Daehun Kang1, Koji Uchida2, Clifton Haider3, Erin Gray1, Myung-Ho In1, Joshua Trzasko1, Norbert Campeau1, Kirk Welker1, Jeffrey Gunter1, Yunhong Shu1, Matt A Bernstein1, Max Trenerry4, David III Holmes3, Michael Joyner2, Timothy Curry2, and John III Huston 1
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 4Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Brain Connectivity, fMRI, Hypoxia
Acute exposure to a severely low oxygen environment (<10%)
can cause temporary deterioration of cognitive performance. To better
understand the mechanism of the hypoxic-related temporary cognitive impairment
in the human brain, we examined functional connectivity changes in brain
networks during acute severe hypoxia while subjects performed a cognitive task.
The acute severe hypoxic environment temporarily increases functional
connectivity among salience (SN), default mode (DMN), executive central (ECN), sensorimotor,
and visuospatial networks. We observed that increased connectivity of SN to DMN
and to ECN during acute severe hypoxia is related with the behavioral cognitive
deterioration.
INTRODUCTION
Severe hypoxia,
accompanied by an immediate drop in the blood oxygenation of both arteries and
veins, is known to cause cognitive performance deterioration as well as extreme
physiological perturbations [1-7]. However, little
is known regarding how brain functional connectivity changes in response to acute
severe hypoxia [8,9]. We examined functional connectivity
in well-known human brain networks during acute severe hypoxia while subjects
performed a cognitive task.
To extract
neuroactivity-related spontaneous BOLD signal from the bulk BOLD signal drop caused
by reduced blood oxygenation with hypoxia stimulation, ANATICOR regression [10] derived
from a local white matter was used in the preprocessing pipeline. Timeframe-wise functional
connectivity with functional ROIs defined in the previous study [11] was examined to observe
brain network reorganization with the acute severe hypoxia.METHODS
Total of 11 young healthy
participants (6M/5F, 26.5 ± 4.4 years) were imaged using a high performance Compact
3T (C3T) MRI scanner [12], under an IRB-approved protocol with
written informed consent. Each subject participated in two sessions of
10-minute BOLD fMRI measurement while performing Go/No-go task (identical
session-to-session) [8]. One session
included the hypoxic stimulation with a normobaric hypoxic gas mixture
containing 7.7% O2 balanced with N2, approximating
atmospheric conditions at 8000 m elevation. The experiment protocols are summarized
in Figure 1.
For fMRI acquisition, GRE-EPI
imaging (TR 2 s, TE 30 ms, resolution 2.5 mm isotropic, 3 MB, 5/8 partial
Fourier) were acquired with a 32-channel head coil (Nova Medical, MA, USA) on the
C3T scanner [12,
13]. Also, a 3D
MPRAGE sequence was acquired for T1-weighted anatomical imaging.
fMRI datasets were
preprocessed including RETROICOR [14], spatial
normalization to MNI template, motion (rigid-body displacement and their first derivative), local-white-matter (ANATICOR [10]) and Legendre polynomial regressions to mitigate artifacts arising
from cardiac and respiratory fluctuations, motions and hypoxia/system-induced BOLD signal
drift, which were performed with AFNI software package [15] and FreeSurfer [16].
To examine functional
connectivity in the three phases as depicted in Figure 1(d), functional
connectivity of each phase was evaluated based on 14 brain networks consisting
of 90 functional regions of interest (ROI) [11]. The preprocessed
fMRI datasets (i.e., residual BOLD signal time course) were combined for each ROI
in each phase of a subject and then Pearson correlations with Fisher
z-transformation (i.e., Fisher(r)) among ROIs were calculated for each phase of
each subject. To examine hypoxia effect, Group differences of ‘Phase #2-#1’ and
‘Phase #3-#1’ in functional connectivity were assessed and compared with those
obtained in the control scan.RESULTS
Since the data from two
participants were rejected due to excessive motion during fMRI sessions, the data
from nine participants (eight right-handed/one left-handed) were used for
further analysis.
Figure 2 shows the functional
connectivity matrices and the difference between phases. Among 4005 connections
originated from 90 ROIs, 174 connections (approximately 4.3% among 4005
connections) were significantly changed by hypoxia stimulation in the
difference of ‘Phase #2-#1’, while at most 33 connections were varied in other
comparisons.
In Figure 3, the average
of the 174 functional connections of interest, selected at lower triangle of
the ‘Phase #2-#1’ matrix in Figure 2(b), was calculated. The functional connections
of interest in the ‘Phase #2-#1’ difference remarkably increased by 0.256
(±0.094) from 0.241 (±0.217) to 0.498 (±0.194) during hypoxia, while a smaller
change of -0.019 (±0.079) was observed in the control scan. In the ‘Phase
#3-#1’ difference, the functional connections of interest in Phase #3 slightly
increased compared to the Phase #1 for both scans.
