Shengyong Li1, Xiaonan Wang2,3, Yida Wang1, Yang Song4, and Guang Yang1
1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Beijing, China, 3Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, 4MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease, Arterial spin labelling
To
investigate the added value of T1-mapping to arterial spin labeling (ASL) for
computer-aided early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A total of 97 (45
AD/24 mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/38 normal control (NC)) people were
enrolled retrospectively. We extracted features from 24 automatically segmented
brain regions based on T1-mapping and ASL MR images and constructed three radiomics
models to differentiate AD-NC/MIC-NC/AD-MCI,
for which the radiomics models achieved a favorable prediction performance with
the AUCs of 0.921/0.764/0.727, respectively.
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease
(AD) is the most common cause of dementia with the rising incidences, putting a
huge burden on the global public health care system1. The accuracy
of the its diagnosis in the early stages, such as mild cognitive impairment
(MCI), still needs to be improved. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a new
technique of MRI that can quantitatively measure cerebral blood flow (CBF)
in different brain regions using magnetically labeled water protons in arterial
blood to replace injected exogenous contrast agent2,3. The diagnostic accuracy of ASL alone,
especially in the early stage of the disease, needs to be further improved. Different
biological tissues have distinctive T1 values due to differences in their
cellular and interstitial components. With the magnetization-prepared two rapid
acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE), T1-mapping can now be generated at high
resolution within a clinically acceptable scan time. Radiomics has been widely
used to establish diagnosis and prediction models for tumor grading and
staging, treatment outcome evaluation, and prognosis prediction. Recently, T1WI
texture analysis has also been used to produce imaging biomarkers for AD4.
Therefore, we hypothesized that combining ASL and T1-mapping might yield better
results. In this study, a radiomics model using ASL and T1-mapping features was
built to diagnose AD and MCI.Methods
We enrolled 45 AD patients, 24 MCI patients,
and 38 normal control (NC) subjects from Beijing Hospital between September
2020 to December 2021. All MR examinations were performed on a 3T
MR system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a
64-channel head coil. ASL was performed using a prototype 3D gradient and
spin-echo (GRASE) sequence. Regional CBF maps were automatically generated
inline after data acquisition. T1
mapping was obtained using MP2RAGE
sequence.
The workflow was shown
in Figure 1.
A brain morphometry analysis integrated with the prototype MP2RAGE sequence in
the system, provided tissue classification and morphometric segmentation
results6. MP2RAGE-UNI image was
used to segment the brain into 48 areas, among them, 24 brain regions were used
for analysis in this study. ASL images were co-registered to the corresponding MP2RAGE-UNI
images.
We constructed a radiomics model to distinguish AD from
NC firstly. Then, the features selected by AD-NC model were used to classify
MCI-NC and AD-MCI. Mann-Whitney U-test
was performed to compare the distribution of each feature in positive and negative samples, and features whose
p-value < 0.017 (Bonferroni corrected5) were selected for further
model building. All features
were normalized to the range of [0,1]. For each pair of features, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated
and if the PCC>0.99, one random feature in the pair was deleted to reduce
feature redundancy. To get the best model, we tried different combinations of
two feature selectors (Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and Relief) and two classifiers (SVM and LR)
with good interpretability. To determine the optimal
number of features to retain in the model, we used a leave-one-out
cross-validation (CV) and the change of average CV AUC was plotted against
number of features retained, and the model with the highest average CV AUC was
selected. Finally, features
in the radiomics model were combined with age to build radiomic-clinical model.
All
the model building was implemented with an open-source software, FeAtureExplorer7
(ver. 0.5.2), which uses scikit-learn (ver. 0.23.2) for machine learning.Results
The result was listed in Table 1. For the AD-NC/MCI-NC/AD-MCI classification, the radiomics models using four
features extracted from T1-mapping and ASL MR images achieved optimal
performance with the AUC of 0.921 (95% CI:
0.858-0.984)/0.764(95% CI: 0.633-0.896)/0.727(95% CI: 0.586-0.868) (Figure 2), which is higher
than the model using ASL features. Figure 3 listed the selected features and
the coefficients of features in the T1+ASL model. DCA plots for each model are
shown in Figure 4. When the
threshold probability is between 0.55 and 0.60, the net benefit is the highest
of all models.Discussion
This study automatically extracts features from brain region masks automatically
generated by the prototype MP2RAGE protocol, without the labor required for manual
outline. ASL+T1 signature showed diagnostic performance better
than those of ASL or T1 model. Compared with a previous work8 that
discriminated stable cognitive function (sCON) and MCI based on ASL images, and
our study not only had a higher AUC (0.764 vs. 0.710) in MCI-NC classification, but also covered AD-MCI and
AD-NC classification. In addition, our results were better than Feng Feng’s
work4 which used only T1WI images (AUC: 0.764 vs. 0.690). It was demonstrated that combining
T1-mapping and ASL can help improve AD related diagnosis. The proposed model
used the T1-mapping values in insular and left hippocampus, the CBF value in
left hippocampus. These brain regions are related to cognitive function, which
may help us understand the mechanisms of AD.
The major limitation of this study comes
from its retrospective nature and its small number of patients enrolled.Conclusion
Combining
features from T1-mapping
and ASL images can achieve good diagnostic performance in the differentiation
of AD, MCI and, NC. T1 value of insular and hippocampus and CBF value of hippocampus were retained in the model,
consistent with the knowledge of the functions of involved brain regions.Acknowledgements
This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61731009, 81771816) and the Open Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance.References
1. World
Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey through the diagnosis of dementia.
2. Verfaillie
SC, Adriaanse SM, Binnewijzend MA, et al. Cerebral perfusion and glucose
metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: two sides of the
same coin? Eur Radiol 2015.
3.
Chen, Y., Wolk, D.A., Reddin, J.S.,
Korczykowski, M., Martinez, P.M., Musiek, E.S.,Newberg, A.B., Julin, P. Arnold,
S.E., Greenberg, J.H., Detre, J.A.. 2011. Voxel-level comparison of arterial
spin-labeled perfusion MRI and FDG-PET in Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 77,
1977–1985.
4. Feng F, Wang
P, Zhao K, et al. Radiomic features of hippocampal subregions in Alzheimer’s
disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment[J]. Frontiers in aging
neuroscience, 2018, 10: 290.
5. Bland J M,
Altman D G. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method[J]. Bmj, 1995,
310(6973): 170.
6. Schmitter,
D., Roche, A., Maréchal, B., et al. (2014). An evaluation of volume-based
morphometry for prediction of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's
disease. Neuroimage Clin. 7:7-17. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.001
7. Song, Y. et al.
FeAture Explorer (FAE): A tool for developing and comparing radiomics models.
Plos One. 2020;15(8).
8. Xekardaki A,
Rodriguez C, Montandon M L, et al. Arterial spin labeling may contribute to the
prediction of cognitive deterioration in healthy elderly individuals[J].
Radiology, 2015, 274(2): 490-499.