Megha Goel1, Preetham Shankpal1, Suresh Emmanuel Joel1, Rajagopalan Sundareshan1, and Harsh Agarwal1
1GE Healthcare, Bengaluru, India
Synopsis
Keywords: Artifacts, Image Reconstruction, Zipper-removal
Zipper artifacts are commonly seen in MR images due to spurious radio-frequency signals or improper RF-shielding. Zipper-riddled images lose diagnostic value and are usually sent for rescan. Here, we attempt to mitigate zipper artifacts in the post-processing pipeline after scan has been acquired. We do this after channel combination technique has limited zipper appearance to 1-2 pseudo-channels, which we detect and remove from channel-combination process. We evaluated this on various brain contrasts and confirm reduction of zipper presence visually in the images. Given that zippers manifest as bright/dark discontinuous lines irrespective of the anatomy/contrast, the method should be generalizable.
INTRODUCTION
Zipper artifacts1,2 arise due to narrow
band unwarranted RF received by the receiver coil/s. The common sources of
these narrow band RF include improper closure of RF shield door, untested power
supply of the device kept in the shield room and improper routing of cable
inside the shield room. Zipper riddled images lose diagnostic value and
significant amount of time is spent by the MR technologist to detect and remove
the source of RF interference. If the source of RF interference is not
detected, then scanning session is suspended awaiting vendor support. In this
abstract, we have proposed method to mitigate zipper artifacts during MR image
reconstruction after the scan has been acquired. The proposed method can be
potentially used in shield-less MR and high RF interference environments.METHODS
Diagnostic MR images are
typically acquired with multi-channel receive coils. In order to minimize the
computational need of MR image reconstruction, channel compression3
is done wherein information from different channels is re-distributed using
singular-value-decomposition to generate virtual channel. Selected few
virtual-channels were used in MR image reconstruction resulting in channel
compression or reduction. We have observed that the zipper artifacts which were
present in each of the native receive coil image was present in only one or two
of the virtual channels which could be due to the fact that the RF interference
received by multi-channel receive coil is highly correlated. Here we propose a
two-step method,
Zipper manifested virtual channel
detection: Zipper dominated virtual channels were
detected in this step. As shown in Figure 1, a custom zipper amplitude detection algorithm has been implemented, which analyzes the mean intensity profiles of each virtual-channel image. The mean intensity has been taken along the phase-encode
direction, since zippers will manifest as sharp discontinuities here.
Zipper manifested virtual-channel removal: Zipper corrupted virtual-channels were dropped during channel compression step of MR image
reconstructionRESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Institution’s IRB board
approved study was conducted on a volunteer being scanned at the research 0.5T MRI scanner. The RF interference was injected into the system through a
metallic pipe which is routed in the MR shield room without the waveguide.
Common brain MR contrasts (T2w, T2-FLAIR, BRAVO) were acquired using 6 channels
of the 14-channel research HNU coil surrounding brain anatomy.
Figure 2 shows the
virtual-coil channel images of one slice and highlight two of those virtual channels, in one of which zippers are
present. The projection image collapsed along the readout direction shows spike
in underlying anatomy depicting the pixel/frequency of the RF interference
which is causing zipper artifact.
Zipper artifact removal
is demonstrated in the T2 FLAIR MRI in Figure 3. This method should work well
for any anatomy in general, given that zippers manifest as bright or dark
discontinuous lines in any MR image, irrespective of the anatomy or contrast.
A point worth mentioning here would be that this
method promises to be most impactful in acquisitions where there are fewer
coils/channels (2-8) left after channel compression, since with fewer channels
to derive information from, zipper effects are more distinguishably noticed.
RF interference is
typically mitigated by better RF shielding1,2, using hardware
methods which are restrictive and expensive. This method uses legacy recon
methods to condense zipper artefacts to 1 or 2 pseudo-channels of the
acquisition, and by removing these corrupted pseudo-channels, reduces zipper
artefacts with minimal loss in signal.
The proposed method can lead to potential loss of
anatomy if significant imaging signal is present in the zipper riddled virtual
channel. Also the proposed method can be employed only with multi-channel receive
system.CONCLUSION
The proposed strategy for
zipper detection and removal proves to be a viable solution for post MR
acquisition image quality enhancement. It can help with patient recall/rescan,
since zipper affected scans are usually outright rejected by radiologists.
Usually zipper
removal is done through hardware modifications, checks for spurious data1,2,
etc. Using channel compression in combination with line detection for zipper
removal has not been attempted before as per our knowledge.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Stadler, Alfred, et al. "Artifacts
in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them." European
radiology 17.5 (2007): 1242-1255.
[2] Yanasak,
Nathan E., and Michael J. Kelly. "MR imaging artifacts and parallel
imaging techniques with calibration scanning: a new twist on old
problems." Radiographics 34.2 (2014): 532-548.
[3] Huang, Feng, Sathya
Vijayakumar, and James Akao. "Software compression for partially parallel
imaging with multi-channels." 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine
and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 2006.
[4] Oliphant, Travis E. "Python for scientific
computing." Computing in science & engineering 9.3
(2007): 10-20.