In a view of brain-network
level connection in Figure 4(a), most of the more-connected connections by
hypoxia stimulation were placed on “inter-network” connection among salience,
default mode, and executive central, sensorimotor, and visuospatial networks
(namely, SN, DMN, ECN, SMN, and VSN, respectively). Figure 4(b) showed simplified
diagram for the numbers of the inter-network connections among the major five
networks. However, few intra-network connections were changed.
The
behavioral results in Figure 5 verified that the hypoxia stimulation used in
this study caused the temporary cognitive deterioration.DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION
We attempted to understand
the temporary cognitive deterioration resulting from an acute severe hypoxic
environment in terms of brain functional connectivity. Hypoxia-induced change
in functional connectivity was assessed with functional ROIs to compose
well-known brain networks. The hypoxic stimulation would temporarily cause
brain network reorganization accompanied by cognitive deterioration.
Interestingly, we observed functional connectivity increased by hypoxic
stimulation rather than decreased.
Our results showed that
SN connected more with both DMN and ECN by hypoxia stimulation. It has been reported
that SN connected more with both DMN and ECN and that functional connectivity
within DMN or ECN changed as a task load elevated with more difficult working
memory tasks [17]. Since the task load did not change
in our protocol, it is inferred that the increased connectivity with SN occurred
because of temporary reduction in available cognitive resource by hypoxia,
rather than increase in cognitive demands. Since intra-network connections in
DMN and ECN did not change with hypoxia, it was expected as there was no change
in task load as observed in the previous study [17]. Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research under Contract No. N00014-18-D-7001 and Grant No. N00014-16-1-3173. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research.References
1. Binks,
A.P., et al., Gray matter blood flow
change is unevenly distributed during moderate isocapnic hypoxia in humans.
J Appl Physiol (1985), 2008. 104(1):
p. 212-7.
2. Lawley,
J.S., et al., Unexpected reductions in
regional cerebral perfusion during prolonged hypoxia. J Physiol, 2017. 595(3): p. 935-947.
3. Harris,
A.D., et al., Cerebral blood flow
response to acute hypoxic hypoxia. NMR Biomed, 2013. 26(12): p. 1844-52.
4. Sicard,
K.M. and T.Q. Duong, Effects of hypoxia,
hyperoxia, and hypercapnia on baseline and stimulus-evoked BOLD, CBF, and CMRO2
in spontaneously breathing animals. Neuroimage, 2005. 25(3): p. 850-8.
5. Kang,
D., et al. The impact of acute and severe
hypoxia observed by pCASL MR brain imaging on Compact 3T MRI scanner. in Annual meeting of the Organization for Human
Brain Mapping. 2021.
6. Kang,
D., et al. Regional differences in
cerebral BOLD signal response induced by severe transient hypoxia. in Annual meeting of the Organization for Human
Brain Mapping. 2021.
7. Uchida,
K., et al., A Novel Method to Measure
Transient Impairments in Cognitive Function During Acute Bouts of Hypoxia.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform, 2020. 91(11):
p. 839-844.
8. Uchida,
K., et al., Relationship between
Decreased Oxygenation during Acute Hypoxia and Cognitive Deterioration in
Healthy Humans. Faseb Journal, 2020. 34.
9. Buchholtz,
Z.A., et al., Young Healthy Humans
Demonstrate Reduced Executive Function in Moderate Hypoxia. The FASEB
Journal, 2020. 34(S1): p. 1-1.
10. Jo,
H.J., et al., Mapping sources of
correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal.
Neuroimage, 2010. 52(2): p. 571-82.
11. Shirer,
W.R., et al., Decoding subject-driven
cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex,
2012. 22(1): p. 158-65.
12. Foo,
T.K.F., et al., Lightweight, compact, and
high-performance 3T MR system for imaging the brain and extremities. Magn
Reson Med, 2018. 80(5): p.
2232-2245.
13. Tan,
E.T., et al., High slew-rate head-only
gradient for improving distortion in echo planar imaging: Preliminary
experience. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016. 44(3): p. 653-64.
14. Glover,
G.H., T.Q. Li, and D. Ress, Image-based
method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI:
RETROICOR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2000. 44(1): p. 162-167.
15. Cox,
R.W., AFNI: software for analysis and
visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed
Res, 1996. 29(3): p. 162-73.
16. Reuter,
M., et al., Within-subject template
estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage, 2012. 61(4): p. 1402-18.
17. Liang, X., et al., Topologically Reorganized Connectivity
Architecture of Default-Mode, Executive-Control, and Salience Networks across
Working Memory Task Loads. Cereb Cortex, 2016. 26(4): p. 1501-1511.