Samantha By1, Jean-Christophe Houde2, Chahin Pachai1, Loika Maltais2, Jorge A. Torres3, Gabrielle Grenier2, Sujuan Huang4, and Daniel P. Bradley3
1Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, United States, 2Imeka Solutions, Inc., Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 3Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States, 4Cytel, Waltham, MA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Free water (FW)-corrected metrics in diffusion MRI have shown
promise in elucidating confounding pathological processes in multiple sclerosis
(MS). Here, we present a retrospective
analysis of FW-corrected diffusion in a cohort of 287 MS participants from a
multi-center clinical trial. Our preliminary results indicate the method’s
ability to distinguish different lesion types and MS subtypes.
Introduction
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a mainstay in many neurological clinical
assessments and clinical trials. Free water (FW) in dMRI can be measured when
the conventional diffusion tensor model is expanded to include an isotropic component
to fit the unconstrained water signal within a voxel1. In studies of
multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, elevated FW content has been associated with
neuroinflammation2,3, while elevated radial diffusivity (RD) has
been demonstrated to be a strong predictor of demyelination and axonal loss4.
Here, we present a retrospective analysis of FW-corrected dMRI, pooling data
from a large phase 2 clinical trial.Methods
Baseline data was pooled from the SYNERGY clinical trial
(NCT01864148): 287 multiple sclerosis participants (RRMS n=232, SPMS n=55) and 49
healthy volunteers from 70 different sites. The imaging protocol consisted of high
resolution T1-W (1.2 mm isotropic or 1.2 x 0.9 x 0.9 mm3), pre- and
post- contrast-enhanced T1-W (0.97 x 0.97 x 3 mm3), T2-W and
diffusion (in-plane resolution=1.25x1.25 mm2 or 2.5x2.5 mm2,
slice thickness=2.5-3 mm, number of unique directions= 13-31, b-value=1000 s/mm2,
averages=1-2) imaging. Imaging was performed on both 1.5T and 3T systems.
All diffusion datasets were pre-processed for artifact
removal (denoising, motion correction, and eddy current correction)5.
Diffusion maps were generated based on 1) the conventional diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI) model and 2) a bi-tensor model incorporating free water content
estimation.
Thirty-three bundles were extracted and analyzed. Regions of
interests along specific bundles were delineated on the T2-W and pre- and post-contrast
T1-W images, with the following MS lesion categories: acute (identified
as gadolinium-enhancing from the post-contrast T1-W images), chronic black
hole CBH (identified as hypointense from
the pre-contrast T1-W images), pre-existing T2 (identified as
hyperintense from the T2-W images), and normal appearing white matter NAWM (identified
by removing all lesions from the whole tract). For healthy volunteer comparisons, the whole
tract was assessed. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to
determine whether statistical differences between field strengths, lesion types
and MS subtypes were observed for the derived metrics. Results
For brevity, only FW and RD metrics in the corticospinal
tract (CST) are presented. FW-corrected DTI was successfully implemented in
this multi-center context. Notably, in healthy controls across sites, DTI-derived
and FW-corrected diffusion metrics were consistent across field strengths (RD: p=0.13,
FW: p=0.06, FW-corrected RDc: p=0.27). Figure 1 shows a
representative MS participant with conventional imaging (Fig. 1a, 1b, 1c),
along with the FW map (Fig. 1d) and FW-corrected RDc map (Fig.
1e). As shown in Figure 2, when FW correction was applied, the DTI-derived metric
RDc yielded lower values and resulted in lower variability in the
whole tract of healthy subjects (RD: 0.52±0.03, RDc: 0.50±0.02
µm2/ms), the NAWM of RRMS participants (RD: 0.55±0.03, RDc:
0.51±0.02 µm2/ms) and the NAWM of SPMS participants (RD: 0.56±0.04, RDc:
0.51±0.02 µm2/ms), though the contribution of FW content in healthy
controls was smaller than in the NAWM of MS participants, as expected (healthy:
3.1±1.4%, RRMS: 4.1±1.6%, SPMS: 4.4±1.7%). Lastly, Figure 3 demonstrates the potential of
FW-corrected diffusion for further distinguishing lesion types as well as MS
subtypes. In RRMS participants, FW-corrected RDc can differentiate NAWM
from acute, CBH and pre-existing T2 lesions (p<0.0001) and CBH lesions from
pre-existing T2 lesions (p<0.0001). FW-corrected RDc may also
highlight differences in CBH lesions (p<0.01) and pre-existing T2 lesions
(p<0.0001) between RRMS and SPMS participants.Discussion
The results herein are focused based on the interest of
biomarkers sensitive for neuroprotective therapies (RD) and edema (FW content);
the results within CST are presented due to its clinical impact on motor
function. To our knowledge, we present the implementation of dMRI with FW correction
in the largest multi-site, multi-field, and multi-vendor cohort of MS patients
to date. Our data suggests the potential of FW-corrected RDc in
distinguishing lesion types, potentially between MS subtypes, which may aid in characterizing
the response of lesions in MS clinical trials. The current data was limited due
to the varying diffusion sequence across sites and incorporation of only one
b-value shell. Additionally, healthy controls were not age or sex matched. Future
work will include longitudinal assessment of the derived metrics to determine the
method’s ability in elucidating lesion evolution. Furthermore, correlation of
metrics to clinical outcomes will be studied to help confirm the clinical
utility of the findings.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Pasternak O, Sochen N, Gur Y, et al. Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009: 62(3): 717-30.
2. Kim M, Choi KS, Hyun RC, et al. Free-water
diffusion tensor imaging detects occult periependymal abnormality in the
AQP4-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Sci Rep.
2022:12(512).
3. Beaudoin A, Rheault F, Theaud G, et al. Modern Technology in Multi-Shell Diffusion MRI Reveals
Diffuse White Matter Changes in Young Adults With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple
Sclerosis. Front Neurosci. 2021:15.
4. Schmierer K, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Tozer DJ, et
al. Quantitative magnetic resonance of post-mortem multiple sclerosis brain
before and after fixation. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(2):268–277.
5. Theaud G, Houde JC,
Boré A, et al. TractoFlow: A robust, efficient, and
reproducible diffusion MRI pipeline leveraging Nextflow & Singularity. NeuroImage.
2020;218.