodynamic changes evoked by the flickering checkerboard stimuli were not homogenous within the optic radiation, and the averaged pattern exhibited a delayed time to peak longer than V1, consistent with previous literature. The current datasets also revealed stimulus-locked changes in certain white-matter tracts beyond the visual pathway.[1] Gawryluk, J.R., Mazerolle, E.L. and D'Arcy, R.C., 2014. Does functional MRI detect activation in white matter? A review of emerging evidence, issues, and future directions. Frontiers in neuroscience, 8, p.239.
[2] Gore, J.C., Li, M., Gao, Y., Wu, T.L., Schilling, K.G., Huang, Y., Mishra, A., Newton, A.T., Rogers, B.P., Chen, L.M. and Anderson, A.W., 2019. Functional MRI and resting state connectivity in white matter-a mini-review. Magnetic resonance imaging, 63, pp.1-11.
[3] Li, M., Newton, A.T., Anderson, A.W., Ding, Z. and Gore, J.C., 2019. Characterization of the hemodynamic response function in white matter tracts for event-related fMRI. Nature communications, 10(1), pp.1-11.
[4] Marussich, L., Lu, K.H., Wen, H. and Liu, Z., 2017. Mapping white-matter functional organization at rest and during naturalistic visual perception. Neuroimage, 146, pp.1128-1141.
[5] Ding, Z., Huang, Y., Bailey, S.K., Gao, Y., Cutting, L.E., Rogers, B.P., Newton, A.T. and Gore, J.C., 2018. Detection of synchronous brain activity in white matter tracts at rest and under functional loading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(3), pp.595-600.
[6] Schilling, K.G., Li, M., Rheault, F., Ding, Z., Anderson, A.W., Kang, H., Landman, B.A. and Gore, J.C., 2022. Anomalous and heterogeneous characteristics of the BOLD hemodynamic response function in white matter. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 3(3), p.tgac035.
[7] Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Saad, Z.S., Handwerker, D.A., Inati, S.J., Brenowitz, N. and Bandettini, P.A., 2012. Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(14), pp.5487-5492.
[8] Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Hoy, C.W., Handwerker, D.A., Roopchansingh, V., Inati, S.J., Saad, Z.S., Cox, R.W. and Bandettini, P.A., 2015. Task dependence, tissue specificity, and spatial distribution of widespread activations in large single-subject functional MRI datasets at 7T. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), pp.4667-4677.
[9] Setsompop, K., Gagoski, B.A., Polimeni, J.R., Witzel, T., Wedeen, V.J. and Wald, L.L., 2012. Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 67(5), pp.1210-1224.
[10] Warrington, S., Bryant, K.L., Khrapitchev, A.A., Sallet, J., Charquero-Ballester, M., Douaud, G., Jbabdi, S., Mars, R.B. and Sotiropoulos, S.N., 2020. XTRACT-Standardised protocols for automated tractography in the human and macaque brain. Neuroimage, 217, p.116923.
[11] De Groot, M., Vernooij, M.W., Klein, S., Ikram, M.A., Vos, F.M., Smith, S.M., Niessen, W.J. and Andersson, J.L., 2013. Improving alignment in tract-based spatial statistics: evaluation and optimization of image registration. Neuroimage, 76, pp.400-411.
[12] Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E.M., Laumann, T.O., Zuo, X.N., Holmes, A.J., Eickhoff, S.B. and Yeo, B.T., 2018. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cerebral cortex, 28(9), pp.3095-3114.
Figure 1 SHRs in the cerebral cortex (Dataset I). (A) Cortical parcellations were generated using a 7-network 100-parcel functional atlas [12]. Each panel shows the response of one cortical parcel. Mean and standard errors across all blocks and sessions are shown. (B) Task activations derived from a general linear model analysis, using the canonical hemodynamic response function. These results reproduce findings from previous studies [7,8].
Figure 2 SHRs of V1 and optic radiation (Dataset I and Dataset II, unsmoothed data). While the shapes of the SHRs in the white matter are not clearly recognizable, they are consistent across trials, as evidenced in the low trial-to-trial variability represented in the error bars, and similar in magnitude to responses seen in gray matter outside the visual network (as shown in Figure 1). For Dataset II “hFOV Only”, only the contralateral optic radiation was included for analyses.
Figure 3 Illustration of spatially varying SHRs within the optic radiation (Dataset I and Dataset II). Responses with different spatial smoothing kernels are shown.
Figure 4 Spatial scores and time courses of the principal components within the optic radiation (Dataset I and Dataset II, unsmoothed data). The map of the scores demonstrates that white-matter locations exhibiting the positive monophasic response can be adjacent to locations exhibiting the more negative (or delayed) multiphasic response.
Figure 5. SHRs of exemplar white-matter tracts outside the optic radiation (Dataset I, unsmoothed data, mean and standard errors across all trials are shown). The spatial mask of each tract is displayed on the left of the SHR.