Bing-Fong Lin1, Dao-Chen Lin2,3,4, and Chia-Feng Lu1
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Division of Endocrine and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 4School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Keywords: Radiomics, Quantitative Imaging, Pituitary adenoma
Pituitary
adenoma (PA) accounts for approximately 15% in intracranial neoplasms. The classification
of PA generally based on the hormone level of blood as the gold standard test, while
the analysis of hormone condition using neuroimaging biomarkers was less
explored. Accordingly, our study developed a model to automatically segment PA
and further used the quantitative and non-invasive MRI technique as image
biomarkers to classify the three types of hormone pattern, focusing on
corticortroph, gonadotroph, and plurihormonal type. We aimed to provide a
feasible classification model based MRI to benefit the clinical management of
patients with PA.
Background and Purpose
Pituitary adenoma
(PA) accounts for approximately 15% in
intracranial neoplasms [1]. PA may lead to secrete excess hormones (including
prolactin, growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and thyrotropin) or be nonsecreting
(most gonadotroph lineage) [2]. The classification of PA generally based on the
hormone level of blood as the gold standard test. Once the PA becomes lager and compresses the brain
tissue, such as optic nerves, or the hormone test is positive, surgery will be
needed. Previous studies reported that non-functioning PA may have early progression or recurrence after surgery, and MR radiomics can provide precise prediction [3]. However, the differentiation of hormone pattern
using neuroimaging biomarkers was less explored. Accordingly, our study
combined the deep learning–based segmentation and radiomics to fulfill the series of PA subtype classification.
For the first part of this study, we developed a model to automatically segment
PA. The second part was to perform the subtype classification of PA using the
MRI radiomics. We aimed to identify image biomarkers to classify the three
types of hormone pattern in PA, including corticortroph, gonadotroph, and
plurihormonal type.Materials and Methods
We
retrospectively concluded 147 patients with pituitary adenoma and hormone
pattern proved by immunohistology between 2010 and 2020 at Taipei Veterans
General Hospital. MRI data include contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1),
T2-weighted images (T2W), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
Several
postprocessing steps on the MRI were applied to reduce the discrepancy of
imaging parameters using our previously published MRI radiomics platform (MRP, http://www.ym.edu.tw/~cflu/MRP_MLinglioma.html) with a graphic user interface built on MATLAB
programming environment [4]. The adjustment of image resolution was first
performed to resample all voxel size to isotropic spatial resolution (1.00 x
1.00 x 1.00 mm3) for each MRI contrast according to Image biomarker
standardisation initiative (IBSI) [5]. The PA lesions were manually delineated and
used for training an automatic segmentation model followed by the extraction of
1178 radiomic features (including the gray-scale intensity patterns, lesion
shape/size geometry, and texture features).
A
two-pathway 3D U-Net architecture was proposed, and CET1 and T2W images were
used as multi-parametric input volumes. The deep-learning segmentation model was
built on MATLAB interface (with Deep Learning Toolbox and Computer Vision
Toolbox in R2022a version).
N-way
analysis of variance (N-way ANOVA) was performed to extract the significantly
different features (p <0.05) between three types of hormone pattern in PA. Random
forest (RF) classifier was utilized to extract the features and further build
the classification models of PA subtype based on radiomic predictors. The
dataset was randomly separated into training dataset and testing dataset with a
ratio of 8:2. To assess the reproducibility of this model, we tested modeling
performance with bootstrap of 100 times. Figure
1 shows the workflow of PA analysis.Results and Discussion
We used
100 patients’ MRI data to build up U-Net models for the automatic PA segmentation. We
further applied data augmentation by flipping image left and right and rotating
image with 10, 20, 30, and 40 degrees to increase sample size to 900 MRI
datasets. Among these data, 850 image sets were used to train the 3D U-Net and
50 image sets were used for model evaluation. Figure 2a shows the ground truth and the predicted segmentation of a demonstrative case. Results showed that the model could achieve a dice coefficient with a median of 0.680 (Figure 2b).
For the
second part of this study, 90 patients' MRI data were used to identify radiomic
features for classification. The predictors were extracted from CET1 (35.2%),
T2WI (57.4%), and ADC (7.4%). This finding was consisted with previous study
that T2WI could provide most of valuable information for subtype classification
of PA model [6]. Furthermore, CET1 could also improve the model
performance (Figure 3). We found most
of the selected radiomic features were texture features and small part of them
were histogram features, while no geometry feature was selected (Figure 3). Our PA data contained
microadenoma, macroadenoma, and aggressive adenoma among three subtypes.
Accordingly, we speculated that the conventional visual inspection without
quantitative analysis based on radiomics could not differentiate the PA
subtypes effectively.
By
analyzing our confusion matrix, the mistakes made by the classifier were one
case of corticortroph identified as gonadotroph type, and the other case of
plurihormonal identified as gonadotroph type. The overall accuracy of the RF
model in the test group was 88.9% (16/18) (Figure
4). After 100 times bootstrapping, our data showed a right skewness with an
accuracy of 0.89 (Figure 4).
Previous studies have only classified the PA into two subtypes, such as
functional vs. nonfunctional or soft vs. fibrous [3, 6]. In this study, we constructed a RF model
based on MRI radiomics to classify the PA into three subtype. We suggested that
multi-parametric MRI, including CET1, T2WI, and ADC, could provide sufficient image
features for PA classification. Acknowledgements
This work was
supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST
109-2314-B-010-022-MY3).References
1. Melmed, S., Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. New
England Journal of Medicine, 2020. 382(10):
p. 937-950.
2. Melmed, S., Pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Nature
Reviews Endocrinology, 2011. 7(5):
p. 257-266.
3. Zhang, Y., et al., Radiomics approach for prediction of
recurrence in non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas. Frontiers in
oncology, 2020. 10: p. 2913.
4. Lu, C.-F., et al., Machine Learning–Based Radiomics for
Molecular Subtyping of GliomasMachine Learning for Molecular Subtyping of
Gliomas. Clinical Cancer Research, 2018. 24(18): p. 4429-4436.
5. Zwanenburg, A., et
al., The image biomarker standardization
initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based
phenotyping. Radiology, 2020. 295(2):
p. 328-338.
6. Cuocolo, R., et al.,
Prediction of pituitary adenoma surgical
consistency: radiomic data mining and machine learning on T2-weighted MRI.
Neuroradiology, 2020. 62(12): p.
1649-1656.