Alix Plumley1, Mara Cercignani1, Álvaro Planchuelo-Gómez1,2, James Gholam1, and Derek K Jones1
1Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Synopsis
Keywords: Software Tools, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Low-field
A super-resolution approach was used to create 2mm isotropic
diffusion tensor images (DTI) from diffusion-weighted imaging data acquired on
a low field, portable system. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy and principal
eigenvector orientation maps are shown. This work extends the very recently
implemented capability of performing DTI on a 64mT system, and shows substantial
improvement due to the increased through-plane resolution achieved with
super-resolution.
Introduction
Low-cost, low-field MRI systems can increase accessibility
to MRI in locations where higher-field systems are unavailable. Functionality
of a 64 mT, portable MR system (Swoop, Hyperfine Inc., Guilford, CT) was
recently extended to perform diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)1 and diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI)2, both of which can provide valuable, non-invasive
insight into clinically- and developmentally-relevant metrics (e.g., refs 3-5).
Nevertheless, the low signal-to-noise ratio available at 64 mT means that image
resolution in the slice direction is generally poor (~6mm in ref. 2). Here,
we employ a super-resolution approach based on ref [6] to reconstruct 2mm isotropic
DTIs from DWIs acquired at 64 mT.Methods
Data was acquired on a Hyperfine Swoop (hardware version
1.7, software version 8.5). A six-direction optimised icosahedral scheme7 was
used to acquire DWIs at b=600 s/mm2, along with a b=0 s/mm2
image. Two averages were acquired for each direction using a 3D turbo spin echo
sequence with navigator echo, hysteresis correction and eddy current
pre-compensation as described in1. The six DWI (and b=0 s/mm2)
scans were repeated for three orthogonal acquisitions (a total of 18 DWI
volumes), varying the low-resolution through-plane direction, which was inferior-superior,
anterior-posterior, and left-right for axial, coronal and sagittal
acquisitions, respectively (figure 1). TE and TR were 86ms and 1s, respectively. Total scan time was
approximately 90 minutes.
Data were de-noised using block-matching and 4-D filtering8
and brain extraction was performed using FSL’s bet9. The axial, coronal and
sagittal b=0 s/mm2 images were combined to form one 2mm isotropic image
using ANTs’ antsMultivariateTemplateConstruction2 tool10. The affine and warp
transformations applied to each b=0s/mm2 image were saved. Next, the
following steps were applied independently to the axially-, coronally- and
sagittally-acquired DWI data:
1)
The diffusion tensor was fit with least squares
estimation using FSL’s dtifit, and the six unique tensor elements were
extracted.
2)
The corresponding previously-saved transformations
were applied to each tensor element using antsApplyTransforms.
3)
The effect of the transformations on the diffusion
tensor was corrected using ANTs ReorientTensorImage.
Finally, the three DTIs were averaged using ANTs
AverageTensorImage, yielding a 2mm isotropic DTI. Mean diffusivity, fractional
anisotropy and RGB (principal eigenvector) maps were generated using ANTs
ImageMath functions.Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows mean diffusivity (MD) values. White matter,
grey matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed good contrast, and were in line with known MD values
(e.g., ~.0022 mm2/s in CSF11). Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps
are shown in figure 3. The super-resolved volume clearly delineates the major
white matter tracts in all three viewing planes.
Red-green-blue (RGB) fibre orientation maps are shown in figure 4. Although
the major tracts were clearly visible in all three viewing planes, the
principal eigenvector revealed a bias in the anterior-posterior direction (apparent
from the dominance of green colour in figure 4a). This was also apparent when looking
at the diffusion tensor elements, where the Dyy component was substantially stronger
than the other elements (data not shown). We therefore applied a correction by modifying the
b-value used in the initial tensor calculation. Specifically, MD was measured
in a water phantom using the same six-direction, three-plane scheme. The
overall average MD value was used to establish a relative scaling factor for
each gradient direction and each acquisition plane, which was subsequently
applied to the in-vivo data. The correction yielded a reduction in the Dyy
component (and an increase in the Dzz component), as anticipated (figure 5b).
Resultant modest but appreciable improvements to the principal
eigenvector were present (figure 4b), most clearly noticeable in the anterior
part of the brain (yellow circle), where the anterior-posterior components (green)
were somewhat reduced. The calibration (phantom) data used to calculate the correction factor contained only four
averages. We believe that further improvements could be made by increasing the
number of averages in this data.
The benefits of the increased through-plane resolution
offered by the super-resolution approach are clear – compared to ref 2, the
coronal and sagittal viewing planes offer rich and detailed structural
information; the coherence of which are otherwise compromised with large voxels in the through-plane dimension. Future directions
include incorporating machine learning approaches to reduce the acquisition time - the most restricting factor for clinical practice.Conclusion
Diffusion tensor MR-imaging was performed on data acquired
from a 64 mT portable system. A super-resolution technique was applied to combine
diffusion-weighted images acquired in three orthogonal imaging planes,
resulting in 2mm isotropic resolution. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy
and principal eigenvector maps show detailed white-matter structure for major
tracts as well as good grey-white matter contrast in the three viewing planes.Acknowledgements
This work was made possible by generous
support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through the award of the
UNITY project, and through the Wellcome LEAP 1kD programme. ÁP-G was supported
by the European Union (NextGenerationEU).References
[1] O’Halloran, R. et al. Proc.
ISMRM 2022, London: 0043.
[2] Plumley, A. et al., Proc. ISMRM
Diffusion Workshop 2022, Amsterdam: 90.
[3] Wedderburn, C. et al. SSRN
Preprint: doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3920258, 2021.
[4] Roos, A. et al. Drug
Alcohol Depend.: doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108826, 2021.
[5] Kar, P. et al. Human Brain
Mapping: doi: 10.1002/hbm.25944, 2022.
[6] Deoni, S. et al. Magn.
Reson. Med., 88(3): 1273-1281, 2022.
[7] Muthupallai, R. et al. Proc. ISMRM 1999,
Philadelphia: 1825.
[8] Maggioni, M. et al., IEEE
Trans. Image Process., 22(1): 119-133, 2013.
[9] Smith, S.M., Hum. Brain
Mapp., 17(3): 143-155, 2002.
[10] Avants, B. et al., Neuroimage,
54(3): 2033-2044, 2011.
[11] Santos, J.M.G. et al. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 26(1):
35-44.